Paraguay Returns to Jerusalem Via Commercial Bureau

President of Paraguay Mario Abdo Benitez gestures as he meets supporters in Asuncion, Paraguay, August 13, 2019. REUTERS/Jorge Adorno
President of Paraguay Mario Abdo Benitez gestures as he meets supporters in Asuncion, Paraguay, August 13, 2019. REUTERS/Jorge Adorno
TT

Paraguay Returns to Jerusalem Via Commercial Bureau

President of Paraguay Mario Abdo Benitez gestures as he meets supporters in Asuncion, Paraguay, August 13, 2019. REUTERS/Jorge Adorno
President of Paraguay Mario Abdo Benitez gestures as he meets supporters in Asuncion, Paraguay, August 13, 2019. REUTERS/Jorge Adorno

President of Paraguay Mario Abdo Benitez has agreed to open a “diplomatic commercial bureau” in West Jerusalem after coming under Israeli and US pressure.

Benitez’ decision came a year after deciding to shut down Paraguay’s embassy in Jerusalem and relocate it to Tel Aviv.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz welcomed his latest decision, saying that consolidating the position of Jerusalem is a priority for the cabinet and the foreign ministry.

Opening an office is a significant first step that would hopefully be succeeded by other steps such as reopening Paraguay’s embassy to Jerusalem, Katz added.

The FM affirmed that Benitez’ decision was the result of relentless efforts made by the foreign ministry in cooperation with the US administration for the sake of rapprochement between Israel and Paraguay.

Once coming to office last year, Benitez, who is of Lebanese origin, reversed a decision by former President Horacio Cartes to move the diplomatic site to Jerusalem

Back then, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to his move by closing the Israeli embassy in Paraguay and summoning the ambassador for consultations.

Israel also turned to Washington to assist it in pressuring Paraguay into altering its decision.

According to diplomatic sources in Tel Aviv, Benitez’ decision wasn’t only the result of Arab pressure but mainly disappointment with Israel after no Israeli official visited the country and no Israeli businessmen fulfilled their promises to invest there.

When Israel started to change its policy and appointed a new ambassador, the president’s approach changed as well. He took an abrupt decision by declaring Hezbollah and Hamas "terrorist organizations."



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”