Incendiary Balloon Attacks from Gaza Resume

Illustrative: An Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, November 27, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
Illustrative: An Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, November 27, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
TT
20

Incendiary Balloon Attacks from Gaza Resume

Illustrative: An Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, November 27, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
Illustrative: An Israeli airstrike in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, November 27, 2019. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)

Palestinians have resumed launching incendiary balloons from the Gaza Strip into Israeli border towns to protest the delay in implementing permanent truce agreements, according to Israeli intelligence.

The parties launching the balloons are not directly linked to Hamas Movement, which showed commitment to the agreements, said intelligence agents.

However, they said Hamas has turned a blind eye to some of their actions to exert pressure on Israel and Egypt.

“While there is no apparent change in Hamas’ position in avoiding aggravating the situation with Israel, tensions are likely to persist in the form of indiscriminate rocket fire from the Palestinian enclave toward Israel’s southern communities,” they said.

On Thursday, balloons with attached explosive devices were launched from the Strip into southern Israel, the Israeli police said.

In response, the Israeli air force struck Hamas facilities in the enclave.

The tactic of launching explosive-laden balloons from Gaza into Israel started in 2018 as part of a series of protests and riots along the Strip’s border, known collectively as the March of Return.

Hamas stopped using this technique following truce agreements between the Movement and Israel.

Israeli officials voiced concern over the possibility that tensions on Israel’s southern front with the Gaza Strip may escalate in the near future.

Meanwhile, the Hebrew-language newspaper Maariv reported that Israel believes Iran will possess a nuclear bomb within two years.

A 2020 report prepared by the Israeli Military Intelligence, known as AMAN, said that Iran is to face “challenges” soon, mainly regarding the nuclear program, but expected it to be able to produce enough uranium for only one nuclear bomb by next winter.

The report said the Israeli army believes that in the coming year Hamas will continue adhering to its understandings with Israel, with the aim of improving Gaza’s economic situation.

Concerning Hezbollah, AMAN’s report said the Lebanese party currently has very limited precision missile capabilities that are not yet operational.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.