Lebanon’s 1st Coronavirus Case Part of Social Media Jokes, Sectarian Tension

General view of Beirut. AFP file photo
General view of Beirut. AFP file photo
TT

Lebanon’s 1st Coronavirus Case Part of Social Media Jokes, Sectarian Tension

General view of Beirut. AFP file photo
General view of Beirut. AFP file photo

Only a few hours had passed since the announcement of the first case of coronavirus in Lebanon until masks disappeared from pharmacies and appeared on the black market, with some information indicating that they were exported to China.

This led to the Minister of Economy issuing a decision prohibiting the export of medical equipment, tools and personal protection items against contagious diseases, including gloves, face masks and ventilators.

One pharmacist reported that he sold more than 300 face masks within an hour of the first case being announced. He also claimed that “an atmosphere of insanity took over. People rushed to buy masks with most of them not even needing them”.

He indicated that “a face mask did not cost more than 250 Lebanese Pounds (a few US cents) the morning the first case was announced, reaching four dollars in the evening, other than advertising special face masks the price of which jumped from 3 to 30 dollars”.

The virus made its way to Lebanon’s political and sectarian tension through social media after the COVID-19 virus was found in a 45-year-old Lebanese woman who had traveled from Qom in Iran.

Lebanon’s political rivals started construing the story to their favor. The party rejecting the domination of the “resistance axis” started criticizing Iran and condemned it for exporting the virus, as if they were already waiting for the first case to come specifically from Iran so that they build on it.

On the other hand, some activists in the Free Patriotic Movement linked the coronavirus with Syrian refugees, with one of them saying on TV that “President Michel Aoun and Gebran Bassil’s warnings were on spot, how can we face the virus with the presence of Syrian refugees?”

Hezbollah supporters stood sharply against the tone of condemnation against Iran. They accused those promoting this condemnation with having racial hatred and conspiracy theories. The first instance was a voice recording allegedly by the woman who had the virus, lying at her hospital bed affirming that she was safe and that accusing her of having the virus was nothing but a conspiracy against Iran because she stayed six months in Qom. She also added that the news had spread before the results of the tests came back even though, she claimed, nothing was wrong with her.

This led some people to tweet a photo of her passport with a phrase expressing that she represents them, asking political officials to visit her so that they catch the infection.

The conspiracy theory was not limited to the camp of Iran supporters. The other side also spread a voice recording of someone claiming that “promoting the coronavirus reaching Lebanon is aimed at ending the popular uprising and continuing the repression practiced by the regime against the protesters and recruiting banks to steal the money of the Lebanese”.

The Lebanese government’s decision to ban travels to Iran, a couple of days ago, remained ambiguous despite mentioning that “flights to the quarantined areas in Iran are banned due to the spread of the coronavirus in China, Iran, South Korea and several other countries except those that are necessary for medical, educational or occupational purposes.”



Legal Threats Close in on Israel's Netanyahu, Could Impact Ongoing Wars

The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
TT

Legal Threats Close in on Israel's Netanyahu, Could Impact Ongoing Wars

The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces legal perils at home and abroad that point to a turbulent future for the Israeli leader and could influence the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, analysts and officials say.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) stunned Israel on Thursday by issuing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense chief Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the 13-month-old Gaza conflict. The bombshell came less than two weeks before Netanyahu is due to testify in a corruption trial that has dogged him for years and could end his political career if he is found guilty. He has denied any wrongdoing. While the domestic bribery trial has polarized public opinion, the prime minister has received widespread support from across the political spectrum following the ICC move, giving him a boost in troubled times.
Netanyahu has denounced the court's decision as antisemitic and denied charges that he and Gallant targeted Gazan civilians and deliberately starved them.
"Israelis get really annoyed if they think the world is against them and rally around their leader, even if he has faced a lot of criticism," said Yonatan Freeman, an international relations expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
"So anyone expecting that the ICC ruling will end this government, and what they see as a flawed (war) policy, is going to get the opposite," he added.
A senior diplomat said one initial consequence was that Israel might be less likely to reach a rapid ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon or secure a deal to bring back hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza.
"This terrible decision has ... badly harmed the chances of a deal in Lebanon and future negotiations on the issue of the hostages," said Ofir Akunis, Israel's consul general in New York.
"Terrible damage has been done because these organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas ... have received backing from the ICC and thus they are likely to make the price higher because they have the support of the ICC," he told Reuters.
While Hamas welcomed the ICC decision, there has been no indication that either it or Hezbollah see this as a chance to put pressure on Israel, which has inflicted huge losses on both groups over the past year, as well as on civilian populations.
IN THE DOCK
The ICC warrants highlight the disconnect between the way the war is viewed here and how it is seen by many abroad, with Israelis focused on their own losses and convinced the nation's army has sought to minimize civilian casualties.
Michael Oren, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States, said the ICC move would likely harden resolve and give the war cabinet license to hit Gaza and Lebanon harder still.
"There's a strong strand of Israeli feeling that runs deep, which says 'if we're being condemned for what we are doing, we might just as well go full gas'," he told Reuters.
While Netanyahu has received wide support at home over the ICC action, the same is not true of the domestic graft case, where he is accused of bribery, breach of trust and fraud.
The trial opened in 2020 and Netanyahu is finally scheduled to take the stand next month after the court rejected his latest request to delay testimony on the grounds that he had been too busy overseeing the war to prepare his defense.
He was due to give evidence last year but the date was put back because of the war. His critics have accused him of prolonging the Gaza conflict to delay judgment day and remain in power, which he denies. Always a divisive figure in Israel, public trust in Netanyahu fell sharply in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas assault on southern Israel that caught his government off guard, cost around 1,200 lives.
Israel's subsequent campaign has killed more than 44,000 people and displaced nearly all Gaza's population at least once, triggering a humanitarian catastrophe, according to Gaza officials.
The prime minister has refused advice from the state attorney general to set up an independent commission into what went wrong and Israel's subsequent conduct of the war.
He is instead looking to establish an inquiry made up only of politicians, which critics say would not provide the sort of accountability demanded by the ICC.
Popular Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth said the failure to order an independent investigation had prodded the ICC into action. "Netanyahu preferred to take the risk of arrest warrants, just as long as he did not have to form such a commission," it wrote on Friday.
ARREST THREAT
The prime minister faces a difficult future living under the shadow of an ICC warrant, joining the ranks of only a few leaders to have suffered similar humiliation, including Libya's Muammar Gaddafi and Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic.
It also means he risks arrest if he travels to any of the court's 124 signatory states, including most of Europe.
One place he can safely visit is the United States, which is not a member of the ICC, and Israeli leaders hope US President-elect Donald Trump will bring pressure to bear by imposing sanctions on ICC officials.
Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for national security advisor, has already promised tough action: "You can expect a strong response to the antisemitic bias of the ICC & UN come January,” he wrote on X on Friday. In the meantime, Israeli officials are talking to their counterparts in Western capitals, urging them to ignore the arrest warrants, as Hungary has already promised to do.
However, the charges are not going to disappear soon, if at all, meaning fellow leaders will be increasingly reluctant to have relations with Netanyahu, said Yuval Shany, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute.
"In a very direct sense, there is going to be more isolation for the Israeli state going forward," he told Reuters.