The Pros and Cons of 'Working From Home' in Saudi Arabia

Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
TT

The Pros and Cons of 'Working From Home' in Saudi Arabia

Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)

Quarantine at home has changed several cultures, notions, and convictions that would have otherwise been difficult to change had they not been necessary precautions under the current crisis. Even if these changes are temporary, they could be the beginning of a new post-Corona stage.

Saudi Arabians have spent more than two months in home quarantine, changing their sitting areas into temporary workspaces to work uninterrupted in several sectors and domains despite the challenges and obstacles that the pandemic has created.

Despite being short, this period of working “remotely” has changed ideas and convictions. After some thought that it was difficult to work remotely, another conviction surfaced that sees working remotely to be easier, saving both time and money across different sectors. This has opened a new transformative phase in the work environment in Saudi Arabia, especially after international companies issued decisions to convert to working remotely even after the pandemic ends.

Saudis began working remotely on 18 March after the government issued a decision to shut down all sectors and impose working from home.

Before that, in January, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development launched a remote working program that aimed to bridge the gap between employers and job seekers after the latter suffered from several obstacles in finding job opportunities. This program, however, was not large-scale but was limited to those who face transportation difficulties.

In this last period, meetings have shifted from offices and meeting rooms to remote meeting software in different sectors, including ministerial and large and small company meetings.

Rouaa al-Mehanna sees that most notable advantages of remote working are more flexibility and concentration, despite some managers feeling that completing one’s tasks outside of the workplace is like a vacation or leads to a lower quality of work which then leads to more pressure even after the eight-hour workday stipulated by Saudi labor laws is over.

These meetings have opened up primary themes for the future of the work sector after the coronavirus pandemic, especially that there is an ongoing experiment that is yet to end and has proven its high effectiveness in different sectors and jobs. This compels us to rethink the future of jobs and to change how we conduct them and how workspaces are organized, shrinking some offices while entirely getting rid of others. This may have several advantages, including saving time and effort, avoiding traffic, among others.

Also, there were clear implications on several sectors that were unable to convert to remote working and endure the crisis, leading to a decline in their productivity after their work teams were dispersed.



Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)

It is difficult to predict what the outcomes will be of the discussions between Iran, France, Britain and Germany about Tehran’s nuclear program in Geneva on Friday.

Last week, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution again ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a "comprehensive" report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States, which proposed the resolution, dismissed as insufficient and insincere a last-minute Iranian move to cap its stock of uranium that is close to weapons-grade. Diplomats said Iran's move was conditional on scrapping the resolution.

Iran has been weighing its response to the censure, debating whether to increase uranium enrichment or by being open to the proposals expected at the Geneva talks.

The discussions may seek a new nuclear deal instead of the 2015 one with Tehran that is in tatters.

As it stands, Iran is likely to opt for negotiations instead of escalation due to a number of internal, regional and international reasons.

Diplomatic sources in Paris noted US President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments of officials handling Middle East affairs, underscoring their unreserved support to Israel and clear hostility to Iran.

These appointments may lead Iran to think twice before resorting to any escalation.

Even before Trump has taken office, his circles have said that the new president will take “several executive decisions related to Iran and that will be declared on his first day in office.” The decisions will be binding and do not need Congress’ approval.

However, Trump is unpredictable and the sources did not rule out the surprise possibility of him striking a deal with Iran related to its nuclear program and behavior in the Middle East. This means that Tehran will have to make major concessions, including abandoning its policy of “exporting the revolution”.

This remains a far-fatched possibility, however. In all likelihood, Washington under Trump will return to his “maximum pressure” policy against Iran on political, diplomatic and economic levels to make it return to the negotiations table and agree on a deal that completely ends its nuclear ambitions.

So, at the Geneva meeting on Friday, Tehran will seek to achieve two main goals: a nuclear breakthrough during what remains of US President Joe Biden’s time in office, and attempt to lure the European powers away from Trump.

The truth is that Tehran is wading in the unknown. One only has to go back to Trump’s past statements about how Israel should have struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during its October 26 attack on the country.

Trump has already shown Iran his hardline stance when he ordered the assassination of Quds Forces leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport in January 2020.

Based on this, Tehran is scrambling to avert a joint American-Israeli strike that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dreaming of.

Iran is vulnerable now due to two main reasons: the Israeli strike in October weakened Iran’s air defenses and Netanyahu has said that Israeli jets can now run rampant over Iran without any worries.

And Tehran can no longer rely on its allied militias to threaten Israel with all-out war. Hamas in Gaza is no longer in a position to threaten Israel and neither is Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So, Iran now finds itself exposed and would rather turn to negotiations with Europe than risk escalation that would cost it dearly with Israel now that it can no longer rely on Hamas and Hezbollah.