Syrian Regime Orders Seizure of Rami Makhlouf’s Shares in 12 Banks

The document showing the decision of Damascus Securities Exchange to seize the shares of Rami Makhlouf. Asharq Al-Awsat
The document showing the decision of Damascus Securities Exchange to seize the shares of Rami Makhlouf. Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Syrian Regime Orders Seizure of Rami Makhlouf’s Shares in 12 Banks

The document showing the decision of Damascus Securities Exchange to seize the shares of Rami Makhlouf. Asharq Al-Awsat
The document showing the decision of Damascus Securities Exchange to seize the shares of Rami Makhlouf. Asharq Al-Awsat

The Damascus Securities Exchange (DSE) ordered on Wednesday the seizure of shares owned by Rami Makhlouf, the cousin of Syria’s president and one of the country’s richest tycoons, in 12 foreign banks with local branches.

The decision affected his shares in Lebanon’s Audi Bank, Byblos Bank and Fransabank, the Jordan-based Arab Bank and others.

This is the latest in a string of measures taken against the tycoon.

The DSE decision, which Asharq Al-Awsat obtained a copy of, is based on a "precautionary seizure" of the assets of the businessman signed by Syrian Finance Minister Mamoun Hamdan.

The government-ordered seizure of assets of Makhlouf and his family is to guarantee the payment of what is owed to the state by his company Syriatel. In addition to the seizure, the regime has also reportedly banned Makhlouf from bidding on government contracts for five years.

The Syrian Telecommunication Regulatory Authority has demanded that Makhlouf pays around $185 million back in taxes before May 5. Since then, a pressure campaign that targeted senior employees in Makhlouf’s companies and networks had been launched.

The Syrian regime has stripped Makhlouf of his privileges, such as security detail which protected him and his palace.

From his palace in the Yafour suburb near Damascus, Makhlouf has been leading negotiations with the Syrian government. On Monday, he was informed that he would have to give up Syriatel to the country’s “Martyr’s Fund” and that he needs to bring back home billions of dollars from foreign banks to contribute in solving the national economic crisis.

On the other hand, Makhlouf showed "unprecedented obstinacy" and the use of "religious discourse", while accepting to pay the required dues from Syriatel to the government in installments.



France Declines to Comment on Algeria’s Anger over Recognition of Morocco’s Claim over Sahara

French President Emmanuel Macron and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune. (AFP file)
French President Emmanuel Macron and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune. (AFP file)
TT

France Declines to Comment on Algeria’s Anger over Recognition of Morocco’s Claim over Sahara

French President Emmanuel Macron and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune. (AFP file)
French President Emmanuel Macron and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune. (AFP file)

Paris declined to comment on Algeria’s “strong condemnation” of the French government’s decision to recognize Morocco’s claim over the Sahara.

The office of the French Foreign Ministry refused to respond to an AFP request for a comment on the Algeria’s stance.

It did say that further comments could impact the trip Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune is set to make to France in late September or early October.

The visit has been postponed on numerous occasions over disagreements between the two countries.

France had explicitly expressed its constant and clear support for the autonomy rule proposal over the Sahara during Foreign Minister Stephane Sejourne’s visit to Morocco in February, reported AFP.

The position has helped improve ties between Rabat and Paris.

On Thursday, the Algerian Foreign Ministry expressed “great regret and strong denunciation" about the French government's decision to recognize an autonomy plan for the Western Sahara region "within Moroccan sovereignty”.

Algeria was informed of the decision by France in recent days, an Algerian foreign ministry statement added.

The ministry also said Algeria would draw all the consequences from the decision and hold the French government alone completely responsible.