Retired General Urges US to Act in Libya Before it’s Too Late

Retired US Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas Trask.
Retired US Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas Trask.
TT

Retired General Urges US to Act in Libya Before it’s Too Late

Retired US Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas Trask.
Retired US Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas Trask.

Libya is escalating into a destabilizing proxy war worsened by America’s often confusing and consistently hands-off approach.

The United States can no longer afford such an attitude, which escalates the fighting and offers Turkey and Russia strategic footholds in the Eastern Mediterranean, warned retired US Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas Trask in an op-ed published by The National Interest on Monday.

Trask said that Washington is “proud” to partner with the UN-backed, Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) “despite it being an Islamist-dominated regime with little hope of uniting the country.”

“American diplomats have led no charge to address the fighting. Instead, they mostly echo European initiatives for a ceasefire or, most recently, have begun coordinating policy with Turkey. Turkey and Russia are pouring into this vacuum,” he noted.

“Backers on both sides could simply keep flooding reinforcements into the country, producing an ever-bloodier stalemate. By worsening the security vacuum and physical destruction inside Libya, this would enable ISIS to regrow and worsen the spread of coronavirus countrywide —either or both of which could drive renewed refugee flows toward Europe,” he wrote.

Trask added that “Turkey and Russia could tacitly divide Libya between themselves, and could mimic the Astana process they initiated to determine Syria’s fate without US input. The two already are in close contact, including discussing plans for a settlement.”

“Such an agreement would logically appeal to both Ankara and Moscow, in no small part, because it would create so many problems for the United States and allies,” he continued.

“A sphere of influence in Libya would represent Erdogan’s first success in propping up the Muslim Brotherhood around the region – a policy which has threatened most every US Middle East ally. Equally important, it would encourage further gunboat diplomacy by bolstering Ankara’s claims, however illegitimate, to the energy-rich waters between Turkey and Libya. This would directly threaten energy development by Greece, Cyprus, Israel and Egypt, all of whom Washington sees as helping reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian natural gas,” according to Trask.

Moreover, he said the “de facto partition of Libya could appeal to Moscow for the same reason. As with Syria, Libya also provides a valuable beachhead ringing NATO’s southern flank, especially if Russia installs advanced air defenses or other weaponry.”

Trask stressed that the United States must appoint a special envoy for the Eastern Mediterranean to devise a negotiated solution to the Libya conflict. Among his or her top priorities would be limiting Ankara’s support for the GNA, including leveraging the option to redeploy US military assets out of Turkey.



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.