Algeria’s Justice and Development Front: Constitutional Amendments Destroy Islam

Leader of Justice and Development Front (FJD) Abdallah Djaballah (File photo: AFP)
Leader of Justice and Development Front (FJD) Abdallah Djaballah (File photo: AFP)
TT
20

Algeria’s Justice and Development Front: Constitutional Amendments Destroy Islam

Leader of Justice and Development Front (FJD) Abdallah Djaballah (File photo: AFP)
Leader of Justice and Development Front (FJD) Abdallah Djaballah (File photo: AFP)

The leader of the Algerian Islamist Justice and Development Front, Abdallah Djaballah, said the constitutional draft amendment has been proposed by figures aiming to secularize the society and destroy Islam.

The Movement of Society for Peace as well as a number of opposition parties have rejected the proposed amendments over issues relating to identity and Islam.

The draft is expected to be referred to the parliament for a vote, after which it will be submitted for a referendum by the end of the year.

Presidential aide Mohammed Laqab has previously announced that the text has been drafted in French and then translated to Arabic, which angered the Islamist movements and conservatives.

The constitutional amendment creates a new position for the vice president, and replaces the “first minister” with a prime minister appointed by the president, and not named by a parliamentary majority.

It also proposes replacing the “constitutional court” with the “constitutional council.”

In a statement, Djaballah slammed the draft amendment, saying its clauses contradict the references of the Algerian Muslim people.

He said it was based on the corrupt Western and French thought, which can’t maintain the interests of Algerians, their rights and freedoms.

Djaballah protested the mechanisms adopted in drafting the text, which he said were determined by secular elites.

He explained that the draft was sent to nearly 2,000 parties, organizations, and figures, while giving the constitutional committee the right to accept or reject their comments.

The Islamist leader indicated that the process contradicted the public service duty in consulting specialists. He noted that the committee aims to impose its own project that runs against the nation’s principles, and threatens its language, unity and sovereignty.

Political activists have called for modifying article 2 of the constitution which states “Islam is the religion of the state,” on the pretext that it “excludes Algerians of other faiths.”

Algerians were also divided on another article which declares the Amazigh as well as Arabic as "a national and official language of the state.”

The Justice and Development Front called for replacing the committee of 15 constitutional experts, with a committee of competent figures with different specialties.

It stressed that the new committee should set a new draft constitution that respects the principles of the people and maintains the achievements of the 1954 revolution and the protests of February 2019, which ousted former president Abdelaziz Bouteflika.

The committee should establish legitimate institutions that meet the ambitions of Algerians in achieving justice, equality, freedom, and progress, according to the Front.



US Sends Beirut ‘Warning’ and ‘Incentive’ Over Hezbollah Arms

US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
TT
20

US Sends Beirut ‘Warning’ and ‘Incentive’ Over Hezbollah Arms

US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)

US special envoy Tom Barrack delivered a dual message of “incentive” and “warning” to the Lebanese capital this week, urging swift action on the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons.

“You have Israel on one side, you have Iran on the other, and now you have Syria manifesting itself so quickly that if Lebanon doesn’t move, it’s going to be Bilad Al Sham again,” he said, using the historical name for the Syria region.

The remarks sparked alarm within Lebanon’s political establishment, with some interpreting the comments as a blunt warning of “existential danger.”

Government sources told Asharq al-Awsat that Barrack, who also serves as Washington’s ambassador to Türkiye and was previously tasked with Syria policy, appears to be approaching the Lebanon and Syria files through a unified lens.

“Barrack believes that Lebanon should follow the same diplomatic path as Syria,” one official said, referring to Damascus' recent re-engagement with regional and international actors. “But he also understands Lebanon’s complex political terrain.”

Barrack’s comments about Lebanon potentially “returning to Bilad Al Sham” provoked criticism across the political spectrum, prompting him to clarify his position in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

“My comments yesterday praised Syria’s impressive strides, not a threat to Lebanon,” wrote Barrack.

“I observed the reality that Syria is moving at light speed to seize the historic opportunity presented by President Donald Trump lifting of sanctions: investment from Türkiye and the Gulf, diplomatic outreach to neighboring countries, and a clear vision for the future,” he added.

He said Syria’s leadership is “seeking coexistence and shared prosperity with Lebanon based on sovereign equality,” and stressed that the United States supports a bilateral relationship that promotes “peace, prosperity, and mutual respect” between the two nations.

“I can assure that Syria’s leaders only want co-existence and mutual prosperity with Lebanon, and the United States is committed to supporting that relationship between two equal and sovereign neighbors enjoying peace and prosperity,” said Barrack.

Barrack, in the context of disarming Hezbollah, had stated that a successful approach requires a combination of "carrots and sticks". This means using both positive incentives (carrots) and negative consequences (sticks) to achieve the desired outcome.

Barrack’s recent warning to Lebanon reflects the “stick” Washington is wielding, while his unprecedented acknowledgment of Hezbollah’s dual structure signals the “carrot” being offered.

“This is the first time a US official publicly distinguishes between Hezbollah’s political and military wings,” one source told Asharq al-Awsat.

“It’s a message of inducement aimed directly at Hezbollah, despite the fact that Washington has long treated both branches as inseparable and placed them under the same sanctions regime,” they explained.

In remarks to the press, Barrack reiterated the US designation of Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, but added nuance rarely heard from senior American officials.