Coronavirus, Sanctions Hit Iran’s Support of Iraq Proxies

A PMF member in Iraq. Reuters file photo
A PMF member in Iraq. Reuters file photo
TT
20

Coronavirus, Sanctions Hit Iran’s Support of Iraq Proxies

A PMF member in Iraq. Reuters file photo
A PMF member in Iraq. Reuters file photo

Iran’s financial and military support for its proxy paramilitary groups in Iraq, a linchpin of its regional foreign policy, has been dramatically disrupted by the coronavirus pandemic and US sanctions, according to people familiar with the matter.

Interruptions caused by the virus, including border closings to prevent the spread of the disease, have drastically cut Tehran’s cash supplies to the militia groups in recent months, said three Iraqi paramilitary group commanders and a regional official familiar with Iran’s activities in Iraq.

The funds from Iran are typically allocated for military operations related to the paramilitary groups’ activities such as fighting Iran’s opponents, including attacks against US targets, the three commanders said.

Since the coronavirus hit earlier this year, Iran has reduced its monthly payments to each of the four top militia groups in Iraq to between $2 million and $3 million from $4.5 million to $5 million, said one of the commanders, who belongs to a powerful paramilitary group.

The reduced funding has impacted operations of the militia groups and is forcing them to seek alternative sources of funding for military operations and weapons such as from their own business interests, the commanders said.

Iraq shares a border with Iran, a coronavirus epicenter in the Middle East with more than 11,000 reported deaths, according to a Reuters tally.

Disruptions brought on by the pandemic come on top of a squeeze on Tehran’s financing of the paramilitary groups over the past two years caused by US sanctions on Iran, said the three commanders and the regional official.

The regional official said Tehran’s funding of the groups has dropped by millions of dollars. The sanctions combined with the coronavirus crisis and a decline in oil prices have helped force Iran, which faces a large budget deficit, to limit its military spending including on the Revolutionary Guards.

US Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook agreed that US sanctions were having an impact on Iran’s funding of paramilitary groups, saying it was "further evidence that our campaign of maximum pressure is successfully depriving the (Iranian) regime of revenue to fund its terror proxies and other destabilizing actions across the region."

The squeeze on militia financing also follows the killing of Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani, who died in a US drone strike in Baghdad in January. The loss of the senior military commander, who created an Iran-aligned axis of influence across the Middle East and steered political allies in Iraq, has dealt a blow to the operations of paramilitary groups and Iran’s broader aims in Iraq, according to the three commanders as well as the regional official and a senior Iranian diplomat.

The Iran-backed paramilitary groups helped the Iraqi government defeat ISIS in 2017. They have dominated the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), an Iraqi state-controlled institution that is an umbrella grouping of militias, including and smaller Shiite groups that object to Iranian dominance. The PMF was formally integrated into Iraq’s armed forces and has led many security operations.

A PMF spokesman, Muhannad al-Aqabi, declined to comment on any issues to do with groups backed directly by Iran. The PMF receives funding and equipment through official channels via the Iraqi state, even if the ultimate source of the money is often Iran, Aqabi said.

A spokesman at the public relations office of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps denied that Iran finances the militias.

“Iran has always supported the oppressed people in the region and beyond and our policy has not changed. But we do not provide financial support to those who fight against America’s hegemony in our region.”

When asked by Reuters whether Iran’s financial and military support of Iraqi paramilitaries had declined, Alireza Miryousefi, a spokesman for Iran’s mission to the United Nations in New York, said: “These rumors are designed to sow discord between the two nations and are doomed to fail.”

He added that Iran is “fully supportive” of the Iraqi government and that the two countries “engage closely in all matters of mutual interest” but that Iran doesn’t interfere in its neighbor's internal affairs.



North Korea Says It Has Repaired Its Damaged Second Destroyer, a Claim Met with Outside Skepticism 

A photo released by the official North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (Center-R) and his daughter Kim Ju Ae (Center-L) attending the launch ceremony of a destroyer named Kang Kon at the Rajin shipyard in Rason, North Korea, 12 June 2025 (issued 13 June 2025). (EPA)
A photo released by the official North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (Center-R) and his daughter Kim Ju Ae (Center-L) attending the launch ceremony of a destroyer named Kang Kon at the Rajin shipyard in Rason, North Korea, 12 June 2025 (issued 13 June 2025). (EPA)
TT
20

North Korea Says It Has Repaired Its Damaged Second Destroyer, a Claim Met with Outside Skepticism 

A photo released by the official North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (Center-R) and his daughter Kim Ju Ae (Center-L) attending the launch ceremony of a destroyer named Kang Kon at the Rajin shipyard in Rason, North Korea, 12 June 2025 (issued 13 June 2025). (EPA)
A photo released by the official North Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) shows North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (Center-R) and his daughter Kim Ju Ae (Center-L) attending the launch ceremony of a destroyer named Kang Kon at the Rajin shipyard in Rason, North Korea, 12 June 2025 (issued 13 June 2025). (EPA)

North Korea said Friday it has repaired its damaged second naval destroyer and launched it into the water in the presence of leader Kim Jong Un, about three weeks after it capsized during an earlier, botched launch ceremony.

The North’s Korean Central News Agency said Friday it launched the destroyer — the second it built this year — off its east coast Thursday.

The country's extremely secretive nature makes it virtually impossible to independently confirm its announcement on the ship’s repair. Outside observers doubt whether the ship’s engine, weapons systems and other electronic equipment can function normally, as parts of the warship were submerged for about two weeks.

North Korea's failed launch on May 21 sparked fury from Kim, who has vowed to build a stronger navy to cope with what he calls escalating US-led threats against his country. Kim said the incident was caused by criminal negligence and ordered officials to repair the warship before a ruling Workers’ Party meeting in late June. North Korean authorities later detained four officials, including the vice director of the Workers’ Party’s munitions industry department over the botched launch.

In a launch ceremony, Kim said the country’s two destroyers will play a big role in improving the North Korean navy’s operational capabilities, according to KCNA.

Kim reiterated previous claims that his naval buildup is a justified response to perceived threats posed by the US and South Korea, which in recent years have expanded their combined military exercises and updated their deterrence strategies to counter Kim’s advancing nuclear program. He said the North will respond to such external threats with “overwhelming military action.”

“It will not be long before the enemy nations themselves experience just how provoking and unpleasant it is to sit back and watch as our warships freely move near the edges of their sovereign waters,” Kim said.

During his speech, Kim said a North Korean shipyard worker died during the repairs and offered his “deepest condolences” to his family, including his wife and son who were present at the launch event.

Outside experts earlier said it remained unclear how severely the 5,000-ton-class destroyer was damaged and questioned North Korea's claim that it needed 10 days to pump out the seawater, set the ship upright and fix its damages that it described as “not serious.”

Previous satellite photos showed the North Korean destroyer lying on its side at the northeastern port of Chongjin, with its stern partly under water. Last week, North Korea said it had righted the warship and would move it to the Rajin port, which is further north of Chongjin and close to the border with Russia, for the next stage of its restoration works.

“Considering the time they needed to raise the vessel, they would have had less than two weeks to carry out the real repair work,” said Yang Uk, an analyst at Seoul’s Asan Institute for Policy Studies. “Would that have been enough time to completely fix everything and bring the vessel to a state where it’s operationally capable? I think that’s highly unlikely.”

Lee Illwoo, an expert with the Korea Defense Network in South Korea, said what was likely flooded in the North Korean ship were its engine room, missile launch tubes and anti-air weapons systems, which all involve electronic systems that are highly vulnerable to damages if exposed to seawater.

Lee said the ship's move to Rajin implies Russian experts have likely been assisting North Korea with repairs.

Military cooperation between North Korea and Russia has been flourishing significantly in recent years, with the North supplying troops and ammunitions to support Russia's war against Ukraine.

Kim wants a bigger navy

The damaged warship was in the same class as the country’s first destroyer unveiled in April, which experts assessed as the North’s largest and most advanced warship to date. Experts say the North's two destroyers were both likely built with Russian help.

Kim said the ruling Workers’ Party has confirmed plans to build two more 5,000-ton-class destroyers next year, according to Friday's KCNA dispatch.

Satellite imagery indicated North Korea had attempted to launch the second destroyer sideways, a method it had never used for warships. Many observers said it would be more difficult to maintain the balance of a big warship because it carries heavy weapons systems. But they said North Korea won't likely repeat the same mistake when it launches its third and fourth destroyers.

According to North Korea's timetable, its first two destroyers are to be deployed next year.

Despite its growing nuclear arsenal and huge 1.2 million-member standing army, North Korea's naval and aerial forces have been considered inferior to those of South Korea's. But North Korea's planned deployment of a series of 5,000-ton-class destroyers would pose “really a serious threat” to South Korea, whose navy hasn't still prepared itself to deal with such big, advanced enemy warships, according to Lee, the expert.

Earlier this week, the new liberal South Korean government led by President Lee Jae-myung halted frontline propaganda broadcasts as its first concrete step toward easing tensions between the rivals. North Korea hasn't responded formally to the measure.