It’s Time to Re-Re-Re-Meet the Muppets

In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
TT

It’s Time to Re-Re-Re-Meet the Muppets

In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.
In a nod to the original “Muppet Show,” “Muppets Now” features sketches set at Muppet Labs. Among the inventions tested there is the Infern-O-Matic, which reduces everyday items to piles of ashes.

At the dawn of “The Muppet Show” in the late 1970s, a visit to the Muppet Labs consisted of watching its nebbishy proprietor, Dr. Bunsen Honeydew, demonstrate misbegotten inventions like an exploding hat or a self-destructing necktie with a brief burst of pyrotechnics, a canned explosion sound and a puff of smoke.

Today, a return visit to those labs on the Disney+ series “Muppets Now” features Honeydew and his agitated assistant, Beaker, using a homemade device called the Infern-O-Matic to reduce everyday items — a carton of eggs, a wall clock, a guitar — to smoldering piles of ashes.

If this scene from “Muppets Now” feels manic and combustible — and even a bit familiar — that is by design: as Leigh Slaughter, vice president of the Muppets Studio, explained recently, she and her colleagues are hopeful that this series will conjure up “that true Muppet anarchy — that complete chaos.”

She added: “If they’re going to take on real-world science, we thought, we have to burn things. We have to drop things. We have to blow things up.”

“Muppets Now,” a six-episode series that debuts on July 31, is both Disney’s attempt to bring those familiar, fuzzy faces to its streaming service and a parody of internet content. Its segments feature characters like Miss Piggy and the Swedish Chef in rapid-fire comedy sketches that lampoon popular online formats.

The new series also strives to reconnect the Muppets with the disorderly sensibility they embodied in the era of “The Muppet Show” and get back to basics after other recent efforts to reboot the characters fizzled out.

“The thinking is to stop trying so hard to be like everybody else and just be the Muppets,” said Bill Barretta, a veteran Muppet performer and an executive producer of “Muppets Now.” “Let’s celebrate the fact that they all have to deal with each other and just be silly and play and entertain again.”

Nearly 45 years after its debut, “The Muppet Show” (which originally ran in syndication from 1976 to 1981) remains a high-water mark for the franchise. Fueled by the subversive imagination of the Muppets creator, Jim Henson, and a small band of like-minded performers and writers, it was a backstage showbiz satire bolstered by kitschy celebrity hosts and a madcap attitude inherited from sketch shows like “Saturday Night Live” (where the Muppets had previously appeared) and “Monty Python’s Flying Circus.”

The popularity of “The Muppet Show” paved the way for hit films like “The Muppet Movie” (1979) which tempered the mayhem of the TV series with a sentimental streak and endeared founding performers like Henson and Frank Oz to a generation of viewers.

But keeping the Muppets relevant to modern audiences has proved elusive, particularly since they were acquired by Disney in 2004. (The Muppet characters created for “Sesame Street” remain the property of Sesame Workshop, a nonprofit organization, while other shows like “Fraggle Rock” are owned by the Jim Henson Company.)

A 2011 film, “The Muppets,” written by Nicholas Stoller and Jason Segel (“Forgetting Sarah Marshall”) was a critical and commercial hit that won an Academy Award for its song “Man or Muppet,” written by Bret McKenzie. But a 2014 follow-up, “Muppets Most Wanted,” was a disappointment and quickly curtailed the revival.

In 2015, an ABC sitcom called “The Muppets” drew attention for its single-camera mockumentary style (similar to shows like “The Office”) and a plotline in which Kermit and Miss Piggy broke up. But the show was not well-received; it was troubled by staff changes and canceled after one season.

Barretta, who plays Muppets like Rowlf the Dog and Pepe the King Prawn, said the approach of that sitcom “was too much, too stereotypical of the characters.”

Dan Silver, who is vice president of original unscripted content for Disney+, agreed that serialized plot twists were not necessarily going to bring viewers back to the Muppets. “Sometimes it’s not about if Piggy and Kermit are going to get together,” he said. “It’s about, how does that make something funny in a skit?”

The Muppets have had other contemporary successes that seemed to point to a path forward, including a 2009 viral video in which they performed Queen’s pop-rock operetta “Bohemian Rhapsody,” and a live show presented at the Hollywood Bowl (in 2017) and London’s O2 Arena (in 2018).

Eric Jacobson, a Muppets performer who now plays Fozzie and Miss Piggy, said that the live concerts were a crucial step in steering the puppet troupe back to its fundamental values.

“They were very collaborative experiences,” Jacobson said of the shows, which included classic Muppets numbers like “Mahna Mahna” and “Rainbow Connection.”

“There was a real conscious effort to go back to the Muppets’ roots, to play up the personalities and that sense of abandon that people really respond to,” he added.

Last year, Disney announced that it was working with the Muppets Studio to create a new sketch show. (Another planned Muppets series being prepared by Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis of “Once Upon a Time” and Josh Gad of “Frozen” was halted around this time amid creative differences.)

Silver, the Disney+ executive, said that “Muppets Now” should reflect the elasticity of the underlying property. Like Mickey Mouse or the Simpsons, he said, the Muppets are meant to “live among us — they’re not a nostalgia play, they just exist in whatever time we’re in.”

What makes the Muppets work, he said, can be found in something as rudimentary as the early test footage for “The Muppet Movie” that shows Henson and Oz roaming the countryside as they ad-lib dialogue for Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy and Fozzie Bear.

“It’s just Jim and Frank figuring out, how do you put them in the real world outside a studio?” Silver said. “It’s completely improvised and it’s hilarious. The whole framework was there. It just needed to be appropriated into today.”

The structure of “Muppets Now,” he said, was also suggested by going back to the early days and taking a cue from the original “Muppet Show,” which was in part a sendup of comedy-variety programs of the 1960s and 70s. As Silver put it: “If ‘The Muppet Show’ was a subversion of Sonny and Cher and Ed Sullivan, what would that be in this day and age? And the answer is YouTube.”

Taking the programming formats of streaming video and populating them with its antic characters, “Muppets Now” gives us segments like a beauty and lifestyle video blog hosted by Miss Piggy; a cooking competition with the Swedish Chef; and a high-octane Muppet Labs science test with Dr. Honeydew and Beaker.

Most of the sketches were filmed last summer, amid a process that the Muppet performers said was collaborative and open to a wide range of inputs.

“When we’re on set, there is discussion among the Muppet performers with the writer and the producer and director,” said Matt Vogel, who plays Kermit the Frog.

“We’ll talk it through before we shoot something,” Vogel said, “and even when we’re shooting things, the Muppet performers are pretty adept at ad-libbing as long as it’s character-appropriate.”

Still, some remaining footage for interstitial segments was produced during the coronavirus pandemic. This required performers to record themselves at home and required spouses, partners and children to lend a hand or keep quiet during their creation.

The New York Times



Blake Lively Sues ‘It Ends With Us’ Director Justin Baldoni Alleging Harassment and Smear Campaign

Blake Lively attends the LACMA Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2024. (AFP)
Blake Lively attends the LACMA Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2024. (AFP)
TT

Blake Lively Sues ‘It Ends With Us’ Director Justin Baldoni Alleging Harassment and Smear Campaign

Blake Lively attends the LACMA Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2024. (AFP)
Blake Lively attends the LACMA Art+Film Gala at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles, California, on November 2, 2024. (AFP)

Actor Blake Lively sued "It Ends With Us" director Justin Baldoni and several others tied to the romantic drama on Tuesday, alleging harassment and a coordinated campaign to attack her reputation for coming forward about her treatment on the set.

The federal lawsuit was filed in New York just hours after Baldoni and many of the other defendants in Lively's suit sued The New York Times for libel for its story on her allegations, saying the newspaper and the star were the ones conducting a coordinated smear campaign.

The lawsuits are major developments in a story emerging from the surprise hit film that has already made major waves in Hollywood and led to discussions of the treatment of female actors both on sets and in media.

Lively's suit said that Baldoni, the film's production company Wayfarer Studios and others engaged in "a carefully crafted, coordinated, and resourced retaliatory scheme to silence her, and others, from speaking out."

She accuses Baldoni and the studio of embarking on a "multi-tiered plan" to damage her reputation following a meeting in which she and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, addressed "repeated sexual harassment and other disturbing behavior" by Baldoni and a producer Jamey Heath, who is also named in both lawsuits.

The plan, the suit said, included a proposal to plant theories on online message boards, engineer a social media campaign and place news stories critical of Lively.

The alleged mistreatment on set included comments from Baldoni on the bodies of Lively and other women on the set.

Baldoni's attorney Bryan Freedman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Lively's lawsuit. But he previously called the same allegations "completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious."

Lively's lawsuit comes the same day as the libel lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court by Baldoni and others against the Times seeking at least $250 million. The Times stood by its reporting and said it plans to "vigorously defend" against the lawsuit.

Others who are defendants in Lively's suit and plaintiffs in the libel suit include Wayfarer and crisis communications expert Melissa Nathan, whose text message was quoted in the headline of the Dec. 21 Times story: "‘We Can Bury Anyone’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine."

Written by Megan Twohey, Mike McIntire and Julie Tate, the story was published just after Lively filed a legal complaint with the California Civil Rights Department, a predecessor to her new lawsuit.

The libel lawsuit says the newspaper "relied almost entirely on Lively’s unverified and self-serving narrative, lifting it nearly verbatim while disregarding an abundance of evidence that contradicted her claims and exposed her true motives. But the Times did not care."

A spokesperson for the Times, Danielle Rhoades, said in a statement that "our story was meticulously and responsibly reported."

"It was based on a review of thousands of pages of original documents, including the text messages and emails that we quote accurately and at length in the article. To date, Wayfarer Studios, Mr. Baldoni, the other subjects of the article and their representatives have not pointed to a single error," the statement said.

But Baldoni's lawsuit says that "If the Times truly reviewed the thousands of private communications it claimed to have obtained, its reporters would have seen incontrovertible evidence that it was Lively, not Plaintiffs, who engaged in a calculated smear campaign."

Lively is not a defendant in the libel lawsuit. Her lawyers said in a statement that "Nothing in this lawsuit changes anything about the claims advanced in Ms. Lively’s California Civil Rights Department Complaint, nor her federal complaint, filed earlier today."

The romantic drama "It Ends With Us," an adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling 2016 novel, was released in August, exceeding box office expectations with a $50 million debut. But the movie’s release was shrouded by speculation over discord between Lively and Baldoni. Baldoni took a backseat in promoting the film while Lively took centerstage along with Reynolds, who was on the press circuit for "Deadpool & Wolverine" at the same time.

Lively came to fame through the 2005 film "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants," and bolstered her stardom on the TV series "Gossip Girl" from 2007 to 2012. She has since starred in films including "The Town" and "The Shallows."

Baldoni starred in the TV comedy "Jane the Virgin," directed the 2019 film "Five Feet Apart" and wrote "Man Enough," a book pushing back against traditional notions of masculinity. He responded to concerns that "It Ends With Us" romanticized domestic violence, telling the AP at the time that critics were "absolutely entitled to that opinion."

He was dropped by his agency, WME, immediately after Lively filed her complaint and the Times published its story. The agency represents both Lively and Reynolds.

Baldoni's attorney, Freedman, said in a statement on the libel suit that "the New York Times cowered to the wants and whims of two powerful ‘untouchable’ Hollywood elites."

"In doing so, they pre-determined the outcome of their story, and aided and abetted their own devastating PR smear campaign designed to revitalize Lively’s self-induced floundering public image and counter the organic groundswell of criticism amongst the online public," he added. "The irony is rich."