Assassination of Fatah Official Raises Fear of Chaos in West Bank

Palestinian police officers in Bethlehem in the West Bank stand guard outside the Church of the Nativity that was closed as a preventive measure against the coronavirus (Reuters)
Palestinian police officers in Bethlehem in the West Bank stand guard outside the Church of the Nativity that was closed as a preventive measure against the coronavirus (Reuters)
TT

Assassination of Fatah Official Raises Fear of Chaos in West Bank

Palestinian police officers in Bethlehem in the West Bank stand guard outside the Church of the Nativity that was closed as a preventive measure against the coronavirus (Reuters)
Palestinian police officers in Bethlehem in the West Bank stand guard outside the Church of the Nativity that was closed as a preventive measure against the coronavirus (Reuters)

A senior Fatah official was shot dead in the West Bank on Saturday during a confrontation with Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces, which raised concerns about security in the area.

Fatah member, Emadeddine Abu al-Ameed Dweikat, 54, was fatally shot in al-Balata suburb of Nablus, by security officers when they were trying to close stores and arrest their owners for not adhering to precautionary measures during the coronavirus pandemic.

Clashes erupted and authorities tried to arrest a store owner, when Dweikat intervened saying he allowed the shops to open for two hours per day within his capacity as Fatah’s official in the neighborhood. Then, a security officer opened fire, killing Dweikat and injuring another young man.

The incident soon turned into angry protests within Fatah areas, and protesters threw stones at the security forces and blocked roads in a tense situation.

The incident brought back to mind similar confrontations in Dheisha camp in Bethlehem between angry citizens and the security forces.

Also, the West Bank witnessed clashes between security forces and protesters denouncing the economic policies pursued within the emergency plan announced during the coronavirus pandemic.

The authority was accused of suppressing freedoms, arresting activists, and pursuing others, as rights groups and centers have denounced the use of excessive force.

The Popular Front, a major faction in the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), called on the PA security forces to enforce discipline among its members and “respect the law, dignity, and rights of our people.”

It urged authorities to establish more feasible measures to confront COVID-19 disease, noting that the current measures were not fair for the poor.

Meanwhile, Hemaya Center for Human Rights also condemned the use of excessive force by the authority, which constitutes a violation of the United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, stating in its third article that: “Law enforcement officials may use force only when strictly necessary and to the extent required for the performance of their duty.”

The Center called for an immediate, independent, and serious investigation into the killing of Dweikat, noting that the results must be publicly published in order to achieve justice.

The Governor of Nablus, Major General Ibrahim Ramadan, announced the formation of an investigative committee to probe Dweikat’s death.

“There is a necessity for everyone to exercise a sense of responsibility, and we will stand upon our own responsibilities to immediately investigate these events, based on instructions from the His Excellency the President and the Prime Minister,” Ramadan said in a press statement.



Morocco Denounces as 'Biased' ECJ Ruling Annulling its Trade Deals with EU

A bulldozer passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat located in the Western Sahara, Nov. 23, 2020. (AFP)
A bulldozer passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat located in the Western Sahara, Nov. 23, 2020. (AFP)
TT

Morocco Denounces as 'Biased' ECJ Ruling Annulling its Trade Deals with EU

A bulldozer passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat located in the Western Sahara, Nov. 23, 2020. (AFP)
A bulldozer passes by a hilltop manned by Moroccan soldiers on a road between Morocco and Mauritania in Guerguerat located in the Western Sahara, Nov. 23, 2020. (AFP)

Morocco's foreign ministry said a ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on Friday annulling its trade deals with the EU showed "blatant political bias".

The court said the European Commission had breached the right of people in Western Sahara to self-determination by concluding trade deals with Morocco.

The ruling contained legal errors and "suspicious factual mistakes", the ministry said in a statement, urging the European Council, the commission and member states to uphold their commitments and preserve the assets of the partnership with Morocco.

Western Sahara, a tract of desert the size of Britain, has been the scene of Africa's longest-running territorial dispute since colonial power Spain left in 1975 and Morocco annexed the territory.

Earlier on Friday, the European Union’s top court ruled definitively that fisheries and agriculture agreements reached between the bloc and Morocco five years ago failed to include consultations with the people of Western Sahara.

In its ruling, the European Court of Justice said that for the 2019 EU-Morocco farm and fisheries agreements to enter force, they “must receive the consent of the people of Western Sahara. However, such consent has not been given in this instance.”

It said the deals “were concluded in breach of the principles of self-determination and the relative effect of treaties.” The Luxembourg-based court dismissed “in their entirety” legal appeals by the EU’s executive branch and the council representing the 27 member countries.

The fisheries agreement laid out where European vessels with Moroccan permits could fish and included Moroccan-controlled waters west of the disputed territory. The four-year accord has already expired, so the court’s decision will only influence future agreements.

The court acknowledged that the EU institutions had launched a consultation process before concluding the agreements, but said this involved people who were present in the territory, “irrespective of whether or not they belong to the people of Western Sahara.”

It noted that “a significant proportion of that people now lives outside that territory.”