Macron Adopts Carrot and Stick Approach with Lebanese Political Elite

French President Emmanuel Macron listens to members of local NGOs unloading emergency aid delivered for Lebanon at Beirut port, Sept. 1, 2020. (AFP)
French President Emmanuel Macron listens to members of local NGOs unloading emergency aid delivered for Lebanon at Beirut port, Sept. 1, 2020. (AFP)
TT

Macron Adopts Carrot and Stick Approach with Lebanese Political Elite

French President Emmanuel Macron listens to members of local NGOs unloading emergency aid delivered for Lebanon at Beirut port, Sept. 1, 2020. (AFP)
French President Emmanuel Macron listens to members of local NGOs unloading emergency aid delivered for Lebanon at Beirut port, Sept. 1, 2020. (AFP)

French President Emmanuel Macron is adopting the carrot and stick approach in his talks with the Lebanese political elite. He reiterated that any support to Lebanon to overcome its financial and economic crisis should be closely linked to the implementation of actual reforms.

The French president warned that leaving Lebanon alone and refraining from helping it “means going into civil war.” He is aware that he is putting his credibility and that of his country at stake if he fails to push Lebanese officials to cooperate.

On his second trip to Beirut, he told the US newspaper Politico that he was making a “risky bet”.

“It’s a risky bet I’m making, I am aware of it … I am putting the only thing I have on the table: my political capital,” he told the daily.

But Macron has sought to collect all the necessary papers that he can use successively, within the framework of enticement and intimidation, while stressing on every occasion that he did “not interfere in Lebanese affairs”, and that he only wanted to help Lebanon by giving the current authorities “the last chance” to save the country.

Macron was the only head of state to rush to Beirut less than 48 hours after the Aug. 4 port explosion. A series of visits and aid shipments followed after him. The French president did not arrive empty-handed as aid poured in, and a team of 750 people, including about 500 soldiers, arrived in Lebanon with their heavy equipment to start removing the rubble, and another team to extend a helping hand in the investigation of the recent disaster.

He then organized an international meeting that resulted in commitments of 250 million euros of aid. Given the complexities of the Lebanese file, Macron engaged the French diplomacy in a broad campaign to pave the political path and provide the conditions in order to fill the institutional vacuum and bring in a new government.

For this purpose, he expanded his network of contacts at the regional and international levels seeking to obtain something like a “mandate.”

Moreover, Paris worked on elaborating reform proposals it deems necessary to persuade the Lebanon Support Group and the international financial institutions to stand by the stricken country.

During his meeting with representatives of civil society groups and the United Nations representatives working at the port on Tuesday, Macron said that Paris was ready to call for a new international conference towards mid or end of October under the auspices of the United Nations to “mobilize the international community” to provide support to Lebanon.

In return, based on the French president’s statements in Beirut and sources in the Elysée Palace, Paris wants the establishment of a “mission government”, which would adopt a reform program, obtain the Parliament’s confidence and work to implement the required reforms.

Macron also wants credible commitments by political party leaders that this time they would commit to the recovery plan with a specific timetable and follow-up mechanism to make sure the pledges are implemented.

He reiterated in Beirut that he would not go back on his demands, but without directly interfering in Lebanese internal affairs.

On Monday, Le Figaro newspaper reported that Macron hinted at sanctions on his return flight following his first official visit to Beirut.

“Yes - we are thinking about sanctions, but we have to do them with the Americans in order for them to be effective,” Macron was quoted by the newspaper as saying.

Sources cited by the newspaper said that the French president “began working on a plan to impose a system of sanctions that includes specific names”.

The sources added that the list would include personalities from all confessions, including Speaker Nabih Berri, former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, former Foreign Minister MP Gebran Bassil, the two daughters of President Michel Aoun and presidential advisor Salim Jreissati, in addition to Cedrus Bank, which was described as the bank of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) that was founded by Aoun.

Among the sanctions that can be imposed is preventing these figures and others from traveling to the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which includes 37 developed countries across the world, and to freeze their funds and assets.

Will things get this far? The answer depends on the developments in the next few weeks.



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.