Lebanese Judges Could be Summoned for Questioning over Port Blast

A man is evacuated at the site of the explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, Aug. 4, 2020. (Reuters/ Mohammed Azakir)
A man is evacuated at the site of the explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, Aug. 4, 2020. (Reuters/ Mohammed Azakir)
TT

Lebanese Judges Could be Summoned for Questioning over Port Blast

A man is evacuated at the site of the explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, Aug. 4, 2020. (Reuters/ Mohammed Azakir)
A man is evacuated at the site of the explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, Aug. 4, 2020. (Reuters/ Mohammed Azakir)

The judiciary’s investigation into the Aug. 4 Beirut Port explosion is going in a slow pace with the list of detainees limited to 25 persons, judicial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat.

But the sources said that ministers, politicians, security officials and judges could be soon summoned for questioning.

Investigative Judge Fadi Sawan heard the testimony of former Minister of Works and Transport Youssef Fenianos as a witness, then he interrogated two defendants in the case.

According to the sources, Fenianos “informed the judicial investigator that he had taken all the measures that fall within his powers, and that he presented all the documents he had on the case.”

Sawan will hear on Wednesday and Thursday the testimonies of security and military officials, including the Secretary-General of the Supreme Council for Defense, Major General Mahmoud Al-Asmar.

The judge will mainly inquire him on the withdrawal of the item pertaining to the presence of ammonium nitrate in the port from the agenda of the Council’s meeting a few days before the explosion.

Sources noted that the investigation “may include in the coming hours judges who received letters about the presence of ammonium nitrate in the port.”

Sawan aims to know the reasons that prevented them from "making a decisive decision to transfer the chemical to a safe place or to ship it abroad.”

Public Prosecutor Judge Ghassan Oweidat ordered the conclusion of the preliminary investigations conducted by the Lebanese army into the fire that broke out at the Beirut Port on Thursday. He also received the minutes of the interrogation of the three arrested workers, who had carried out the welding work at the site.

He referred the case to the Public Prosecution in Beirut, which would accuse the defendants of negligence after the outbreak of the fire and the destruction of public and private property.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Oweidat said: “There’s no indication that the fire was premeditated; rather it was the result of error and negligence in the maintenance work.”



Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
TT

Netanyahu ‘Takes Revenge’ on Macron in Lebanon

 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)
 A photo of Netanyahu and Macron during their meeting in Jerusalem in October 2023 (AFP)

Israel’s insistence that France can not be a member of the international committee that will monitor a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon is due to a series of French practices that have disturbed Israel recently, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed.
These practices are most notably attributed to the French judge at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, who has joined other judges to unanimously issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, the sources revealed.
“The Israeli government is following with concern the French role at The Hague,” they said, noting that veteran French lawyer Gilles Devers led a team of 300 international lawyers of various nationalities who volunteered to accuse Israel of “committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
According to the Israeli Maariv newspaper, Israeli officials believe that Devers, who signed the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Galant, would not have dared to do so without having received a green light from French President Emmanuel Macron.
Israeli sources also mentioned other reasons for Israel’s anger at France, such as the government’s decision to bar Israeli firms from exhibiting at the Euronaval arms show near Paris earlier this month.
French officials have repeatedly said that Paris is committed to Israel's security and point out that its military helped defend Israel after Iranian attacks in April and earlier this month.
Paris has so far also refused to recognize the Palestinian state. But the Israeli government is not satisfied. It wants France to follow the United States and blindly support its war in Gaza and Lebanon.
Tel Aviv also feels incredibly confident that France should be punished, and therefore, decided that Paris could not participate in the Lebanese ceasefire agreement, knowing that the Israeli government itself has traveled to Paris several times begging for its intervention, especially during the war on Lebanon.
Meanwhile, an air of optimism has emerged in Israel around the chances for an end to the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon following negotiations led by US envoy Amos Hochstein.
But any optimism relies on Netanyahu’s final decision. The PM is still conducting talks with his friends and allies of the far right who reject the ceasefire agreement and instead, demand that Lebanese citizens not be allowed to return to their villages on the border with Israel. They also request that a security belt be turned into a permanently depopulated and mined zone.
Hochstein Talks
Meanwhile, political sources in Israel claim that what is holding up a ceasefire deal so far is Lebanon. According to Israel's Channel 12, Hochstein expressed a “firm stance” during his talks with the Lebanese side. The envoy delivered clear terms that were passed on to Hezbollah, which the channel said “led to significant progress” in the talks.
Israeli officials said that Tel Aviv is moving towards a ceasefire agreement in Lebanon with Hezbollah in the coming days.
The channel said that during his late visit to Tel Aviv, coming from Beirut after talks with Speaker Nabih Barri, Hochstein said, “I placed before them (Lebanese officials) a final warning, and it seems to have been effective.”
Iran Obstacle
Despite the “positive atmosphere,” informed diplomatic sources pointed to a major obstacle: Iran.
Channel 12 quoted the sources as saying that Lebanon has not yet received the final approval required from Iran, which has significant influence over Hezbollah.

According to the draft proposal, the Lebanese Army must be redeployed to the south and carry out a comprehensive operation to remove weapons from villages. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will “supervise and monitor the implementation of the operation.”
Channel 12 said Israel believes that such details could still derail the agreement. It also said that Hezbollah could violate the truce.
“In such cases, Israel would have to conduct military operations inside the Lebanese territory,” the channel reported, adding that “one of the unsettled issues is related to the committee that will oversee the implementation of the agreement between Israel and Lebanon.”
The sources said Tel Aviv “insists that France is not part of the agreement, nor part of the committee that will oversee its implementation.”