Syria War Losses Exceed $442 Billion

Photo by Andrew Quilty
Photo by Andrew Quilty
TT
20

Syria War Losses Exceed $442 Billion

Photo by Andrew Quilty
Photo by Andrew Quilty

By the end of the eighth year of conflict in Syria, economic losses had exceeded an estimated $442 billion, according to a report issued by the National Agenda for the Future of Syria (NAFS) program of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and the Center for Syrian Studies at the University of St Andrews.

However huge, this number alone does not epitomize the suffering of a population among which 5.6 million people were registered as refugees and 6.4 million as internally displaced; 6.5 million were experiencing food insecurity, and 11.7 million were still in need of at least one form of humanitarian assistance.

The report, entitled “Syria at War: Eight Years on”, reveals that nearly 3 million children inside the country were out of school during the 2017-2018 academic year. The conflict has torn the social fabric and caused losses in human development, downgrading Syria’s status from medium human development to low human development.

In their foreword, ESWA and the University of St Andrews point out that “the consequences of the conflict for the economy and social fabric pose daunting future challenges: whether it is production, investment or human development, the conflict has cost the country its hard-won socioeconomic gains”.

The report shows that 82% of conflict-induced damage was accumulated in seven of the most capital-intensive sectors, namely housing, mining, security, transport, manufacturing, electricity, and health. It estimates the value of physical capital destruction at $117.7 billion and the loss in gross domestic product (GDP) at $324.5 billion, thus placing the macroeconomic cost of conflict at about $442.2 billion. The report also cites official data according to which, by the end of 2018, real GDP had lost 54% of its 2010 level.

As for trade, the report underlines that Syrian exports witnessed a collapse, from $8.7 billion in 2010 to $0.7 billion in 2018, resulting from disrupted production and trade chains. Infrastructure damage, the restrictive unilateral economic sanctions imposed by the United States of America and the European Union, and physical, financial, and human capital flight out of the country are among the contributing factors to this collapse. Imports, however, did not witness a comparable fall, which has widened the trade deficit and generated increasing pressure on the value of the Syrian pound (SYP).

The report also provides an overview of the repercussions of the conflict on governance and the rule of law, and of the different manifestations of its internationalization. It outlines some principles of peacebuilding, highlights challenges for recovery then suggests ways out of the deadlock.



Hezbollah Mulls Handing Its Heavy Weapons to Lebanese Army

A UNIFIL patrol in the border town of Kfar Kila in southern Lebanon, April 6 (AFP) 
A UNIFIL patrol in the border town of Kfar Kila in southern Lebanon, April 6 (AFP) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Mulls Handing Its Heavy Weapons to Lebanese Army

A UNIFIL patrol in the border town of Kfar Kila in southern Lebanon, April 6 (AFP) 
A UNIFIL patrol in the border town of Kfar Kila in southern Lebanon, April 6 (AFP) 

Lebanon has linked any move toward resolving the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons to Israel’s withdrawal from territories it still occupies in southern Lebanon and the return of Lebanese prisoners.

This position comes amid increasing diplomatic activity from Lebanese officials following a recent visit to Beirut by Morgan Ortagus, Deputy US Special Envoy to the Middle East, who urged Lebanese authorities to address the Hezbollah arms file swiftly.

A Lebanese ministerial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the current priority is “Israel’s withdrawal from the points it still occupies in the south, the return of Lebanese prisoners, and resolving the 13 disputed land border points”—a file unresolved since 2006.

The source added: “If progress is made on this front—Israeli withdrawal and prisoner return—parallel discussions with Hezbollah about disarmament could begin,” though no specific mechanism for disarmament was outlined. “There must be a conducive atmosphere for dialogue, which cannot happen without Israeli withdrawal. That’s Lebanon’s priority,” the source said.

Israeli Withdrawal as a Condition

Hezbollah’s position aligns with that of the Lebanese state. Reuters quoted a senior Hezbollah official saying the group is willing to discuss the issue of its arms within the framework of a national defense strategy, but only after Israel withdraws from five locations in southern Lebanon and ceases its aggression against Lebanese civilians.

In parallel, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam is expected to call for a cabinet session where Defense Minister Michel Mnassah will present a plan to assert full state sovereignty over Lebanese territory.

Hezbollah: Defense Regardless of the Mechanism

Hezbollah, in public statements, emphasizes “defending Lebanon from Israeli aggression regardless of the mechanism.” Hezbollah MP Ali Al-Moqdad told Asharq Al-Awsat: “We aim to protect Lebanon and defend it, and this is a national consensus,” stressing the need for collective cooperation in formulating a protective strategy.

Disarmament Mechanisms Under Discussion

Potential mechanisms for disarming Hezbollah include direct negotiations between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and the party, or broader discussions of a national defense strategy. Most Lebanese political circles favor dialogue and mutual understanding, firmly ruling out the use of military force.

Army Commander General Rodolphe Haikal reportedly conveyed to Ortagus his refusal to disarm Hezbollah by force, citing the risk of a military confrontation. Ortagus, however, reportedly urged “gradual but practical steps” to disarm the group, emphasizing that the Lebanese Army must “accelerate and intensify operations” toward this goal.

US Pressure to Move Forward

Ortagus told Lebanese officials that resolving the arms issue is urgent and emphasized that weapons should be in the hands of the state alone. In a statement to local channel LBCI, she reiterated Washington’s position, saying that it is clear “Hezbollah must be disarmed, and it’s clear Israel won’t accept rockets being launched at its territory. That’s a position we understand.”

Possible Transfer of Heavy Weapons

According to Reuters, sources close to Hezbollah said the group is considering transferring its heavy weapons—including drones and anti-tank missiles—north of the Litani River to the Lebanese Army. These sources noted that Aoun believes the issue must be resolved through dialogue, warning that any attempt to forcibly disarm Hezbollah could lead to conflict.