Trump Vowed to Remove Sudan from Terrorism List, Envoy Tells Asharq Al-Awsat

US President Donald Trump receives Sudan’s Ambassador to Washington Noureddine Sati. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US President Donald Trump receives Sudan’s Ambassador to Washington Noureddine Sati. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Trump Vowed to Remove Sudan from Terrorism List, Envoy Tells Asharq Al-Awsat

US President Donald Trump receives Sudan’s Ambassador to Washington Noureddine Sati. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
US President Donald Trump receives Sudan’s Ambassador to Washington Noureddine Sati. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Noureddine Sati, Sudan’s ambassador to the United States, said he expected that an executive order would be issued by President Donald Trump to remove Sudan from the list of countries sponsoring terrorism.

“I asked Trump about removing Sudan from the list of terrorism, and I told him that we expect good relations to be established. The president replied that his administration would use all means to remove Sudan from the list of terrorism,” Sati told Asharq Al-Awsat in an interview on Monday.

According to Sati, the issuance of an executive order by Trump to remove Sudan from the list of states sponsoring terrorism should face no obstacles. This issue is not likely to face rejection in the Congress, he noted.

The ambassador, who became the representative of his country in Washington, after a diplomatic rift of 23 years, indicated that the events of Nairobi, Dar al-Salaam and other terrorist incidents, of which Sudan is accused “are almost settled, as the Sudanese government has indebted sums of money to compensate the families of the victims.”

“However, the current dilemma lies in the US Congress’ insistence on involving Sudan in the September 11 attacks,” he underlined.

The ambassador continued: “There are contradictory legal details, and the disagreement of the two major parties in the US over Sudan is the major problem. This is the difficulty we are facing now, but the embassy’s legal team is following carefully on the details of the matter.”

Sati stressed that his country has made considerable progress in human rights issues, combating extremism and terrorism, religious freedoms, as well as achieving peace at home and abroad.

Regarding the normalization of relations between Sudan and Israel, Sati said that economic and financial assistance to the country, along with its removal from the list of countries sponsoring terrorism, were all reasons to consider the establishment of ties.

However, he emphasized that the economic, psychological, social, political and historical situation in the country “is not ready” for such a move.

“We cannot engage in normalization with Israel while the people are suffering from all these difficulties; but if they provide us with economic assistance, the issue of normalization will be considered,” he stated.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.