Amr Moussa: Commentary, Clarification, Confirmation

Amr Moussa: Commentary, Clarification, Confirmation
TT

Amr Moussa: Commentary, Clarification, Confirmation

Amr Moussa: Commentary, Clarification, Confirmation

When I decided to publish my memoirs, from which two books have been written, I committed myself to three obligations that I deemed politically and morally necessary.

In a world filled with conflicting stories and contrasting narratives, these commitments were important for my memoirs to move away from problems that have been known to face similar works by leaders, politicians, intellectuals, and cultural figures.

The first of these commitments was related to the need for any narration of political facts to be backed by official sources and conclusive evidence. The second was ensuring a clear separation between personal impressions and analysis on the one hand and verified facts on the other. The third and final commitment was for my notes to be loyal to truth-telling and national interest.

Fulfilling those obligations drove me to entail the assistance of a professional journalist, Khaled Abu Bakr, not only to edit material, but also to strive to document facts from original sources as appropriate.

With the esteemed Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper releasing successive excerpts from my memoir’s second book, which was recently published by Dar El-Shorouk under the title “The Years of the Arab League,” I read a comment written by the former Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri Al-Hadithi and posted on the newspaper's website on December 13.

I deemed it necessary to respond to his comment, clarify matters, and confirm the accuracy of the facts published in the book.

To begin with, the facts that Al-Hadithi targeted in his commentary on my meeting with the late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in Baghdad on March 19, 2002, were not extracted from memory. They were recorded in the minutes of the official meeting.

Abu Bakr had obtained a copy of the minutes from the late Ambassador Ahmed ben Helli, who had served as deputy secretary-general of the Arab League in 2016.

Since the official report used abstract technical language in describing what happened during the visit and the atmosphere that engulfed the meeting, Abu Bakr also procured an audio recording from Helli.

The recording covers the atmosphere of the meeting, the tone in which I spoke with the then Iraqi president and some other details that were not mentioned in the minutes of the session. It is important to me that Asharq Al-Awsat publishes this recording.

Together, the minutes of the meeting and the recorded audio testimony of Helli, which he made about five years after I left the helm of the Arab League, confirm the validity of all the facts mentioned in the book regarding the meeting and subsequent developments in the Iraq crisis. They leave no room for doubt about the accuracy and coherence of the memoir.

Amr Moussa is the former Secretary-General of the Arab League and former Egyptian Foreign Minister



UK's Landmark Postwar Elections: When Labor Ended 13 Years of Conservative Rule in 1964

FILE - The War Cabinet at No. 10 Downing Street in London, Oct. 15, 1941. Seated from left, Sir John Anderson, Lord President of the council; Prime Minister Winston Churchill; C.R. Attlee, Lord Privy Seal; Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, standing from left, Arthur Greenwood, Minister without portfolio; Ernest Bevin, Minister of Labour; Lord Beaverbrook, Minister of Aircraft Production, and Sir Kingsley Wood, Chancellor of the Exchequer. (AP Photo/File)
FILE - The War Cabinet at No. 10 Downing Street in London, Oct. 15, 1941. Seated from left, Sir John Anderson, Lord President of the council; Prime Minister Winston Churchill; C.R. Attlee, Lord Privy Seal; Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, standing from left, Arthur Greenwood, Minister without portfolio; Ernest Bevin, Minister of Labour; Lord Beaverbrook, Minister of Aircraft Production, and Sir Kingsley Wood, Chancellor of the Exchequer. (AP Photo/File)
TT

UK's Landmark Postwar Elections: When Labor Ended 13 Years of Conservative Rule in 1964

FILE - The War Cabinet at No. 10 Downing Street in London, Oct. 15, 1941. Seated from left, Sir John Anderson, Lord President of the council; Prime Minister Winston Churchill; C.R. Attlee, Lord Privy Seal; Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, standing from left, Arthur Greenwood, Minister without portfolio; Ernest Bevin, Minister of Labour; Lord Beaverbrook, Minister of Aircraft Production, and Sir Kingsley Wood, Chancellor of the Exchequer. (AP Photo/File)
FILE - The War Cabinet at No. 10 Downing Street in London, Oct. 15, 1941. Seated from left, Sir John Anderson, Lord President of the council; Prime Minister Winston Churchill; C.R. Attlee, Lord Privy Seal; Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, standing from left, Arthur Greenwood, Minister without portfolio; Ernest Bevin, Minister of Labour; Lord Beaverbrook, Minister of Aircraft Production, and Sir Kingsley Wood, Chancellor of the Exchequer. (AP Photo/File)

Britain’s upcoming general election is widely expected to lead to a change of government for the first time in 14 years. Many analysts believe it will be one of the country’s most consequential elections since the end of World War II.
Ahead of the July 4 vote, The Associated Press takes a look back at other landmark UK elections since the war.
In 1964, the Conservative Party had been in power for 13 years and was on its fourth prime minister, Alec Douglas-Home.
That has echoes of the current Conservative government, which has been in power for 14 years and is now on its fifth prime minister of the period, Rishi Sunak.
Douglas-Home had only become prime minister the year before, when his predecessor Harold Macmillan stepped down following a huge reversal in fortune. The buoyant economy had faltered, and Macmillan had been snubbed by French President Charles de Gaulle in his application for Britain to join the recently formed European Economic Community.
A sex scandal rocked his government and the British establishment, adding to the general feeling that the Conservatives had lost touch. Macmillan, known as “Supermac,” stepped down soon after his minister for war, John Profumo, resigned for lying to Parliament over his affair with model and showgirl Christine Keeler.
So the 1964 election was a race between the aristocratic Douglas-Home and Labor leader Harold Wilson, who was buzzing with ideas such as harnessing the “white heat of technology” to modernize the ailing British economy.
Wilson also had the common touch, particularly important in the new world of television and with Britain showing signs of a cultural renaissance in the “Swinging Sixties.” Wilson was more than able to hold his own with The Beatles, as evidenced in March 1964 when he presented the Fab Four an award.
When the election came about on Oct. 15, 1964, Labor was widely expected to return to power for the first time since 1951. “13 Wasted Years" was its message. But the party didn't do as well as many had expected, and Labour only won a majority of four in the House of Commons.
Wilson, who at 48 became the youngest British prime minister in 70 years, would need a bigger majority to get major legislation through — and he got it 18 months later when he called a snap election.
Wilson lost the election in 1970 to Ted Heath's Conservatives, but would go on to serve a second term as prime minister from 1974 to 1976, becoming the longest-serving Labor premier in the 20th century. By that second period in office, Wilson was clearly exhausted and lacking the dynamism of his early years.
Britain was widely considered to be the “sick man of Europe” and it was fertile ground for radical change. Step forward, Margaret Thatcher.