Biden’s Middle East Policy Tied to Fate of Tehran Negotiations

US President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters following an online meeting with members of the National Governors Association (NGA) executive committee in Wilmington, Delaware, US, November 19, 2020. REUTERS/Tom Brenner
US President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters following an online meeting with members of the National Governors Association (NGA) executive committee in Wilmington, Delaware, US, November 19, 2020. REUTERS/Tom Brenner
TT

Biden’s Middle East Policy Tied to Fate of Tehran Negotiations

US President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters following an online meeting with members of the National Governors Association (NGA) executive committee in Wilmington, Delaware, US, November 19, 2020. REUTERS/Tom Brenner
US President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters following an online meeting with members of the National Governors Association (NGA) executive committee in Wilmington, Delaware, US, November 19, 2020. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

US President-elect Joe Biden’s policy towards the Middle East region will not crystallize in the first months of his term, as observers agree that his current priorities are now directed at the US interior.

However, Biden will gradually begin to tackle the region’s outstanding files, mainly the relations with Tehran, especially as he had announced that he would return to the nuclear agreement and lift the sanctions on Iran if it “strictly” adhered to the international deal.

Former diplomats, who have worked in Washington with successive US administrations, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the fate of negotiations with Tehran would largely determine the course of the region’s files.

In this regard, former Lebanese ambassador to Washington, Riad Tabbara, noted that Biden’s statements during his election campaign, “all confirm that, unlike his predecessor, he will adopt a policy of openness to the Middle East region and to all of Washington’s old allies, whether in Europe or elsewhere.”

The nuclear agreement with Tehran is likely to be expanded to meet America’s ambitions, Tabbara said, adding that several provisions would be reviewed, including the annulment of the 10-year deadline, during which Iran could not produce a nuclear bomb, to be replaced by a permanent agreement without a time limit.

The second provision, according to Tabbara, will see the inclusion of the ballistic missile program and other matters that were not covered by the agreement during the era of former US President Barack Obama. As for the third item, it will pertain to organizing Iran’s relationship with neighboring countries and with pro-Tehran militias, mainly the Houthis, the Popular Mobilization Forces, and Hezbollah.

For his part, former Lebanese ambassador to the US Abdallah Bouhabib stressed that Biden would focus on the internal situation in the US, “where conditions are not good at all levels, whether in terms of the coronavirus pandemic, the economic situation or civil peace.”

“Since Biden was the vice president of Barack Obama, and a large part of his current team was among Obama’s team, there is no doubt that his policy towards the Middle East will be influenced to some extent by Obama’s policy,” Bouhabib underlined.

Former Lebanese Ambassador to Washington Antoine Shedid agreed with Bouhabib, but stressed that the reality on the ground has changed in recent years.

“The region as a whole has changed, whether in the series of normalization agreements between Arab countries and Israel or with regard to Iran’s continuous interference in the region’s affairs,” Shedid said, adding: “All these are files that Biden will have to take into account while formulating his policies for the region.”

The British Times had ruled out that Biden would reverse the policies implemented by President Donald Trump on many of the main files in the Middle East, especially Palestine, Iran, and Syria. It said that Biden was likely to adhere to Trump’s policies, continue to increasingly neglect the region, and focus on other challenges.



Tehran Ready for Negotiations with Washington ‘Based on Trust’

Iranian government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani. (Jamaran news)
Iranian government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani. (Jamaran news)
TT

Tehran Ready for Negotiations with Washington ‘Based on Trust’

Iranian government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani. (Jamaran news)
Iranian government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani. (Jamaran news)

The Iranian government stated on Tuesday that upcoming negotiations in Geneva over its nuclear program will be guided by the directives of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the interests of the Iranian people.

Iran plans to hold talks on Friday in Geneva with France, Britain and Germany, following a recent resolution by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censuring Tehran for its lack of cooperation on its nuclear activities.

Government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani confirmed that the meeting between Iran’s deputy foreign minister and representatives from the three European nations will proceed under the framework of “national interests as emphasized by the Supreme Leader.” She noted that discussions will encompass bilateral, regional and international issues, including the crises in Gaza and Lebanon and broader efforts to promote peace in the region.

Asked about the possibility of direct negotiations with the United States, Mohajerani stated that Tehran is “open to considering any proposal aligned with its national interests.” However, she stressed that “dialogue requires respect and trust, which cannot be built through mere rhetoric.”

Majid Takht-Ravanchi, Deputy Foreign Minister for International Affairs, will lead the Iranian delegation at the Geneva talks, according to Iranian media.

Media outlets close to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) expressed cautious optimism about the Geneva talks, but tempered expectations. The IRGC-affiliated Nour News described the meeting as a “small but significant opportunity for both sides to find common ground and reduce unnecessary tensions that have strained their relations in recent years.”

Both Iran and its European counterparts appear inclined to pursue de-escalation and resume diplomatic channels to resolve disputes, it reported. Analysts quoted by the site characterized the talks as “an essential step in rebuilding trust between Iran and Europe.” If sustained, these efforts could end the two-year stalemate in negotiations over the nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The IAEA’s Board of Governors recently passed a resolution urging Iran to increase its cooperation with the agency. The resolution called for the IAEA Director General to deliver “a comprehensive and updated assessment on the possible presence or use of undeclared nuclear materials in connection with Iran’s past and current nuclear activities.”

Western powers, including the United States, France, Britain and Germany, dismissed Iran’s last-minute proposal to limit its stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium—close to weapons-grade—as “inadequate and insincere.”

In response, Iran announced the activation of advanced centrifuges at its Fordow and Natanz uranium enrichment facilities.

Despite the heightened tensions, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei underscored Tehran’s commitment to a policy of engagement and cooperation. He framed the upcoming talks as a continuation of discussions held on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Iranian media claimed that Tehran has refrained from actions that could complicate negotiations in recent months. However, they accused European powers of taking “unconstructive measures” that have hindered the diplomatic process.