Youri Djorkaeff: ‘I Was in Love with England, Its Fans and Weather’

Youri Djorkaeff in action for Bolton in 2004. Photograph: Matthew Lewis/Getty Images
Youri Djorkaeff in action for Bolton in 2004. Photograph: Matthew Lewis/Getty Images
TT

Youri Djorkaeff: ‘I Was in Love with England, Its Fans and Weather’

Youri Djorkaeff in action for Bolton in 2004. Photograph: Matthew Lewis/Getty Images
Youri Djorkaeff in action for Bolton in 2004. Photograph: Matthew Lewis/Getty Images

Youri Djorkaeff played alongside some of the greatest footballers of his generation. “Zizou was amazing,” he says of Zinedine Zidane.

“We were teammates for 10 years and we had this chemistry to know exactly where each other was on the pitch, to play one touch, two touch. But the number one was Ronaldo. He was simply ‘Ó Fenómeno’.”

Djorkaeff played with Ronaldo at Inter in the mid-1990s and the pair teamed up recently as part of Djorkaeff’s current job as the CEO of the Fifa Foundation. Djorkaeff was in São Paulo and Brasilia to push the charity, so enlisted his old friend for support. “Ronnie said: ‘Whenever I’m needed, you can call me.’ Of course, this provides us with visibility as Ronaldo is Ronaldo.”

Ronaldo is one of a multitude of good connections the 52-year-old can call upon. “I have been in touch with David Beckham, who is keen to get involved. I went to Messi’s house, where we spoke for hours about links with his foundation. We spoke to Rashford. We are proud of what the players are doing today. It’s important to have all these ambassadors for the Fifa Foundation who appreciate the need to show humanity. They are all saying: ‘If you need me, I’m here to help.’ It’s not bullshit.”

Djorkaeff was an integral part of the France team that won the World Cup in 1998. His interest in Fifa’s charitable work was sparked at another World Cup in France 21 years later. “I met president Gianni Infantino at the Women’s World Cup in Paris and we started to talk about the work of the foundation. We had a couple of follow-up meetings and I really liked what he said about his vision for the foundation and how it could be a tool for good. Previously, there had been a lot of requests about sustainable responsibility but these were not high on the agenda. But it is now crucially important for clubs, federations and Fifa themselves to be active in supporting social responsibility.”

Over the last year Djorkaeff has built up a team of a dozen people.

“We have been working on a 10-year strategic plan and we are aligning ourselves with organisations such as the UN. Our aim is to reach 700 million children.” It sounds like an extremely ambitious target, but Djorkaeff is adamant it can be achieved. “Throughout my life, whether it has been playing football or in my current position, my philosophy has always been that nothing is impossible.”

As soon as Djorkaeff retired from playing, he set up the Youri Djorkaeff Foundation in New York with the objective of giving both boys and girls – particularly refugees – a chance to build a solid foundation for their lives: to improve their health, discipline, self-confidence, academic success and aspirations for the future. He gave up his own foundation when he took on his full-time role at Fifa’s headquarters in Zurich in September 2019. He was just beginning to travel the world for his new role, visiting 29 countries in the space of three months, when the Covid-19 pandemic struck.

“Through the power of football I gained incredible access to heads of state and ministers, where we could open up a dialogue about the work of the foundation. For example, I met the President of China, but also got to meet people on the ground. The most important aspect of this initiative is to listen to people – whether they are a head of state or a grassroots coach with only a few balls to practice – to find out what they need.”

Djorkaeff has been focusing on the Football for Schools Program, a joint venture between Fifa, Unesco and the World Food Program that aims to provide children in Fifa’s 211 member associations with 11 million footballs. “I met with Unesco in Paris and we reached an agreement very quickly as together we realised how important it is to create a link between teachers, kids and parents. So we are now creating a tool to help schools run coaching sessions,” says Djorkaeff.

“There will be an app that hosts 300 coaching sessions all at different levels. The most important thing is to have 50% of these sessions dedicated to life skills. As pupils are taking a break, they will be taught subjects such as gender equality, the importance of community and neighborhood. We expect to launch the app from February as a free program for governments and schools. We will also provide them with equipment – balls, shirts, bibs etc. This is not about becoming a professional, but it’s all about enjoying football with your friends, regardless of ability.”

Djorkaeff played for various clubs across the world – he won the French Cup with Monaco under Arsène Wenger, the Cup Winners’ Cup with PSG and the Uefa Cup with Inter before finishing is career at the New York Red Bulls – but he is perhaps best known in England for his time with Bolton. How on earth did he end up making his way from the Bundesliga to Bolton in 2002? “I had some difficulty with my coach at Kaiserslautern and I had dinner with Sam Allardyce in Germany and we talked about anything and everything. He told me about the situation at the club and how they were near relegation. I saw this tough guy and his passion for this club and their fans and it got to me.”

“I thought like a chevalier: let’s conquer England, let’s cross Le Manche. When I had been playing, my attitude to England was the same as all French people; it was hate-like-hate-like. But I was crazy about Liverpool and remember cheering them on when they were playing St Étienne in 1977 in the European Cup. All these guys with their crazy hair and those red shirts. I bought lots of Liverpool shirts and hats all the time – not wearing them, just collecting. I was fascinated by the clubs and the fans.

“I was talking to Liverpool, Manchester United and Bolton all at the same time. I spoke to Gérard Houllier, who was a great friend, but he said I cannot promise you to be playing all the time. We were approaching the 2002 World Cup and I spoke to Roger Lemerre, the French national coach, who told me I needed to be playing to be considered. It was the same with Sir Alex. So, I thought: ‘I’ll go to Bolton for the last 12 games.’ I didn’t know what to expect but I was in love with England, in love with its shitty weather, the people, the fans.”

Bolton were in the relegation places when Djorkaeff arrived in February 2002. At the time Allardyce called him “perhaps the biggest signing in the club’s history”. Djorkaeff did not disappoint. He helped steer the club to safety and decided to stay for two more seasons.

Allardyce loved him. When asked to pick a best XI from the best players he had managed a few years ago, he was quick to include the Frenchman. “Youri was top-class, a brilliant human being as well as a brilliant footballer,” said Allardyce. “His nickname was ‘The Snake’ because you never knew when he was going to strike – that came from Arsène Wenger by the way. He knew how to set the standards. He used to get very upset about the lads not training correctly, or not hitting the standards he was looking for, and he had a terrific three years with us at Bolton.”

Wenger gave Djorkaeff his nickname at Monaco three decades ago. Now they are working together again at Fifa. Wenger, Ronaldo, Messi, Beckham, Rashford and Allardyce will be cheering on Djorkaeff over the next decade as he tries to match his achievements on the pitch with those off it.

The Guardian Sport



Report: Trump Considers Targeted Strike Against Iran, Followed by Larger Attack 

Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff attend the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on February 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff attend the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on February 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Report: Trump Considers Targeted Strike Against Iran, Followed by Larger Attack 

Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff attend the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on February 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)
Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff attend the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on February 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Getty Images/AFP)

US President Donald Trump has told advisers that if diplomacy or any initial targeted US attack does not lead Iran to give in to his demands that it give up its nuclear program, he will consider a much bigger attack in coming months intended to drive that country’s leaders from power, people briefed on internal administration deliberations told the New York Times.

Negotiators from the United States and Iran are scheduled to meet in Geneva on Thursday for what appears to be last-ditch negotiations to avoid a military conflict. But Trump has been weighing options for US action if the negotiations fail.

Though no final decisions have been made, advisers said, Trump has been leaning toward conducting an initial strike in coming days intended to demonstrate to Iran’s leaders that they must be willing to agree to give up the ability to make a nuclear weapon.

Targets under consideration range from the headquarters of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps to the country’s nuclear sites to the ballistic missile program.

Should those steps fail to convince Tehran to meet his demands, Trump told advisers, he would leave open the possibility of a military assault later this year intended to help topple Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader.

In this handout photograph released by the US Navy, an F/A-18F Super Hornet, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 41, prepares to make an arrested landing on the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) in the Arabian Sea on February 15, 2026. (AFP photo / US Navy)

Doubts

There are doubts even inside the administration about whether that goal can be accomplished with airstrikes alone. And behind the scenes, a new proposal is being considered by both sides that could create an off-ramp to military conflict: a very limited nuclear enrichment program that Iran could carry out solely for purposes of medical research and treatments.

It is unclear whether either side would agree. But the last-minute proposal comes as two aircraft carrier groups and dozens of fighter jets, bombers and refueling aircraft are now massing within striking distance of Iran.

Trump discussed plans for strikes on Iran in the White House Situation Room on Wednesday. The meeting included Vice President JD Vance; Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the CIA director, John Ratcliffe; and Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff.

During the meeting, Trump pressed Caine and Ratcliffe to weigh in on the broader strategy in Iran, but neither official generally advocates a certain policy position. Caine discussed what the military could do from an operational standpoint, and Ratcliffe preferred to discuss the current situation on the ground and possible outcomes of proposed operations.

During the discussions of the operation last month to seize President Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela, Caine told Trump there was a high likelihood of success. But Caine has not been able to deliver the same reassurances to Trump during the Iran discussions, in large measure because it is a far more difficult target.

Vance, who has long called for more restraint in overseas military action, did not oppose a strike, but he intensely questioned Caine and Ratcliffe in the meeting. He pressed them to share their opinions of the options and wanted more of a discussion of the risks and complexity of carrying out a strike against Iran.

An Iranian soldier walks next to an anti-US mural in Tehran, Iran, 23 February 2026. (EPA)

Options against Iran

Earlier, the United States had been considering options that included putting teams of special operations forces on the ground that could carry out raids to destroy Iranian nuclear or missile facilities. That included manufacturing and enrichment operations buried far below the surface, outside the range of American conventional munitions.

But any such raid would be highly dangerous, requiring special operations forces to be on the ground far longer than they were for the raid to capture Maduro. Multiple US officials said that for now, the plans for a commando raid had been shelved.

Army, Navy and Air Force officials have also raised concerns about the impact that a protracted war with Iran, or just remaining poised for such a conflict, could have on the readiness of Navy ships, scarce Patriot antimissile defenses, and overstretched transport and surveillance planes.

The White House declined to comment on Trump’s decision making.

“The media may continue to speculate on the President’s thinking all they want, but only President Trump knows what he may or may not do,” Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement.

Pedestrians walk past a billboard depicting a US aircraft carrier with damaged fighter jets on its deck and a sign in Farsi and English reading, "If you sow the wind, you'll reap the whirlwind," at Enqelab-e-Eslami Square in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Feb. 22, 2026. (AP)

‘Zero enrichment’

Even before the Iranians submit what appears likely to be their last proposal — officials said they expected it to be transmitted to the Trump administration on Monday or Tuesday — the two sides appeared to be hardening their positions. Steve Witkoff, the president’s special envoy, said on Fox News that Trump’s “clear direction” to him and Jared Kushner, his co-negotiator and the president’s son-in-law, was that the only acceptable outcome for an agreement was that Iran would move to “zero enrichment” of nuclear material.

But Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, insisted anew in an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the country was not ready to give up what he said was its “right” to make nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

With that statement, the decision about whether the United States was about to attack targets in Iran — with the apparent goal of further weakening the government of Khamenei — seemed to come down to whether both sides could agree to a face-saving compromise about nuclear production that Washington and Tehran could each describe as a total victory.

One such proposal is being debated by both the Trump administration and the Iranian leadership. According to several officials, it emanated from Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a United Nations organization that inspects Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Under the proposal, Iran would be permitted to produce very small amounts of nuclear fuel for medical purposes. Iran has been producing medical isotopes for years at the Tehran Research Reactor, a nearly 60-year-old facility outside the country’s capital that was, in one of the strange twists of modern nuclear history, first supplied to the pro-American shah of Iran by the United States under the “Atoms for Peace” program.

If adapted, Iran could claim that it was still enriching uranium. Trump could make the case that Iran is shuttering all the facilities that would enable it to build a weapon — most of which were left open, operating at low levels, under the 2015 agreement between Iran and the Obama administration. Trump exited that agreement in 2018, leading the Iranians to eventually bar inspectors and produce near-bomb-grade uranium and setting the stage for the current crisis.

But it is far from clear whether the Iranians are willing to shrink what is now a vast, industrial-production nuclear program, on which they have spent billions of dollars, to a tiny effort of such limited scope.

And it is also unclear whether Trump would allow nuclear production limited to cancer treatment studies and other medical purposes, given his public “zero enrichment” declarations.

In this handout photograph released by the US Navy, an F/A-18F Super Hornet, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 41, prepares to make an arrested landing on the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) in the Arabian Sea on February 15, 2026. (AFP photo / US Navy)

‘Military buildup cannot help’

Araghchi made no direct mention of the proposal when he spoke from Tehran. But he said, “I believe that still there is a good chance to have a diplomatic solution,” adding, “So there is no need for any military buildup, and military buildup cannot help it and cannot pressurize us.”

In fact, pressure is the key to these negotiations. What Trump calls the “vast armada” that the United States has built up in the seas around Iran is the largest military force it has concentrated in the region since it prepared for the invasion of Iraq, nearly 23 years ago.

Two aircraft carrier groups, scores of fighter jets, bombers and refueling planes, and antimissile batteries have poured into the region, a demonstration of gunboat diplomacy even larger than the one that preceded the forced extraction of Maduro from Venezuela in early January.

The second carrier, the Gerald R. Ford, was steaming south of Italy in the Mediterranean Sea on Sunday, and will soon be off the coast of Israel, military officials said.

Further complicating any final decision on military strikes, Arab leaders have been calling counterparts in Washington to complain about comments from Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, the conservative commentator, that aired on Friday, Huckabee said Israel had a right to much of the Middle East, outraging Arab countries.

Administration officials have been unclear what their objectives are as they confront Iran, a country of more than 90 million people. While Trump often talks about preventing Iran from ever being able to produce a weapon, Rubio and other aides have described a range of other rationales for military action: protecting the protesters whom Iranian forces killed by the thousands last month, wiping out the arsenal of missiles that Iran can use to strike Israel, and ending Tehran’s support for Hamas and Hezbollah.

But American military action could also result in a nationalistic response, even among Iranians eager to see the end of Khamenei’s brutal hold on power.

European officials attending the Munich Security Conference last weekend said they doubted that the military pressure would force the Iranian leadership to give up a program that has become a symbol of resistance to the United States.


Israeli Team in Peace Council Reveals Vision for Gaza Reconstruction

A female member of the al-Ghafir family, sits of the debris of the al-Hasayna Mosque as she recites from a copy of the Quran, during the holy month of Ramadan in western Gaza City on February 21, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
A female member of the al-Ghafir family, sits of the debris of the al-Hasayna Mosque as she recites from a copy of the Quran, during the holy month of Ramadan in western Gaza City on February 21, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
TT

Israeli Team in Peace Council Reveals Vision for Gaza Reconstruction

A female member of the al-Ghafir family, sits of the debris of the al-Hasayna Mosque as she recites from a copy of the Quran, during the holy month of Ramadan in western Gaza City on February 21, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)
A female member of the al-Ghafir family, sits of the debris of the al-Hasayna Mosque as she recites from a copy of the Quran, during the holy month of Ramadan in western Gaza City on February 21, 2026. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP)

While many observers remain skeptical about the chances of success for President Donald Trump’s comprehensive Middle East peace plan, figures close to the US administration are projecting confidence. Among them are three Israelis selected for key roles in the project, though they do not formally represent the Israeli government.

According to a report in Yedioth Ahronoth, the officials insist the initiative is already underway, with Egypt, Türkiye and Qatar playing influential roles in persuading Hamas to cooperate. Despite skepticism within parts of Israel’s political and military leadership regarding the feasibility of the plan — and the ability of Trump advisers Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to implement it — the Peace Council members argue that progress so far is “encouraging.”

The Israeli members of the council are Israeli-Cypriot businessman Yakir Gabay, high-tech entrepreneur Liran Tancman, and Michael Eisenberg, who serves as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s representative at the US coordination headquarters in Kiryat Gat.

They contend that Hamas’ agreement to disarm, coupled with reforms to Palestinian school curricula to promote “a culture of peace and tolerance,” would transform Trump’s initiative into “a historic opportunity to turn Gaza into a true Riviera.”

Gabay outlined the first phase: removing 70 million tons of rubble and unexploded ordnance, recycling usable materials, demolishing and sealing hundreds of kilometers of tunnels, and establishing rapid temporary housing in reinforced tents. Parallel efforts would focus on building infrastructure and permanent residential towers.

Plans also include modern hospitals, schools, factories, agricultural zones, road and rail networks, energy and water facilities, data centers, a seaport and an airport. Contractors experienced in constructing millions of housing units across the Middle East would be recruited, with funding reportedly secured. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are expected to be created. In addition to housing and workplaces, 200 hotels are planned.

Tancman, who advises Israel’s national cyber directorate, pledged to introduce advanced technological solutions in cooperation with American, Arab and Palestinian partners. This includes upgrading Gaza’s internet network from 2G to 5G and making access free of charge. Mechanisms for exporting Gaza-made goods are also under development.

A “New Era”?

Officials told Yedioth Ahronoth that reconstruction has effectively begun in Rafah and is expected to take three years. Israel is currently clearing debris, with 100,000 homes slated for construction in the first phase to house 500,000 residents. Infrastructure alone is projected to cost $5 billion. Ultimately, 400,000 homes are planned, with total infrastructure costs estimated at $30 billion, alongside a similar sum for construction.

A senior Peace Council member suggested that if Hamas responds positively, Israel could consider measures such as amnesty for its leaders or even purchasing weapons for cash. “Gaza and its people could enter a new era—connected and open to the world,” he said.

Separately, The Times of Israel cited a US official confirming that funds would not flow before Hamas agrees to disarm, adding that Israel must also act constructively.

An Arab diplomat cautioned that sustained pressure on both sides would be essential to ensure the plan’s success and the establishment of a technocratic administration in Gaza.


South Korea Tells Nationals to Leave Iran

Iranians walk past a huge billboard carrying a poem interpretation in Persian 'Human will defeat the evils' at Valiasr Square in Tehran, Iran, 21 February 2026. EPA/ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH
Iranians walk past a huge billboard carrying a poem interpretation in Persian 'Human will defeat the evils' at Valiasr Square in Tehran, Iran, 21 February 2026. EPA/ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH
TT

South Korea Tells Nationals to Leave Iran

Iranians walk past a huge billboard carrying a poem interpretation in Persian 'Human will defeat the evils' at Valiasr Square in Tehran, Iran, 21 February 2026. EPA/ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH
Iranians walk past a huge billboard carrying a poem interpretation in Persian 'Human will defeat the evils' at Valiasr Square in Tehran, Iran, 21 February 2026. EPA/ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH

South Korea on Monday advised its nationals in Iran to leave when flights are available as tensions are growing over a possible US military strike on the country.

"We advise (Korean nationals) to leave Iran when available flights are in operation," the South Korean Embassy said in a safety notice published on its website.

It warned that if the situation rapidly worsens, private flights heading to and departing from Iran could be suspended.

South Korea has maintained the Level 3 travel advisory for Iran, which strongly advises South Koreans there to leave the country.

"We advise Korean nationals staying in Iran to swiftly leave it when there is no urgent business and those who are planning a trip (to the country) to cancel or postpone it," the notice read.

US President Donald Trump said last week he is considering limited military strikes on Iran, exerting pressure on Tehran to reach a new nuclear deal.

Iran has indicated it is prepared to make concessions on its nuclear program in talks with the US in return for the lifting of sanctions and recognition of its right to enrich uranium, as it seeks to avert a US attack.