عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News
Arab World

Arab FMs Renew Support to Two-State Solution, Ending Debate over ‘Deal of Century’

The Arab foreign ministers meet in Cairo on Monday. (SPA)
The Arab foreign ministers meet in Cairo on Monday. (SPA)
TT
TT

Arab FMs Renew Support to Two-State Solution, Ending Debate over ‘Deal of Century’

The Arab foreign ministers meet in Cairo on Monday. (SPA)
The Arab foreign ministers meet in Cairo on Monday. (SPA)

The Arab foreign ministers effectively put an end on Monday to the debate over the so-called “deal of the century” proposal to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, by reiterating their commitment to the two-state solution.

The two-state solution is the only way to end the conflict, they declared during an emergency meeting in Cairo.

Former US President Donald Trump had unveiled the “deal of the century” peace proposal in January 2020. It was vehemently rejected by the Palestinians because it was largely biased towards Israel and dashed their hopes for an independent state with east Jerusalem as its capital.

The ten foreign ministers who met in the Egyptian capital welcomed the international and regional efforts aimed at pushing forward peace efforts, underlining the important role played by the US.

They stressed the need for these efforts to “end the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories occupied in 1967 and achieving peace based on the two-state solution.”

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit said the final settlement to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can only be reached through the two-state solution. He said no alternatives that can provide the Palestinians with their own state and Israelis with security were available.

He added that the international consensus over the two-state solution should be translated into action that would save this proposal from constant Israeli attempts to undermine it.

Indirectly referring to Trump’s peace plan, Aboul Gheit remarked: “Experience over the years demonstrated that the political settlement cannot be imposed by unilateral proposals.”

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah stressed that the Kingdom’s position “is firm in standing by the Palestinian people and supporting all efforts aimed at reaching just and comprehensive peace.”

“Peace is the strategic choice that guarantees the stability of the region,” he stressed.

“We call on the international community to exert more efforts to revive the peace process that would establish a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders and with east Jerusalem as its capital,” he urged.

On Yemen, he condemned the threat posed by the Iran-backed Houthi militias to the security and stability of the war-torn country. He also slammed its repeated rocket and drone attacks against civilian locations and facilities in Saudi Arabia.

Moreover, Prince Faisal demanded that the countries most affected by Iranian threats be main parties in any international negotiations with the Iranian regime over its nuclear program and malign activities in the region.

He warned: “The gravest threats to the Arab region are the Iranian regime’s constant violations of international laws, treaties and norms that violate the security and stability of our countries.”

He cited Tehran’s interference in the affairs of Arab countries and support to armed militias that spread chaos and sow divisions.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki said: “The state of Palestine is committed to the Arab peace initiative.”

He hoped that the administration of US President Joe Biden’s approach to the conflict would reflect a “deeper historical and geographic understanding” of the region and its politics.

He added that the Palestinians were ready to join “serious negotiations through an international conference that would be based on international laws.” The conference should be led by the international quartet and aim to end the Israeli occupation and grant the Palestinians their freedom and independence.

Most Viewed

 
 
Arab World

Escape Attempts, Assassination Plots Expose Rifts within Gaza’s Armed Gangs

Palestinians try to extinguish a fire in a vehicle destroyed by an Israeli airstrike south of Gaza City on Thursday. (EPA)
Palestinians try to extinguish a fire in a vehicle destroyed by an Israeli airstrike south of Gaza City on Thursday. (EPA)
TT
TT

Escape Attempts, Assassination Plots Expose Rifts within Gaza’s Armed Gangs

Palestinians try to extinguish a fire in a vehicle destroyed by an Israeli airstrike south of Gaza City on Thursday. (EPA)
Palestinians try to extinguish a fire in a vehicle destroyed by an Israeli airstrike south of Gaza City on Thursday. (EPA)

Reports of attempted assassinations, defections and deadly escape attempts have exposed growing tensions within Israeli-backed armed gangs operating in areas of Gaza under Israeli control, according to Palestinian faction sources, Hamas security officials and statements issued by local families.

The groups operate east of the so-called Yellow Line, the boundary separating Israeli-held territory from areas controlled by Palestinian factions, primarily Hamas.

Since the October 2025 ceasefire agreement, Israeli forces have carried out near-daily strikes and targeted killings, expanded the territory under their control and, in many operations, relied on local armed groups backed by drone and artillery support.

Failed assassination attempt

Two field sources from Palestinian factions monitoring the gangs told Asharq Al-Awsat that two gunmen from Jabalia, northern Gaza, attempted to assassinate Shawqi Abu Nasira, who leads a group based north of Khan Younis and east of Deir al-Balah.

One of the men was a former member of Hamas’ armed wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, who had defected.

The attack, carried out about two weeks ago, failed for reasons that remain unclear to the Palestinian side, according to one source. Both suspects were subsequently arrested and handed over to officers from Israel’s Shin Bet security agency for questioning.

The second source maintained that the pair had acted independently, although their motives were unknown.

It was unclear whether the attempt stemmed from disputes with Abu Nasira and his associates or reflected a desire to reverse their defections and leave the gangs.

The incident comes amid reports of members abandoning their positions and returning to their families in areas west of the Yellow Line.

Internal disputes and defections

A security official from Gaza’s Hamas-run administration, who monitors the armed groups, reported growing internal friction, with some disagreements escalating into exchanges of gunfire between members and commanders.

Some disputes involved drug trafficking, while others arose from gunmen seeking to break away and return home.

Several members had contacted their families in recent months, asking them to coordinate with security agencies and clan leaders to secure permission to return and guarantees of safety, the official told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Others offered to act as informants for security bodies affiliated with the Palestinian factions or carry out attacks against the gangs.

The official cited an incident two months earlier in which a gunman attempted to assassinate Hussam al-Astal, who heads an armed group in southern Khan Younis.

According to the same source, five attempts to flee gang-controlled areas toward territory held by Palestinian factions were documented over the past two weeks.

All five men were killed by bombs dropped from quadcopter drones, the official revealed.

A field source in Rafah, southern Gaza, provided further details, reporting that Israeli drones had killed two young men three days earlier as they tried to escape from the gang formerly led by Yasser Abu Shabab, who was killed in late 2025.

The group is now headed by Ghassan al-Dahini.

Three other men were killed in two separate incidents while attempting to flee from southern and eastern Khan Younis, according to the source.

Entire families flee

In recent weeks, families in central and southern Gaza, including the Abu Shamkha, al-Assar and al-Shaer families, have issued statements mourning relatives killed while trying to return home after deciding to sever ties with the armed gangs.

Meanwhile, Hamas security forces were taken by surprise several weeks ago when entire families fled areas controlled by a group led by former Palestinian security officer Ashraf al-Mansi in northern Gaza.

Hundreds reached Hamas-controlled territory, where security personnel questioned them and established a camp to accommodate them.

The displaced families were subsequently placed under what the authorities described as “remote surveillance.”

Arab World

Fear of Another War Weighs on Lebanon amid Regional Tensions

A man removes debris from his destroyed house, in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh village, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)
A man removes debris from his destroyed house, in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh village, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)
TT
TT

Fear of Another War Weighs on Lebanon amid Regional Tensions

A man removes debris from his destroyed house, in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh village, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)
A man removes debris from his destroyed house, in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh village, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)

Lebanese people are once again confronting the possibility of war as mounting regional tensions raise fears that their country could be drawn into a wider conflict, either through Hezbollah’s involvement in a conflict involving Iran or renewed fighting with Israel.

The uncertainty is compounded by Washington’s unresolved decision on whether to resume military operations against Iran, Hezbollah’s silence over how it might respond and the Lebanese state’s inability to ensure the country remains outside the regional confrontation.

Deputy Prime Minister Tarek Mitri acknowledged “serious concerns” that a full-scale regional war could turn Lebanon into one of its battlegrounds, but cautioned that there was no concrete information pointing to such an outcome.

“We are still dealing with analysis and possibilities, not information,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat, noting that even those directly involved in mediation between Washington and Tehran lacked definitive answers.

Mitri denied that official delegations visiting Lebanon recently had advised authorities to prepare for war.

The decision to resume hostilities, he explained, would ultimately depend on US President Donald Trump, Iran’s response and Israel’s position.

“The war against Lebanon has not stopped in the first place. What we fear is that it will intensify again,” he said.

Asked about the government’s preparations for another round of fighting, Mitri pointed to its limited resources. “The state is doing everything it can on the relief front, but our capabilities are extremely limited.”

People pray inside a mosque in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh village, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)

Hezbollah remains silent

Iran-backed Hezbollah has given little indication of whether it would join a broader confrontation if Washington resumed its military campaign against Iran.

Reports suggest the group is making military and relief preparations in anticipation of renewed hostilities. Unconfirmed accounts have also said that Iran instructed Hezbollah to raise its military readiness.

Political analyst Qassem Kassir, who closely follows Hezbollah’s position, said the group had been preparing for the possibility of fresh Israeli attacks since the previous war ended.

“After every war, there is a review of what happened, lessons are drawn and preparations are made for any future confrontation,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Such measures were only natural given Israel’s continuing attacks on Lebanon, he explained. But Kassir warned against drawing conclusions about Hezbollah’s intentions in the event of a US-Iranian confrontation, noting that even the likelihood of such a conflict remained uncertain.

“Even if war breaks out, many questions remain. What kind of war would it be? What would its repercussions be? How might it develop?” he wondered.

Hezbollah does not announce its decisions in advance, he explained. Its response would depend on the nature and scale of any fighting.

While preparations for different scenarios were to be expected, Kassir said there were no signs on the ground of an impending large-scale conflict.

Demolished houses by Israeli forces in Kfar Tebnit village, are seen from Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, southern Lebanon, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP)

Displacement fears

The anxiety is already shaping decisions among residents of South Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs.

Those who can afford it continue to rent apartments in Mount Lebanon, the Iqlim al-Kharroub area and other locations considered safer when clashes between Hezbollah and Israel erupt.

For families who remain in vulnerable areas, the fear of returning to emergency shelters has become a constant concern.

Fatima M., 41, who works at a shopping center on the outskirts of Beirut’s southern suburbs, recalled taking refuge in Amchit, about 40 kilometers north of the capital, during earlier fighting.

“We are genuinely afraid of being displaced again,” she told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I work in the southern suburbs, but the shelter where I stayed was in Amchit. We cannot endure any more tragedies or disasters. It is time for us to live in peace, like everyone else.”

Lebanon still has 63 shelters housing displaced people, including 44 educational institutions and 11 institutes and other facilities affiliated with the Education Ministry.

Ministry sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that buildings no longer used for teaching had been made available for emergency accommodation.

Arab World

Political Talks Ease Tensions Over Seized Hezbollah Explosives in Lebanon

Prime Minister Nawaf Salaf (The office of the Prime Minister) 
Prime Minister Nawaf Salaf (The office of the Prime Minister) 
TT
TT

Political Talks Ease Tensions Over Seized Hezbollah Explosives in Lebanon

Prime Minister Nawaf Salaf (The office of the Prime Minister) 
Prime Minister Nawaf Salaf (The office of the Prime Minister) 

Intensive political contacts ahead of Thursday’s Lebanese cabinet meeting helped defuse tensions over a shipment of Hezbollah explosives seized in Dahr al-Baydar, amid a dispute over whether the case should be referred to the country’s highest criminal court.

Justice Minister Adel Nassar has insisted on referring the case to the Judicial Council, a move opposed by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Hezbollah amid concerns over its potential repercussions for Lebanon.

The dispute unfolded as President Joseph Aoun praised security agencies for their efforts to maintain order, while Prime Minister Nawaf Salam reaffirmed the state’s exclusive authority over weapons and decisions of war and peace.

“No one can impose any limits on us other than those set by law,” Salam declared, stressing that national security and public safety must take precedence.

Aoun calls for restraint

Opening the cabinet session, Aoun welcomed Berri’s position that the Lebanese Army was a “red line,” along with his commitment to civil peace, dialogue and understanding.

He described these principles as essential to protecting Lebanon amid mounting regional tensions.

“The challenges facing the region are enormous, and I hope they do not lead to escalation or an explosion,” Aoun warned.

He urged political leaders and ministers to exercise wisdom and restraint to shield Lebanon, already burdened by severe economic difficulties, from any further regional upheaval.

Salam: State monopoly on arms is nonnegotiable

Salam reiterated that the state’s monopoly on weapons and its exclusive authority to decide on war and peace were established principles no longer open to debate.

He grounded that position in Lebanon’s constitution, its laws, the Taif Agreement, UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and the November 2024 cessation-of-hostilities agreement.

Under the latter agreement, he explained, only the Lebanese Army, Internal Security Forces, General Security, State Security, Customs and municipal police are authorized to carry weapons.

Salam maintained that Hezbollah was being asked only to honor commitments it had already accepted, “nothing more, nothing less.”

He recalled that the government had instructed the army to prepare a plan to establish the state’s monopoly on arms, welcomed the plan last September and reaffirmed in March the need to complete its implementation across Lebanon.

“No one, whoever they may be, has the authority or jurisdiction to reconsider this except the Council of Ministers,” he emphasized.

Turning to explosives seized in Dahr al-Baydar and Qasr, the prime minister warned that storing or transporting weapons outside legally authorized institutions, regardless of the justification, violated the law and government decisions and endangered public safety.

Such violations warranted security investigations, judicial prosecution and the harshest penalties against those responsible, he argued.

“Nothing can take precedence over the country’s safety and the security of its citizens,” Salam declared.

Efforts to contain dispute

Nassar’s push to refer the explosives case to the Judicial Council has the backing of ministers from the Lebanese Forces and Kataeb parties.

However, reports indicated that Berri had received assurances the referral would not proceed following intensified contacts aimed at containing the disagreement.

On Wednesday evening, the speaker announced that ministers representing Hezbollah and its Shiite ally, the Amal Movement, would attend the cabinet session.

The political maneuvering came amid reports that Hezbollah could respond to a referral by mobilizing supporters in the streets.

The Judicial Council is an exceptional criminal court with jurisdiction over specified offenses, including crimes against the internal or external security of the state and certain offences that threaten public safety.

Cases do not automatically fall under its authority. Referral requires a cabinet decree issued on the justice minister’s recommendation, making the decision a politically sensitive matter within the government.