Damascus, Moscow Exchanged 40 Letters Documenting Difficult Stages of Syrian Conflict

Damascus, Moscow Exchanged 40 Letters Documenting Difficult Stages of Syrian Conflict
TT
20

Damascus, Moscow Exchanged 40 Letters Documenting Difficult Stages of Syrian Conflict

Damascus, Moscow Exchanged 40 Letters Documenting Difficult Stages of Syrian Conflict

The Syrian civil war, which erupted in March 2011, has officially logged a decade of torment into the Levantine country’s history. Fallout from ongoing conflict is forcing key backers of the Bashar al-Assad regime to reconsider the performance and governance of their ally.

Russia, after having invested heavily in keeping the regime in power, started questioning how its ally had run the country during difficult times.

A Syrian-Russian communication channel was set up by Damascus in cooperation with former diplomat Rami al-Shaar, who is known for his far-reaching connections at the Russian foreign ministry and staunch supporter of the regime.

Shaar was tasked with mobilizing Russian backing of Damascus.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, he recounted how he was contacted by a senior official from the regime in 2013.

Without naming the official, he said they made it clear that the regime wanted to gather more support inside Russia.

Working together, Shaar and the official exchanged over 40 letters with Russian officials.

Shaar also admitted to visiting Moscow around 20 times to ensure the channel was running and promote communication with Damascus.

After reviewing some of the correspondence between Moscow and Damascus, Asharq Al-Awsat discovered that the bulk of the letters focused on battleground developments and regime plans to retake control of Syrian territories.

Damascus has also made a number of direct distress calls to Moscow.

Russian letters, however, centered around requests for Damascus showing flexibility in negotiations with the Syrian opposition to reinforce Moscow’s efforts in finding a political settlement for the war-torn country.

“We hope that you will respond to the efforts exerted by Russia for reviving dialogue between you (the Syrian regime) and all components of the opposition,” read one of the letters sent by Moscow on December 5, 2014.



Lebanon’s President Reveals the Country’s Stance on Relations with Israel

 Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
TT
20

Lebanon’s President Reveals the Country’s Stance on Relations with Israel

 Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun looks on during a meeting with Cyprus' President Nikos Christodoulides at the Presidential Palace in the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Wednesday, July 9, 2025. (AP)

Lebanon has no plans to have normal relations with Israel at the present time, and Beirut’s main aim is to reach a “state of no war” with its southern neighbor, the country’s president said Friday.

President Joseph Aoun’s comments came as the Trump administration is trying to expand the Abraham Accords signed in 2020 in which Israel signed historic pacts with United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

In May, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa said during a visit to France that his country is holding indirect talks with Israel to prevent military activities along their border from going out of control. Talks about peace between Israel and Syria have increased following the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad from power in December.

Aoun added in comments released by his office that only the Lebanese state will have weapons in the future, and the decision on whether Lebanon would go to war or not would be for the Lebanese government.

Aoun’s comments were an apparent reference to the armed Hezbollah group that fought a 14-month war with Israel, during which it suffered major blows including the killing of some of its top political and military commanders.

Hezbollah says it has ended its armed presence near the border with Israel, but is refusing to disarm in the rest of Lebanon before Israel withdraws from five overlooking border points and ends its almost daily airstrikes on Lebanon.

Earlier this week, US envoy Tom Barrack met with Lebanese leaders in Beirut, saying he was satisfied with the Lebanese government’s response to a proposal to disarm Hezbollah.

Hezbollah’s weapons have been one of the principal sticking points since Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000. Since then, Hezbollah fought two wars with Israel, one in 2006, and the other starting a day after the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered the war in Gaza.

The Hezbollah-Israel war, which ended with a US-brokered ceasefire in November, left more than 4,000 people dead in Lebanon and caused destruction estimated at $11 billion. In Israel, 127 people, including 80 soldiers, were killed during the war.

“Peace is the state of no war and this is what is important for us in Lebanon at the present time,” Aoun was quoted as telling visitors on Friday. He added that “the matter of normalization (with Israel) is not included in Lebanon’s current foreign policy.”

Lebanon and Israel have been at a state of war since 1948.