Leading Member of Ennahda: Tunisian President Following in Gaddafi’s Footsteps

Tunisian President Kais Saied. (Reuters)
Tunisian President Kais Saied. (Reuters)
TT

Leading Member of Ennahda: Tunisian President Following in Gaddafi’s Footsteps

Tunisian President Kais Saied. (Reuters)
Tunisian President Kais Saied. (Reuters)

Tunisian President Kais Saied’s announcement that the presidency was prepared to oversee national dialogue among the youth, without the participation of political parties, labor union or the government, has drawn criticism in the country.

Former foreign minister and leading Ennahda movement member Rafik Abdel Salam dismissed the move, describing the idea of hosting a dialogue for the youth aimed at overcoming the political and social crisis as a “joke” and farce.

He added that the proposal was made by the presidency and passed down to “failed” youth organizations that are being rallied on social media.

He also compared Saied to late Libya leader Moammar al-Gaddafi, whom he alleged exploited the people to further his goals.

“Saied is moving in Gaddafi’s footsteps, who used to falsely claim that he was just a leader and that the real authority was in the hands of the people, through its popular and national committees,” said Abdel Salam.

In truth “Saied wants to move along the same path and claim that the youth have the ultimate say, whereas the president is no more than the executor of their popular agendas,” he explained.

Saied has said that the dialogue with the youth would be aimed at listening to their ideas and drafting proposals and demands over local affairs. They would later be expanded by experts with the aim of applying them on a national scale.

The president had adopted this same approach during his electoral campaign that ultimately saw him elected to office.

Spokesman for the Tunisian General Labor Union Sami al-Taheri also criticized the president’s dialogue call, saying he has disrespected the authority of the state.

He suggested that Saied was better off continuing consultations with the union, which had months ago submitted a detailed proposal about dialogue.

Taheri said the union was surprised by the president’s announcement of the youth dialogue that goes against everything he had discussed with them in past months.

The president should have informed the media that he had “backed down” from the union’s initiative, he stated.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”