Taymour Jumblatt Says Dialogue is the Only Solution to Lebanon’s Problems

A boy stands on the staircase of a riddled building in Beirut, Lebanon April 13, 2016, the anniversary of Lebanon's civil war. MOHAMED AZAKIR / REUTERS
A boy stands on the staircase of a riddled building in Beirut, Lebanon April 13, 2016, the anniversary of Lebanon's civil war. MOHAMED AZAKIR / REUTERS
TT
20

Taymour Jumblatt Says Dialogue is the Only Solution to Lebanon’s Problems

A boy stands on the staircase of a riddled building in Beirut, Lebanon April 13, 2016, the anniversary of Lebanon's civil war. MOHAMED AZAKIR / REUTERS
A boy stands on the staircase of a riddled building in Beirut, Lebanon April 13, 2016, the anniversary of Lebanon's civil war. MOHAMED AZAKIR / REUTERS

The head of the Democratic Gathering Bloc, MP Taymour Jumblatt, said that he did not remember many scenes of the Lebanese civil war. Born in 1982, he told Asharq Al-Awsat that he had memories as war began to end.

“I remember some scenes… that we were in a state of instability and we moved a lot due to the security situation, between Mukhtara and Beirut and later Syria and Jordan. Of course, there was a constant obsession about lack of safety.”

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the anniversary of the outbreak of the Lebanese civil war on April 13, 1975, Jumblatt said: “These painful and cruel memories are the most important. They are only part of the collective memory, which needs purification, reconciliation, openness and forgiveness with oneself and with others, in order to move forward.”

According to Jumblatt, “each side fought the war with the conviction that it had the right cause.”

“Everyone, in my opinion, was right in aspects of his case, but also wrong in others,” he underlined, adding: “Regardless of the justifications and circumstances that imposed the war, the Progressive Socialist Party was in the position of defending existence, survival, and identity. We had our cause, except that the whole war was a mistake.”

The son of Druze leader Walid Jumblatt stressed the importance for communication between the country’s rivals.

“The right thing is that we continue to search for dialogue… There is no solution except for dialogue,” he affirmed.

Jumblatt continued: “No matter how much we fight, we return to dialogue, because it is inevitable that we all live in this country in a framework of freedom, diversity, acceptance of others and partnership.”

He said that what is important today is to search for “how to reach stability and build a better tomorrow.”

“On the war anniversary, we remember all the victims who died, the wounded, the families, the missing and the forcibly disappeared, and the grave repercussions… We remember our reconciliation and the importance of adhering to it, because it is the cornerstone of building the future,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Jumblatt called for working towards this path by “forming an effective government, carrying out real reforms that lead to a gradual economic revival, then building political institutions on a sound democratic foundation, and administrative institutions on the basis of efficiency and production.”



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.