Virus Surge in Gaza Threatens to Overwhelm Hospitals

People, some wearing masks to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus, pray the evening prayer during the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, outside a mosque in Gaza City, Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
People, some wearing masks to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus, pray the evening prayer during the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, outside a mosque in Gaza City, Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
TT

Virus Surge in Gaza Threatens to Overwhelm Hospitals

People, some wearing masks to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus, pray the evening prayer during the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, outside a mosque in Gaza City, Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
People, some wearing masks to help prevent the spread of the coronavirus, pray the evening prayer during the Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, outside a mosque in Gaza City, Tuesday, April 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)

More than a year into the coronavirus pandemic, some of the worst fears are coming true in the crowded Gaza Strip: A sudden surge in infections and deaths is threatening to overwhelm hospitals weakened by years of conflict and border closures.

Gaza's main treatment center for COVID-19 patients warns that oxygen supplies are dwindling fast. In another hospital, coronavirus patients are packed three to a room, The Associated Press reported.

For months, Gaza's Hamas rulers seemed to have a handle on containing the pandemic. But their decision to lift most movement restrictions in February — coupled with the spread of a more aggressive virus variant and lack of vaccines — has led to a fierce second surge.

At the same time, many of Gaza's more than 2 million people ignore safety precautions, especially during the current fasting month of Ramadan. In the daytime, markets teem with shoppers buying goods for iftar, the meal breaking the fast after sundown. Few wear masks properly, if at all.

“Corona is not a game,” said Yasmin Ali, 32, whose 64-year-old mother died of the virus last week. “It will take the lives of many people if they don’t protect themselves in the first place.”

From the start, the course of the pandemic in Gaza, one of the world's most crowded territories, was largely shaped by politics. A border closure helped slow the spread initially. In the early months, Hamas quarantined small groups of travelers coming from Egypt, and the first cases of community spread were only reported in August.

A first outbreak came in the fall. Hamas tried to contain it by closing schools, mosques and markets, and by imposing a nighttime curfew. By February, infections had dropped sharply.

At that point, Hamas lifted curfews. Students were back in schools, wedding halls reopened and street markets were back. Travelers from Egypt were no longer placed in quarantine or even tested. Instead they were waved through after a temperature check, on the assumption that they had already been tested in Egypt.

The decision to reopen was in part driven by economic concerns. The closures had further battered Gaza’s long-suffering economy, where unemployment stands at roughly 50% and among young people at 70%.

Hamas may also have been concerned about prolonging unpopular measures ahead of Palestinian parliament elections. In the May 22 vote, Hamas is competing against the Fatah movement of West Bank-based Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. There's no reliable polling, but Hamas appears vulnerable to a Fatah challenge in Gaza, even as it is expected to do well in the West Bank.

The start of Ramadan in mid-April, with its crowded markets and late-night mosque prayers, further fueled infections, as did the emergence of more aggressive virus variants.

Last week, the daily death toll rose above 20 on most days, compared to a one-time daily high of 15 in the first surge. Daily infections of 1,000 to 1,500 are the new norm. The total number of infections is close to 100,000, with 848 deaths.

The European Hospital in the town of Khan Younis, the main treatment center for COVID-19 patients, is quickly running out of resources.

Its director, Yousef al-Aqqad, said 118 of 150 beds are occupied by patients in critical or serious condition. He said he would need hundreds more oxygen cylinders if the number of patients exceeds 150.

Shifa Hospital, Gaza’s largest, has 100 beds for COVID-19 patients, including 12 in the ICU. The hospital has postponed elective surgeries and closed outpatient clinics, while continuing life-saving services, such as heart operations and dialysis.

The Health Ministry said almost all of Gaza has been designated a “red zone” because of widespread community transmission.

Dr. Majdi Dhair, a senior health official, said Gaza's limited medical infrastructure made the situation worse.

The severe shortage of vaccines poses another challenge.

Israel, whose own vaccination campaign has been a success, has been broadly criticized for refusing to accept responsibility for vaccinating the Palestinians. Rights groups say that under international law, Israel remains responsible for Palestinians in areas it occupied in the 1967 Mideast war, including Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem. Israel says interim peace accords absolve it of that responsibility and that this is particularly true in Gaza, from which it withdrew in 2005, while keeping tight control over borders.

So far, Gaza has received enough doses to fully vaccinate just over 55,000 people, with shipments arriving from the United Arab Emirates and the UN-backed COVAX program.

At the same time, skepticism is widespread in Gaza, especially when it comes to the AstraZeneca vaccine, which has been linked to rare blood clots, said Dhair.

Health authorities have been urging those older than 40 to get the jab, but thousands of doses of AstraZeneca are sitting on the shelves.

In crowded Gaza, it's near impossible to keep a distance from others, AP reported.

Dhair said he also encounters widespread indifference. “There is no conviction by the people and even if we put checkpoints, they will remove the mask once they get past the policeman,” he said.

After the sharp rise in cases last week, Hamas tightened restrictions again at the urging of health officials. It reimposed night curfews and closed mosques for Ramadan evening prayers.

The after-dark lockdown dealt a new economic blow. Restaurants usually flourish in Ramadan after the faithful break their daily fast. In previous years, cafes and eateries would be full until dawn.

Ramadan provides temporary employment to 30,000 to 50,000 people, mainly restaurant workers and vendors. Most of that has gone with the new restrictions, said economist Omar Shaban.

Mamdouh Abu Hassira, whose seaside café with its view of Mediterranean sunsets is a popular Ramadan spot, had to lay off 15 of his 19 workers.

Abu Hassira said it made no sense to him to ban families from enjoying iftar at his restaurant while allowing shoppers to crowd markets during the day. “We are destroyed,” he said of his business.

Salama Marouf, a Hamas government spokesman, said managing the pandemic was a balancing act. “The confrontation with the virus is a long-term one," he said. “We try to take measures that could improve the health situation without hurting other sectors.”



Iraq Reopens Border Crossing with Iran

Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Reopens Border Crossing with Iran

Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)

Iraqi authorities reopened on Tuesday a border crossing with Iran after closing it last month amid mounting US pressure to isolate Tehran.

The Iraqi government closed the Al-Sheeb crossing in the Maysan province in October. Two political sources told AFP that the US was pressuring Baghdad to close most crossings with neighboring Iran.

The head of Iraq's border crossings authority Alaa al-Waeli told the state news agency (INA) that Al-Sheeb crossing would reopen Tuesday morning after the completion of the "necessary procedures" required to resume operations and "ensure the smooth movement of travelers and goods".

He added that authorities would temporarily close the Al-Mandali border crossing in Diyala province starting on Friday for "maintenance".

The closure of the Al-Sheeb crossing sparked tensions between the central government and local authorities in Maysan, with several protests erupting over the shutdown of a key route.

In September, Baghdad temporarily closed several crossings with Iran after authorities determined that an unclaimed drone attack on a Saudi pipeline originated from an area near Al-Sheeb.

Pro-Iran armed groups have supported Tehran during the Middle East war, claiming hundreds of attacks on US bases in Iraq and across the region.


Egypt Permanently Lists Muslim Brotherhood as Terrorist Organization

A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
TT

Egypt Permanently Lists Muslim Brotherhood as Terrorist Organization

A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 

Egyptian authorities have permanently placed the Muslim Brotherhood on the country’s list of terrorist entities, according to decisions by the Public Prosecution published in the Official Gazette on Monday.

The Brotherhood has been designated a terrorist organization in Egypt since 2013 and has been placed on the country’s terrorist entities list several times.

Most of its senior leaders, including Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie, remain in Egyptian prisons in cases involving violence and murder following the group’s removal from power that year.

Other Brotherhood members wanted by Egyptian authorities remain abroad, where they continue to lead the organization amid deep internal divisions, according to observers.

Under the latest decisions, the Public Prosecution terminated the effects of two temporary listings issued in 2022: Decision No. 6 concerning terrorist entities and Decision No. 13 concerning individuals designated as terrorists. Both were published in Egypt’s official legal gazette, Al-Waqa’i Al-Masriyya, on January 3, 2023.

Prosecutors also ordered the Brotherhood’s permanent inclusion on the list of terrorist entities.

The decision permanently added three Brotherhood figures convicted under final, binding court rulings to the list of designated terrorists.

They were identified as Abdel Rahman Hassan Mohamed Meligy, Jamal Abdel Hamid Jomaa and Osama Ibrahim Mohamed Mostafa.

The Public Prosecution cited Law No. 8 of 2015, governing lists of terrorist entities and individuals, and its subsequent amendments as the legal basis for the decisions.

A judicial source familiar with the procedures explained that listing an individual as a terrorist automatically triggers measures including asset freezes, travel bans, placement on arrival watchlists and the withdrawal or cancellation of passports.

According to observers, publication of the decision in the Official Gazette also activates a range of restrictions against the Brotherhood, including a ban on the organization, suspension of all its activities and closure of its premises.

The measures prohibit direct or indirect financing, fundraising and the collection of material donations on its behalf, as well as civic or religious outreach activities conducted under any name.

Local media reports on Monday explained that the main distinction between temporary and permanent designation lies in their legal basis.

Temporary listing follows a judicial decision issued at the request of the prosecutor general, while permanent designation is based on a final criminal conviction against an organization or individual.

International Campaign Against Brotherhood Expands

The campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood has expanded across the Arab world and internationally in recent months.

In May, US President Donald Trump’s administration discussed a national counterterrorism strategy that focused primarily on the Brotherhood, portraying it as the ideological source of modern extremist terrorism.

The move followed Washington’s designation in January of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and its branches in Jordan and Lebanon as terrorist organizations.

In March, the United States added the Brotherhood’s Sudanese branch to the same list.

Argentina also moved earlier this year to designate the Brotherhood’s branches in Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon as terrorist organizations.


Palestinians Await Eisenkot Govt While Not Expecting Radical Change

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

Palestinians Await Eisenkot Govt While Not Expecting Radical Change

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)

Palestinian leaders are closely watching Israeli Prime Minister-designate Gadi Eisenkot’s efforts to form a government and unseat Benjamin Netanyahu, hoping for a shift in Israeli policy after four years of hostility.

Although the Palestinian Authority (PA) has refrained from commenting publicly on Israel’s election results, officials are scrutinizing Eisenkot’s statements and political moves for signs of a possible change in relations.

The PA has maintained its longstanding position that Israeli elections are an internal matter. Yet few have more at stake in the outcome after four years in which Netanyahu’s government waged an unrelenting campaign against the Palestinian Authority and Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Palestinian officials, including President Mahmoud Abbas, declared before the elections that they were prepared to engage with any Israeli government. They have stopped short, however, of speaking of a new chapter in relations.

Judging policies, not personalities

Mahmoud al-Habbash, an adviser to Abbas, stressed that the PA would judge any incoming Israeli prime minister by their policies and positions on the Palestinian issue.

“It is too early to judge Eisenkot,” Habbash told Asharq Al-Awsat. “We do not judge individuals. Frankly, the names of those governing Israel do not matter to us.”

“What matters are their actual positions, policies and programs concerning the Palestinian issue, and their commitment to international legitimacy and international law,” he stressed.

These factors will determine the PA’s relationship with any Israeli prime minister or government, he added.

Habbash declined to say whether Eisenkot was the PA’s preferred candidate, reiterating that it was premature to assess him or a government he had yet to form.

Nevertheless, he said: “We hope for a different Israeli leadership that respects international legitimacy and the agreements signed, beginning with Oslo, the Paris Agreement and subsequent accords.”

Such a leadership should have the willingness, determination and political program to put negotiations back on track toward an agreement ending the current situation, he said.

Eisenkot opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state, the PA’s central political objective. However, he has shown greater openness than Netanyahu toward strengthening the PA and transferring withheld Palestinian revenues.

He has also previously argued against Israel directly ruling millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as an occupying power.

Habbash stressed that relations between Palestinians and the Israeli government involve interconnected political, economic and administrative issues.

“These range from everyday matters affecting people’s lives and needs to clearance revenues, compliance with signed agreements and, ultimately, Israel’s position on our legitimate national rights,” he explained.

“If Eisenkot translates his words into action, we will respond positively and remain open to dialogue,” Habbash affirmed.

‘Anyone is better than Netanyahu’

Behind closed doors, PA officials said that almost any alternative would be preferable to Netanyahu, whom they accuse of seeking to dismantle the Authority, displace Palestinians and eliminate their national cause.

They have avoided making such views public for fear their statements could be exploited in Israel’s domestic political struggle.

“It is not about Eisenkot. Any Israeli would be better for us than Netanyahu and his current government,” a senior Palestinian official told Asharq Al-Awsat. “This is the most hostile government Palestinians have ever known - a government of extermination.”

During Israel’s 2022 elections, the PA reportedly sought to help defeat Netanyahu, prompting Israel’s domestic security agency, Shin Bet, to warn against interference in the electoral process.

This time, the PA did not seek to intervene, but maintained various channels of communication with Arab party leaders.

Palestinian officials have expressed pride in the number of seats won by Arab parties in the Knesset, whose electoral gains effectively prevented Netanyahu from remaining in power.

Improve conditions

At a minimum, Palestinian officials hope Eisenkot will ease economic pressures and improve security conditions in the occupied territories.

“We are not suggesting that Eisenkot is a savior. We know he will not lead us to statehood,” an informed Palestinian source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“But many other crucial issues are at stake: the future of the PA, the economy, clearance revenues, the West Bank, security conditions, settler violence, the future of Gaza, reconstruction and governance.”

The source hoped for progress on these issues, describing any improvement as a potential foundation for further engagement. Nevertheless, the Palestinian leadership remains cautious and does not expect a decisive policy shift.

Change in form, not substance

Palestine Liberation Organization Executive Committee member Wasel Abu Yousef was more skeptical, saying that a change in Israeli leadership would affect appearances rather than fundamental policy.

“There may be change, but it will be in form, not substance,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“They agree on legitimizing settlements, preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state, separating the Gaza Strip and rejecting international resolutions. They are pursuing the Greater Israel project and, to varying degrees, denying the rights and existence of the Palestinian people.”

Meaningful change would require recognition of Palestinian self-determination and the establishment of an independent state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, he said.

Habbash similarly reiterated the PA’s willingness to engage while insisting that economic relief alone could not resolve the conflict.

“Our cause is not merely about daily living conditions or improving livelihoods. It is about political rights, foremost among them the establishment of a Palestinian state and an end to the occupation.”