FM: Syrian Presidential Elections ‘Far Better’ than the US

Banners and posters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on a street in Damascus before the elections (AFP)
Banners and posters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on a street in Damascus before the elections (AFP)
TT

FM: Syrian Presidential Elections ‘Far Better’ than the US

Banners and posters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on a street in Damascus before the elections (AFP)
Banners and posters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on a street in Damascus before the elections (AFP)

Syria will hold Wednesday its second presidential elections since the outbreak of the conflict, and they are all but certain to deliver a fourth term for President Bashar al-Assad.

Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal al-Mikdad said that the presidential elections are “thousands of times better” than in the US, which he described as “a farce.”

Mikdad described the voting processes in Syria’s embassies as “very remarkable” and having an “atmosphere of freedom and democracy” in which Syrians expressed “their views with great precision and freedom.”

Mikdad was speaking after the delivery of the voting results at Syrian embassies to the Justice Ministry. He said that the elections inside the country will reflect the views of all Syrians, despite all the propaganda made by the “malicious media, politicians and criminals.”

“When Syrians go to polling stations in all provinces next Wednesday, they will demonstrate their commitment to their homeland, the reconstruction, the fight against terrorism, and their support to their army till achieving the final victory,” Mikdad was quoted by SANA.

In the capital Damascus, Assad's portraits line roads and inundate main squares, outnumbering those of his two little-known challengers. They are former state minister Abdallah Salloum Abdallah and Mahmoud Merhi.

His campaign slogan, "Hope through Work", evokes the reconstruction of a country ravaged by a decade-long conflict that has claimed more than 388,000 lives and displaced half of Syria's pre-war population.

Fabrice Balanche, a geographer and specialist in the political geography of Syria, believes that Syrians will vote to “pledge allegiance to Assad and to the regime.”

By holding elections on a regular basis, Assad is attempting to prove that "Syrian institutions are functioning," he said.

However, elections will only be held in two-thirds of the country under regime control. Syrians who voted in their country's embassies and consulates abroad are of course not among the millions of opponents who have fled the country.

Several Western countries say the vote is a sham and neither free nor fair.

One of the conditions for running for elections states that the candidate must have resided in Syria continuously during the past ten years, which means no opposition figure residing abroad is allowed to run.

Assad refrained from holding any press interviews or events during the electoral campaign. However, he recently issued a series of decisions and laws in an attempt to improve the economic and service situation, including a general amnesty for thousands of prisoners.

Bashar’s campaign team published a promotional video on the Facebook page ahead of the polls.

"Bashar's election campaign emphasizes his role as the man who won a war (and) has big ideas for Syria's reconstruction," said Nicholas Heras of the Newlines Institute in Washington.

It presents him as “the only person who can manage the resumption of order and reconstruction from the chaos of the Syrian conflict.”

According to Heras, Assad's campaign targets international donors more than Syrian voters, saying he is running “a long infomercial for potential foreign backers that he is their only choice for stability after Syria's war.”

The regime forces regained control over several areas after receiving direct military support from Iran and Russia.

After years of “diplomatic estrangement”, the UAE has taken several steps towards rapprochement with Syria and reopened its embassy in Damascus. It also provided medical aid.

The international community wants to ensure a political settlement in Syria through the UN-sponsored Constitutional Committee, formed in 2019, which held several meetings in Geneva without any results.

The UN hoped the committee's work would pave the way for developing a new constitution, which will be the basis for the presidential elections and under its supervision. The delegations failed to reach an agreement before the vote.

Syria expert Samuel Ramani believes the election "will be a major setback for the constitutional process” and it will “reaffirm to the international community, Russia and Iran included, just how difficult a settlement will be."

In 2014, Assad won the polls with 88 percent of the vote, however, a European diplomat believes that this time, Assad is running the “risk of being the only certainty in a country in ruins.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”