Episode 2: Saddam Proposed a ‘Secret Summit’ with Assad in 1996 to Confront ‘Israel’s Aggression’ against Lebanon

Asharq Al-Awsat Publishes Secret Letters between the Syrian, Iraqi Presidents in the mid-1990s

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. (Getty Images)
Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. (Getty Images)
TT

Episode 2: Saddam Proposed a ‘Secret Summit’ with Assad in 1996 to Confront ‘Israel’s Aggression’ against Lebanon

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. (Getty Images)
Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. (Getty Images)

The first episode of the secret messages between Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and his Syrian counterpart, Hafez al-Assad, focused on the beginning of talks after years of mistrust, disappointment and conspiracies between Damascus and Baghdad.

Today’s episode talks about the resumption of relations, the reactivation of the oil pipeline between the two countries, and making Syria a gateway to implementing the “oil-for-food” agreement with the United Nations in the mid-1990s.

Asharq Al-Awsat is revealing letters between Saddam and Assad, which are part of the many documents that late Syrian Vice President Abdel-Halim Khaddam carried from his office to Paris when he left Syria in 2005. Phone and text interviews were conducted with Iraqi Ambassador Anwar Al-Qaisi to verify the authenticity of the documents.

Al-Qaisi said that Saddam called him in the spring of 1996 during the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, and told him to inform Syria that all of Iraq’s capabilities were at Damascus’ disposal.

That year, Saddam had a growing concern about the policies of Jordan’s King Hussein, as he wrote to Assad again in March 1996, saying: “The recent statements of King Hussein prior to his visit to Washington confirm the information available to us that he was accelerating the pace to push the United States, and behind it the Zionist enemy, for the conclusion of a military agreement that leads to the formation of a new regional alliance in the region, of which Israel and Turkey will be the backbone, and which is certainly directed against Iraq and Syria.”

An Arab envoy, who transmitted the “messages”, spoke of a conviction in Baghdad that Hussein Kamel (Saddam’s son-in-law) returned to the Iraqi capital as part of King Hussein’s plan, so he was liquidated.

Khaddam recounted that on the first of March 1996, he met with Al-Qaisi, who conveyed the following message: “President Saddam sends his greetings to his brother, President Hafez, and to you. He expresses his satisfaction with the congruence of views, whether in seeking to open a new chapter in Arab life, beginning with the resumption of fraternal relations, or in identifying the nature of the American-Zionist scheme, which Jordan has become a part of.”

According to the minutes of the meeting, Saddam expressed concern that the recent statements by King Hussein prior to his visit to Washington confirmed information that he was pushing the United States to conclude a military agreement that leads to the formation of a new alliance in the region.

Thus, he underlined the need to take urgent steps, saying: “Iraq, for its part, will announce the resumption of diplomatic relations, and then Syria will welcome the initiative; moreover, the two countries will hold security talks at the level of the heads of the security apparatuses.”

Saddam also proposed the opening of the borders within controls agreed upon by the two parties, adding that his country, in its discussions with the United Nations, would adopt Syria as an outlet for the export of its oil, if an agreement was reached over the “oil for food and medicine” program.

In response to the Iraqi proposal, Khaddam replied: “The truth is that there are some circumstances that have delayed our move... We are keen to achieve Arab contacts so that the situation does not become more complicated.”

He said he was keen to inform the Iraqi ambassador about the communication with the Iraqi opposition, “due to our agreement with Iran to hold a conference for the Iraqi opposition, so that they do not interpret our move with Baghdad as a maneuver.”

Khaddam recounted: “At the end of the meeting, I told him that I would present the letter to President Hafez.”

He continued: “On March 3, 1996, I received Al-Qaisi and told him that we did not have the opportunity to make contacts for the reasons I mentioned in our earlier meeting: King Hussein’s tour to Arab countries, the Emir of Kuwait’s trip to Washington, the Iranian Vice President’s visit to Damascus, the visit of the President of Sudan…”

The Syrian vice president also told his interlocutor: “We believe that direct contacts and meetings would create opportunities to improve Arab relations and facilitate the realization of our visions, whether with regard to the general Arab situation or confronting the American-Israeli plot... We believe that this path is the least harmful, because if we surprised them with any direct step, the situation will get more complicated. We will contact you to set a date for the meeting.”

Yahya Bakour, Director General of the Arab Organization for Agricultural Development, submitted to Khaddam a report on his visit to Baghdad between May 31 and June 4, 1996.

According to the report, Al-Qaisi visited Bakour and stressed “the importance that Baghdad attaches at this stage to restoring relations with Damascus, in response to the attack that America and Israel are plotting in cooperation with Jordan and Turkey, against both Iraq and Syria.”

Al-Qaisi said Saddam called him “during the aggression against Lebanon, and requested him to inform Damascus that all of Iraq’s capabilities were at Syria’s disposal, and that they wanted a sign in this regard.”

The Iraqi president reportedly called him again before the Eid holiday, to try to arrange a meeting with Assad. Saddam, according to the Iraqi president, was “confident that the mere holding of the meeting would lead to the resolution of all outstanding issues…”

The Iraqi ambassador to Qatar revealed that Saddam contacted him to inquire about the reasons for the US chief of staff’s visit to the region, and that he saw “a letter signed by President Bill Clinton, in which he asks him to agree to the formation of a Middle Eastern Security Council, including Turkey, Jordan, Israel, Qatar, Egypt and other countries, whose mission is to combat terrorism, arrange the affairs of the region and punish countries that support terrorism.”

According to Bakour, “on the second day, the program included meetings with the minister of agriculture. The undersecretary of the ministry informed me that Professor Tariq Aziz was waiting for me. The meeting was held at his office in the sole presence of Mr. Anwar Sabri Abdel Razzaq.”

Bakour said in this regard: “[Aziz] emphasized that there was a major conspiracy against the region, not only targeting Iraq, but also Syria and Iran. He said that America will single out the Arab countries separately…”

Aziz added, according to the report: “Iraq tried to build bridges with the Iranians and improve relations with them, and they took good steps in opening borders and developing trade relations based on the exchange of Iranian goods with oil derivatives and other Iraqi merchandise. This was in the interest of both countries. But the problem with the Iranians is that their leadership lacks a unified stance, and this is reflected in their behavior and opinions in every meeting.”

Bakour added: “Aziz believed that the establishment of cooperation between Iraq and Syria would improve the work environment in the region, give hope to the Arab populations and thwart the current conspiracy targeting Syria, Iraq and Iran together.”

The director general of the Arab Organization for Agricultural Development also recounted a meeting with then-Iraqi Foreign Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, who was enthusiastic about improving relations with Syria.

Bakour’s account also revealed a meeting with Saddam, in the presence of al-Sahhaf: “At 10 am on Monday, June 3, 1996, Anwar Sabri informed me that al-Sahhaf would be with me to meet Saddam. After arriving at the president’s residence, we entered directly into the main hall […].”

Saddam started by sending his regards to Assad and Khaddam, and said: “We are familiar with all the previous contacts and their details, which are positive and confirm keenness to confront difficult circumstances and conspiracy against the two countries… We look for the establishment of a relationship between Syria and Iraq on new foundations, which are based on trust […]”

He continued: “King Hussein is very mistaken for his association with the foreigners. I had advised him to be free in his relations and to act according to his country’s interests, and not harm Iraq, but he chose the opposite […]”

The Iraqi president noted that the transfer of oil through Syria was a strategic matter for his country.

“I hope you will inform our brothers that we are ready to cooperate in this field, and to send a delegation to complete the necessary formalities, as well as to study the technical matters and requirements for preparing the pipeline. We hope to receive an answer quickly,” Saddam was quoted by Bakour as saying.



Netanyahu and Trump on Collision Course as US, Iran Agree to Halt War

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a news conference in Jerusalem, 15 June 2026, following the announcement of a US-Iran mediated preliminary framework to end regional military hostilities. (EPA)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a news conference in Jerusalem, 15 June 2026, following the announcement of a US-Iran mediated preliminary framework to end regional military hostilities. (EPA)
TT

Netanyahu and Trump on Collision Course as US, Iran Agree to Halt War

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a news conference in Jerusalem, 15 June 2026, following the announcement of a US-Iran mediated preliminary framework to end regional military hostilities. (EPA)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu holds a news conference in Jerusalem, 15 June 2026, following the announcement of a US-Iran mediated preliminary framework to end regional military hostilities. (EPA)

Benjamin Netanyahu bet that his joint war alongside Donald Trump would topple Iran's clerical rulers and bolster himself ahead of elections at home, as the architect of a US-Israeli alliance that would reshape the Middle East.

Instead, Israel's longest-serving prime minister is on a collision course with Trump as the US president seeks to extricate himself from the war, with both men's goals unmet and Israeli military operations tied down in Lebanon.

For now, Israeli officials have been cautious in public for fear of angering their most important ally, known for being prickly towards critics.

But in private conversations, the frustration is clear. The preliminary agreement is "terrible for Israel," said one senior Israeli official, giving a frank assessment on condition of anonymity. "And there is no one in the Israeli leadership who views it otherwise, from the prime minister to the chief of staff."

Washington says that over the next 60 days, when a ceasefire is in place, it will negotiate full terms that will address US and Israeli concerns, especially over Iran's nuclear program.

But Israeli officials told Reuters they thought the negotiating period under the deal was likely to be extended, tying Israel's hands from taking military action, while its concerns remain unresolved.

Netanyahu and Trump have repeatedly clashed over Israel's refusal to constrain its pursuit of Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, where a cessation of hostilities is a key Iranian demand.

At the start of the month, Trump described ‌Netanyahu as "[expletive] crazy" in ‌an angry phone call, ordering him not to strike Beirut while the US was seeking a deal with Iran.

Netanyahu called ‌off attacks ⁠that day, but ⁠struck Beirut's southern suburbs a week later, provoking Iranian missile strikes on Israel and a public rebuke of both sides from Trump.

Hours before the US and Iran announced their interim deal, Israel hit the Lebanese capital again on Sunday, after rockets were launched at Israel from Lebanon, fire Trump described as "small and meaningless".

Netanyahu said that Israel has emerged "strong and steady," with a leadership that stands firm and wise. At a press conference in Jerusalem late on Monday, he acknowledged that he and Trump have sometimes had their differences.

"He is the president of the United States, I am the prime minister of Israel. We many times see eye-to-eye and there are times when we see eye-to-eye less so. I am in charge of Israel's security interests," Netanyahu said.

Netanyahu, facing autumn elections he is projected to lose, may be more willing to defy Trump as he contends with an Israeli public that opinion polls show has grown skeptical of the US president's commitment to Israel's security.

"This is ⁠a pretty stark moment of divergence of interests," said Dan Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel under the Obama administration, now ‌with the Atlantic Council think tank.

"He will try to not openly oppose (the deal), so as not to get into ‌a brawl with Trump," said Shapiro. "But he will indicate Israel is not bound by it, and Israel reserves its rights."

ISRAEL SAYS IT'S NOT BOUND BY US-IRAN PACT

The memorandum of understanding between the US ‌and Iran is expected to be signed on Friday in Switzerland. While precise terms were not immediately known, mediator Pakistan said the pact called for a permanent halt to military ‌operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.

Netanyahu said that Israel would keep its forces in southern Lebanon and maintain “freedom of action” against Hezbollah attacks.

"Iran wanted us to withdraw from it but I stood firm," he told reporters.

"We are keeping our freedom of action and we are keeping the security zone to protect (Israel's) northern citizens," he said.

The interim deal would reopen the Strait of Hormuz oil chokepoint while leaving the fate of Tehran's nuclear program to be resolved during a 60-day negotiation period towards a final deal.

Two other issues that Netanyahu and Trump had both declared as justifications for the war at its outset - curbing Iran's missile ‌program and ending its support for regional armed groups - are not thought to be on the agenda during those talks.

Three Israeli officials said Israel sees it as very likely the 60-day pact will be extended to 90 days, with the US maintaining ⁠its deployment of military assets in the region ⁠as it negotiates a broader deal.

Two other Israeli officials said that Israel was caught by surprise last week when Trump first said that a deal with Iran was close. They acknowledged that Israel has had little success in influencing the talks.

All of the officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak publicly.

NETANYAHU UNABLE TO SELL THIS AGREEMENT TO ISRAELI PUBLIC, ANALYST SAYS

Netanyahu, who often clashed with Washington under the administrations of Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden, has long portrayed himself to the Israeli public as being uniquely adept in dealing with the Republican Trump.

During Trump's first term, Israel secured major policy changes from Washington, which moved its embassy to Jerusalem and backed the Abraham Accords that brought Israel formal diplomatic ties with the UAE and Bahrain.

On Iran, Trump ditched a nuclear agreement negotiated under Obama that Israel had long complained was too soft.

During elections in 2019, Netanyahu displayed massive campaign billboards in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem showing him and Trump smiling and shaking hands.

But now, the US-Iran pact undermines Netanyahu's case that a close relationship with Trump sets him apart from other candidates for prime minister, said Jonathan Rynhold, a political scientist at Bar-Ilan University, near Tel Aviv.

"(Netanyahu) will be unable to sell this agreement to the Israeli public," Rynhold said. "The best that he can hope for is that they fail to reach an agreement and the war restarts to Israel's advantage in 60 days."

According to a poll released on Friday by the Israel Democracy Institute, just 41% of Jewish Israelis think their security is a central consideration for Trump, down from 64% in March.

Eli Cohen, Netanyahu's energy minister, said that Israel would be prepared to act alone if Iran rebuilds its nuclear and missile capabilities, though he said the chances of Tehran taking that step during Trump's tenure were low.

"If Iran tries to renew its nuclear and ballistic missile programs - we will be there and act," Cohen told Israel's public broadcaster Kan.


US-Iran Deal Leaves Major Lebanon Questions Unresolved

Displaced families drive past a man holding the Hezbollah party flag as they drive along the highway through the area of Jiyyeh as they return to their home villages in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
Displaced families drive past a man holding the Hezbollah party flag as they drive along the highway through the area of Jiyyeh as they return to their home villages in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
TT

US-Iran Deal Leaves Major Lebanon Questions Unresolved

Displaced families drive past a man holding the Hezbollah party flag as they drive along the highway through the area of Jiyyeh as they return to their home villages in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
Displaced families drive past a man holding the Hezbollah party flag as they drive along the highway through the area of Jiyyeh as they return to their home villages in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)

A deal between Washington and Tehran that ends the Israel-Hezbollah war leaves many issues in Lebanon unresolved, failing to mention Israel withdrawing from the country or an end to Tehran's support for the armed group.

Under US pressure, Lebanese officials have been holding direct talks with Israel aimed at reaching a separate agreement on ending the hostilities, but Beirut appeared to have been sidelined with the overnight announcement on the regional conflict.

AFP looks at the deal and the questions it raises in Lebanon.

- What does the deal involve? -

Details of the agreement to end the Middle East war on all fronts have not been made public, but Iran and mediator Pakistan have both said it includes Lebanon.

Hezbollah drew the country into the Middle East war on March 2 with rocket fire at Israel to avenge the killing of Iran's supreme leader in US-Israeli strikes.

Israel responded with airstrikes and a ground invasion that Lebanon says have killed more than 3,700 people and displaced more than one million others.

An official source told AFP that "Lebanon was not informed of the terms of the agreement or the time of the ceasefire".

Influential Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, a Hezbollah ally and intermediary for the group, thanked Washington and Tehran for their "insistence on including... an essential and binding clause on halting the Israeli aggression on all of Lebanon".

Hezbollah on Monday had so far not claimed any fresh attacks on Israeli targets.

- Israeli withdrawal? -

Information circulating about the deal does not mention any Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon, and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Monday said forces would remain in the country indefinitely.

Karim Bitar, a lecturer in Middle East Studies at the Sciences Po University in Paris, said that "the deal does not seem to involve Israel, which immediately meant that it wasn't a party to it... So it's very unlikely that there will be an Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon."

Israeli forces control a strip of Lebanese territory running along the entire border.

A Western military source told AFP that Israeli forces had crossed the Litani River at several points, referring to the waterway running about 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the frontier but closer in some areas.

"Tens of thousands of Israeli soldiers" are in south Lebanon where they hold some established positions, the source said, adding that Hezbollah still had a presence there.

"It's the biggest invasion since their withdrawal in 2000," the source said, referring to Israel's previous pullout after some two decades of occupation.

Hezbollah says it sent reinforcements south of the Litani after the latest war erupted.

Under a 2024 ceasefire that followed a previous round of hostilities, Hezbollah fighters were supposed to withdraw from the area.

- What future for Hezbollah? -

Washington has pressured Lebanese authorities to disarm Hezbollah for months, but the accord makes no mention of the group.

"Iran doesn't seem to have committed to ending its support and financing for Hezbollah," Bitar said.

Military expert Riad Kahwaji said that "Hezbollah will not agree to give up arms... and this crisis will be protracted."

He said this could lead to political instability and even unrest, "especially now Hezbollah believes that through Iran it has emerged victorious from this agreement, and therefore is going to try and dictate its terms on who rules."

- Lebanon-Israel negotiations? -

Lebanon and Israel have been holding direct talks in Washington since April, seeking to end the hostilities and to separate Lebanon from the regional war.

A new round is scheduled for later this month.

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Monday that "we will redouble our efforts" through the Washington negotiations "to secure a full Israeli withdrawal."

But after the Iran-US announcement, some cast doubt on the effectiveness of the bilateral negotiations.

Bitar said that "Lebanon could find itself once again as a scapegoat that pays the price both of American amateurism, Iranian cynicism, Israeli hubris and... the lack of a clear strategy from its own political class."


Lebanese Mourn Homes, Livelihoods Destroyed by Israel in Southern City

 People make their way through the rubble of a destroyed building as residents displaced by fighting return to Nabatieh in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
People make their way through the rubble of a destroyed building as residents displaced by fighting return to Nabatieh in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Lebanese Mourn Homes, Livelihoods Destroyed by Israel in Southern City

 People make their way through the rubble of a destroyed building as residents displaced by fighting return to Nabatieh in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)
People make their way through the rubble of a destroyed building as residents displaced by fighting return to Nabatieh in southern Lebanon on June 15, 2026. (AFP)

When Kamal Kamal heard a ceasefire deal had been agreed between Iran and the United States, he rushed back to the southern city of Nabatieh only to find an Israeli strike had reduced his life's work to rubble.

The city, usually home to some 90,000 people before the latest war between Israel and Hezbollah erupted on March 2, was largely deserted as Israel pressed its military offensive in the area in recent days.

Kamal fought back tears as he stared stunned at the pile of rubble that used to be his roastery and warehouse for coffee and other products, after Israel pummeled the region with strikes and issued sweeping evacuation orders.

"When I opened it in the seventies, I was still a young man... now nothing is left," he said, leaning heavily on a walking stick and surveying the vast destruction.

"How my life has been spent in vain here!"

The war in Lebanon has been included in the framework deal to end the broader Middle East war.

But Lebanon's army on Monday urged displaced residents to delay their return to southern border villages, citing the "risk of Israeli violations and attacks".

Iran-backed group Hezbollah issued a similar warning.

Yet residents who have cautiously returned to Nabatieh have expressed dismay at the huge damage Israel inflicted on the city's neighborhoods and its famed market, where the roofing had collapsed and shops were devastated.

An AFP photographer also saw destruction to homes and businesses in the city, which has served as a hub of economic, social and services activity.

- 'Sorrow and grief' -

The city's municipality said in a statement that it had asked residents not to return "at the present time under any circumstances", citing the security situation.

The Lebanese army had set up a checkpoint at the entrance to the city, advising locals about the roads that they could take as intermittent artillery shelling rang out and smoke rose up.

The flow of residents to Nabatieh picked up later in the day, with people inspecting their homes and properties as heavy machinery worked to remove rubble and clear roads.

In one heavily damaged neighborhood, Rana Nasrallah surveyed her destroyed home, the rubble strewn with clothes, furniture and pot plants.

The 45-year-old had fled with her family to the coastal city of Sidon during the war.

"We grew up in this neighborhood. We used to play here as children. And here's where the older women used to sit and chat, the historic Nabatieh market before us... the landmarks that they perhaps wanted to erase," she said.

"As soon as the ceasefire was declared and before any official (Lebanese) announcement... we got going and came here. We couldn't wait any longer.

"We came to breathe in the scent of our land... even if there are no homes to shelter us and there is no work, still it's a relief for our souls."

In the face of the huge damage in Nabatieh and other south Lebanon towns and villages, including where Israeli forces have carried out sweeping demolitions, Nasrallah still expressed hope of returning permanently.

"Despite the sorrow and grief at seeing the city destroyed... we are filled with hope that we will rebuild," she said.

"Not once did we feel defeated or that we would not triumph, or that we would not return to rebuild Nabatieh."