‘Don’t Come Back, We Want to Leave,’ Syrians Advise Returning Refugees

A portrait of president Bashar al-Assad stands in Damascus on May 3, 2021. (AFP)
A portrait of president Bashar al-Assad stands in Damascus on May 3, 2021. (AFP)
TT
20

‘Don’t Come Back, We Want to Leave,’ Syrians Advise Returning Refugees

A portrait of president Bashar al-Assad stands in Damascus on May 3, 2021. (AFP)
A portrait of president Bashar al-Assad stands in Damascus on May 3, 2021. (AFP)

“Don’t come back, we want to leave,” is the advice Syrians residing in their home country offer to refugees abroad.

A report by the Syrian Association for Citizens’ Dignity (SACD) found that more and more people were seeking to leave regions held by the regime.

The 83-page report includes the results of 533 interviews held with Syrians residing in those regions. “A large number of Syrians feel unsafe, with the perception of safety heavily tied to the area’s perceived threat to the regime,” said the report.

“People forced to return to regime control from displacement or through ‘reconciliation’ do not feel safe, with significantly higher levels of fear in their daily lives.”

“Their feeling of insecurity is being informed by events that were directly witnessed or experienced. Some 50% of people in the [president Bashar] Assad-controlled areas don’t feel safe, including those who never left; 67% of returnees from outside Syria don’t feel safe, and those in the reconciliation areas fear worst with 94% saying they don’t feel safe. Most cite the security authorities’ grip and fear of rampant insecurity and crime as their reasons for feeling safe.”

“That said, there are no safe areas, with some of the more practical measures of safety showing that security is poor everywhere, because it’s due to security policies by the same authority,” noted the report.

“The reconciliation areas present the worse deterioration in the sense of insecurity amongst survey respondents,” it found. “While 74 percent of participants in the SACD’s 2019 survey reported not feeling safe in their areas, this figure increased to 94 percent in the 2020 survey.”

“Surprisingly, the same trend was observed in areas controlled by the regime since 2011, where perceptions of insecurity jumped from 39 percent in 2019 to 51 percent in 2020. These numbers clearly indicate that the reconciliation areas have failed to provide security to citizens, and that the regime’s security policies and general practices are weakening the sense of security amongst Syrians,” it added.

“The intention to leave regime-controlled areas specifically in reconciliation areas and areas controlled since 2011 has noticeably increased. In the case of reconciliation areas, 48 percent of survey participants in 2019 had the intention of leaving regime-controlled areas, while the percentage increased to 68 percent in 2020. In areas controlled by the regime since 2011, the percentage went up from 23 percent in 2019 to 47 percent in 2020.”

“These numbers are in line with those detailed in a March 2021 Norwegian Refugee Council report, which predicted that Syria will experience the displacement of another 6 million refugees in the next decade if the conflict continues.”

SACD member Houda Atassi said the establishment of a secure environment for all Syrians should be a main issue in the political process.

SACD trustee Fadi Nezhat said regime and Russian guarantees mean nothing on the ground, as arrest campaigns and forced disappearances of people are still rampant.



Hamas Comes Under Pressure in Lebanon

The Supreme Defense Council, chaired by President Joseph Aoun, issued a recommendation to the government to warn Hamas against using Lebanese territory for any actions that undermine national security (Lebanese Presidency)
The Supreme Defense Council, chaired by President Joseph Aoun, issued a recommendation to the government to warn Hamas against using Lebanese territory for any actions that undermine national security (Lebanese Presidency)
TT
20

Hamas Comes Under Pressure in Lebanon

The Supreme Defense Council, chaired by President Joseph Aoun, issued a recommendation to the government to warn Hamas against using Lebanese territory for any actions that undermine national security (Lebanese Presidency)
The Supreme Defense Council, chaired by President Joseph Aoun, issued a recommendation to the government to warn Hamas against using Lebanese territory for any actions that undermine national security (Lebanese Presidency)

Relations between Hamas and the Lebanese state have entered a critical phase not seen since the country’s civil war era. In a rare and direct move, Lebanon’s Supreme Defense Council on Friday named Hamas in an official warning, cautioning the group against using Lebanese territories to conduct activities that threaten national security.

The warning follows rocket attacks in March, allegedly launched by Hamas operatives toward Israel from southern Lebanon, and signals a turning point in Beirut’s handling of the longstanding issue of Palestinian arms.

The issue is expected to dominate discussions during the upcoming visit of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to Beirut on May 21. Lebanese authorities are reportedly preparing to demand that Hamas hand over individuals implicated in the rocket attacks.

Hamas officials in Lebanon declined to comment immediately, but sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that an official statement from the group is forthcoming.

Last month, the Lebanese army said it had identified those responsible for the March 22 and 28 rocket launches, revealing a cell composed of Lebanese and Palestinian nationals. Subsequent raids led to several arrests and the seizure of equipment used in the attacks. Security sources later confirmed the detention of three Hamas members - two Palestinians and one Lebanese.

Analysts and insiders believe Hamas now finds itself increasingly isolated in Lebanon. According to Palestinian political analyst Hisham Debassy, the group has little choice but to comply with Lebanese demands, including potentially disarming.

“The Defense Council’s position marks a serious and strategic shift,” said Debassy. “It sends a strong political message not just to Hamas but to any non-state actor operating militarily on Lebanese soil.”

Debassy described Hamas as being at a crossroads. “Either it cooperates with Lebanese authorities by handing over wanted individuals and signaling respect for state sovereignty, or it continues down a path of confrontation, an option that carries significant political and security costs.”

He noted that Hamas currently lacks the internal cohesion and public support to take a defiant stance. Internal divisions have grown between factions aligned with Iran and others favoring political reintegration within the broader Muslim Brotherhood framework.

Political analyst Dr. Qassem Qassir said Hamas’ leadership, based largely in Qatar, remains mindful of Lebanon’s fragile security. “Hamas doesn’t want to endanger Lebanon,” he said, adding that the group is likely to act cautiously given the broader regional context.

Meanwhile, Abbas’ visit is seen as an opportunity to reshape Palestinian-Lebanese relations and advance state authority in Palestinian camps. Lebanese officials are seeking a roadmap, backed by the Palestinian Authority, that could lead to the phased dismantling of weapons in refugee camps, following similar efforts targeting pro-Syrian Palestinian factions in the Bekaa and Naameh regions.

Hamas’ presence in Lebanon had traditionally been limited to social and political activities. But its military footprint began to emerge after a 2022 explosion in the Burj al-Shemali camp. Since the Gaza war erupted in October 2023, Hamas’s armed wing has become more active in southern Lebanon, coordinating with Hezbollah in launching attacks on Israel, further complicating its position with Lebanese authorities.