Tunisian Man Dies after Setting Himself Ablaze

Mohamed Bouazizi Square in Sidi Bouzid (AFP)
Mohamed Bouazizi Square in Sidi Bouzid (AFP)
TT
20

Tunisian Man Dies after Setting Himself Ablaze

Mohamed Bouazizi Square in Sidi Bouzid (AFP)
Mohamed Bouazizi Square in Sidi Bouzid (AFP)

A Tunisian man suffered died in hospital Saturday after setting himself on fire, witnesses and medics said, days after another burned himself alive to protest living conditions.

Both acts recall the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi, the street seller whose suicide by fire on December 17, 2010 launched Tunisia's revolution which in turn sparked the Arab Spring that toppled several autocratic leaders in the region.

On Saturday, a 35-year-old man "set himself on fire on Habib Bourguiba Avenue" in the center of Tunis, the civil defense told AFP.

The man, whose motives are still unknown, "suffered third degree burns and was rushed to hospital", a civil defense spokesman added.

Local media including state television later reported that he had died of his injuries.

A witness, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the man had arrived at the iconic avenue in central Tunis accompanied by a younger man and tried to attract the attention of some journalists who were present there.

The man then doused himself with flammable material which he set on fire with a lighter, the witness said.

Police set up barricades in the area, and an AFP reporter saw a pair of burned shoes behind them shortly after the incident.

Last week a young man wounded in the 2011 revolution burned himself alive after the government failed to provide compensation, his family said.

Neji Hefiane, 26, died in a hospital on the southern outskirts of Tunis on September 4 after having set himself alight in front of his family, his father said.

Hefiane suffered gunshot wounds to the head during anti-regime protests in the early days of the revolution, according to his family, and although he was on an official list of people entitled to government aid, he received no compensation.

"It was the injustice and marginalization he suffered that pushed my son to kill himself," his father, Bechir Hefiane, said on Monday.

He said he wrote to President Kais Saied explaining his son's case and asking him to intervene on behalf of the struggling family that lives in a working-class Tunis district.

"We've got no reply, even after my son's death," he added.



‘Greater Israel’ Remark Sparks Arab Anger

Palestinians survey damage from Israeli strike on Gaza’s Zeitoun district (AFP)
Palestinians survey damage from Israeli strike on Gaza’s Zeitoun district (AFP)
TT
20

‘Greater Israel’ Remark Sparks Arab Anger

Palestinians survey damage from Israeli strike on Gaza’s Zeitoun district (AFP)
Palestinians survey damage from Israeli strike on Gaza’s Zeitoun district (AFP)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s reference to being on a “historic and spiritual mission” tied to the vision of a “Greater Israel” has drawn anger across the Arab world and sparked sharp criticism on social media, with analysts saying it was aimed at rallying his domestic base.

Speaking to Israeli broadcaster i24, Netanyahu described the “Israeli dream” as a “mission of generations” passed down over time. “I feel I am on a spiritual and historic mission for the Jewish people,” he said, according to The Times of Israel.

During the interview, former right-wing lawmaker Sharon Gal presented Netanyahu with an amulet engraved with a map of “Greater Israel.” Joking about Netanyahu’s ongoing corruption trial, Gal said: “I’m not giving it to you, so you won’t get in trouble. It’s a gift for your wife, Sara.”

When asked whether he felt a connection with the “Greater Israel” vision, Netanyahu replied: “Very much.” The gift was not shown on screen, according to a clip Netanyahu posted on X.

The term “Greater Israel” has been used since Israel’s victory in the 1967 Six-Day War to describe Israel along with East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza, Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and Syria’s Golan Heights.

Asharq Al-Awsat sought official comment from Egypt but received no response.

Social media users warned of Israel’s expansionist ambitions, while Palestinian politician Mustafa Barghouti questioned Arab governments’ silence.

Egyptian media figure Nashaat al-Daihi called Netanyahu’s remarks “political suicide,” while Egyptian security expert Maj. Gen. Mohamed Abdel Wahed described them as “the boldest ever,” reflecting “a strategic ambition to reshape the Middle East and expand Israeli influence.”

The comments also stirred anger because of claims on social media that Egypt and Jordan were named as part of “Greater Israel” – although Netanyahu did not mention any countries in the interview.

Egyptian commentator Louay al-Khatib said Netanyahu’s extremism was “beyond dispute” but denied the prime minister had explicitly included Egypt.

Egyptian MP Mostafa Bakry called the remarks “dangerous” and a revelation of Israel’s “real plan to target the whole region.” Former Egyptian deputy foreign minister Rakha Ahmed Hassan said the statement was “serious and demands a serious response,” accusing Netanyahu of seeking to redraw the Middle East map “under an American umbrella.”

Netanyahu has previously signaled ambitions to reshape the region. At the UN General Assembly in September 2023, he held up a Middle East map that omitted the West Bank and Gaza. He repeated the gesture last year, calling one map “paradise” and the other “hell.”

Jordanian analyst Abdel Hakim al-Qarala said Netanyahu’s latest comments reflect “the true face of the Israeli far right” and are intended to appeal to those who believe in the “Greater Israel” dream. Egyptian strategist Khaled Okasha said Netanyahu aimed to frame the Gaza war as part of Israel’s founding mission, strengthening his standing both at home and with the United States.

The Arab League’s statement on Netanyahu’s comments called them a “blatant violation of the sovereignty of Arab states and an attempt to undermine security and stability in the region.”

The remarks, it added, “reflect expansionist and aggressive intentions that cannot be accepted or tolerated” and also “expose a mentality steeped in colonial delusions.”