Palestinian PM Calls on Hamas to Allow Local Elections

Palestinian fishermen in Gaza (AFP)
Palestinian fishermen in Gaza (AFP)
TT
20

Palestinian PM Calls on Hamas to Allow Local Elections

Palestinian fishermen in Gaza (AFP)
Palestinian fishermen in Gaza (AFP)

Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh called on Hamas to allow municipal elections to take place in the Gaza Strip, but the movement rejected his invitation, saying the elections are indivisible.

Speaking at the weekly cabinet meeting in Ramallah, Shtayyeh called on Hamas to allow the municipal elections on December 11 in their first phase, provided that the second phase is completed before the end of the first quarter of next year.

Earlier, the government issued a decision to hold local elections in two phases, the first on December 11 for Areas C in the West Bank, and the second phase in the first quarter of 2022 for Areas A and B.

The first phase is supposed to occur in 387 local authorities, while the second phase will occur in 90 major towns and cities.

Local elections are held every four years, but Hamas has prevented them in Gaza since it took control over the Strip in 2007.

Fatah won the majority during the last municipal elections in the West Bank in 2017-2018 after Hamas boycotted them.

The Executive Director of the Central Elections Commission, Hisham Kahil, said that holding local elections in Gaza requires political approval, noting that they are awaiting the cabinet's decision.

In 2017, the government held the elections in the West Bank only after it was unable to obtain Hamas' approval for Gaza.

The last elections held jointly between the West Bank and Gaza were in 2004 and 2005, over three phases. The Authority then announced that it wanted to hold elections in 2010 and 2011, which never happened. Elections were later held in 2012 and 2017 without the participation of Hamas.

Hamas reacted angrily to the government's announcement of the date of local elections, signaling that it would prevent the polls from taking place in Gaza.

Hamas official Mohammad Faraj al-Ghoul said that the elections are indivisible and that any vote must be part of national consensus.

Hamas believes that a unilateral step regarding the local elections and ignoring the national consensus, which necessitates holding the local, legislative, and presidential elections, is an attempt to circumvent the Palestinians' legitimate rights.

The movement warned that any step taken by the government without implementing what was agreed upon nationally is a failed attempt and “deepens the dictatorship.”

The legislative and presidential elections were supposed to occur in the Palestinian territories between May and July, but Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas canceled them after Israel banned them in Jerusalem.

Fatah, the government, and other factions are pressuring Hamas to allow elections in Gaza.

Member of the Palestine Liberation Front politburo Sufian Matar said Hamas obstructs the constitution by rejecting the polls.

Matar called on the movement to allow the elections to take place regardless of its participation.

Saleh Nasser, a member of the Democratic Front politburo, also called on Hamas to participate in the local elections and remove obstacles to holding them as a democratic and natural right for all.

Hamas is not expected to respond to the movement's calls, especially as it requests a precise date for the general elections, but the Authority did not heed the demand.

Local elections are politically significant because they can prove the factions' popular strength and dominance.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.