Ahmadinejad: ‘No War in the Region Will Have Any Winners’

Iran has no way but to have better relations with its neighbors to the south, Ahmadinejad says

Ahmadinejad: ‘No War in the Region Will Have Any Winners’
TT

Ahmadinejad: ‘No War in the Region Will Have Any Winners’

Ahmadinejad: ‘No War in the Region Will Have Any Winners’

US has helped install Taliban in Afghanistan which will lead to a resurgence of Al Qaeda, only to clash with Iran, but this plan will be foiled soon, Iran’s former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview with Camelia Entekhabifard, Independent Persian’s editor-in-chief.

“Taliban has been installed in violation of the demands of the nation of Afghanistan,” Ahmadinejad said.

Iran’s relations with its neighbors, particularly those to the south, will only improve in the coming years since there is no other way forward, the former president said.

Speaking of the threats posed by the terrorist group ISIS, he said: “ISIS is a direct client of Satan which seeks to create a religious war; this is a plan of global capitalism.”

Ahmadinejad insisted that he opposed the current Iranian policy toward Taliban and added: “I don’t like the word ‘opposition’ since I don’t want to create such a position. I am an Iranian and like all other Iranians, have the right to live and to speak my mind and express my opinion. Iran belongs to all 85 million Iranians. Just because someone sits on the top of the government, the country doesn’t belong to him. The country belongs to all and all can express their opinion. When you speak of ‘opposition,’ you divide up the country and it leads to people not listening to you, even if you speak the right words.”

“Iran, Saudi Arabia and, to a degree, Turkey have a key role in the region,” Ahmadinejad said. “If these three countries stand together, all the nations of the region will be in peace and there will be no conflict or clash. These are three large and important countries. When they have differences, all the relations in the region are ruined.”

Ahmadinejad added: “First, both Iran and Saudis have to believe that having differences hurts them both. Believe me, no one benefits from them clashing. Saddam attacked Iran and an eight-year war broke out. Did this war have a winner? No, it didn’t. Yes, Iran didn’t allow its territory to be taken away but Iran was standing there anyways. After eight years, we went back to point zero but with unrepairable losses.”

Clashes between countries in the region will only serve the enemies of nations and powers outside the region, Ahmadinejad said. He added: “Both countries should retreat a bit from their positions. We have to recognize each other and respect each other’s beliefs and identities. We have to accept the region is for everybody.”

“In these conditions, anyone who takes a step forward will become a historic hero for the nations of the region,” Iran’s former president said. “Why can’t Iran and Saudi Arabia solve the problem in Yemen? Why should countries from thousands of miles away come to solve this problem? Those who have no friendship with either side. Whenever clashes happen, they sell their arms. They don’t like a calm region with any strong country, whether that’s Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq or the United Arab Emirates.”

“Iran and Saudi Arabia should solve the Yemeni problem themselves,” Ahmadinejad said. “There is an easy formula: respecting the rights of the Yemeni nation. We should allow the Yemeni nation to choose for itself.”

“As in the past, whenever I think I can help solve problems in foreign policy, I’ll be happy to act,” the former president said. “I have described my plans in the past and wrote letters to a few people. Some welcomed them and some were hesitant.”

Speaking of his government, which ruled Iran from 2005 to 2013, Ahmadinejad said: “During my administration, there was an increase in per capita income and GDP. Look at the numbers and people’s conditions then. But many inside and outside the country united to frustrate us.”

Speaking of Iran’s nuclear program, Ahmadinejad said there was a solution to this problem even though the conflict over the program was serious.

“There is nothing positive in the current opposition between Iran and the United States,” Ahmadinejad said. “It’s bad for the US and it’s bad for Iran and many other countries. The world is a network and whenever a part of it is disrupted, the whole network is hurt.”

“The wise and elders in both countries should talk to each other and solve this problem,” Ahmadinejad said. “On a few questions, they should respect each other. They should recognize each other’s existence, independence and self-determination and refrain from intervening in each other’s affairs.”

“During my administration, we wrote to the US,” Ahmadinejad added. “I said: even if we the governments have problems with one another, why do you stop the people? Let people of both countries easily move back and forth. Iran and you are both taking a harsh attitude. Why? Allow people to interact with each other and this itself will solve the problem. One solution could be allowing mutual visa-free entry or issuing a few millions visas every year.”

“Right now, it’s not clear what the disagreements are on,” Iran’s former president said. “Is it Syria? There is a clear formula. Let’s agree with whatever the Syrian people asked for. Same with Yemen. Same with Iraq. Same with Afghanistan. I think this is what will ultimately happen because there is no other way out.”

Speaking of the possibility of an Israeli military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Ahmadinejad said: “Everything is possible but no war in the region will have a winner. The war will only lead to destruction in the region.”

“This question should be solved on a higher level. Is the US really worried about Iran’s nuclear program? US has 5,600 advanced fifth-generation atomic bombs. It has precision long-range missiles. From its bases in the Indian Ocean, it could target any point in our region.”

“I believe the nuclear program is a pretext,” Ahmadinejad said. “There are some differences and this has become an excuse to heighten them. We should resolve those differences.”

“Iran has faced some accusations,” the former president said. “But does Iran really need an atomic bomb? What would it do with it? The Zionist regime also has them. Of what use have they been to it?”

Ahmadinejad denied that the nuclear weapons could have a deterrent role. He said: “The atomic weapon belongs to a particular period of history. Human society has gone beyond it. Just like it went beyond archery. Now, human ideas are what counts.”

“Atomic energy is different from atomic weapons,” he added. “Everybody needs atomic energy.”

Insisting that the Iranian nuclear program was merely an excuse, Ahmadinejad said: “Before the nuclear program, why did Iran and US clash? The US backed Iraq in the war against us. It sanctioned us. Why? This question matters.”

“Today, India, Pakistan and the Zionist regime have an atomic bomb,” Iran’s former president said. “How come it’s okay for them? I have accurate information that few other countries in the region also possess atomic weapons. How come no one complains about them? Is it only bad if we have it? We have said we don’t want atomic weapons, anyways.”

He didn’t back up his claim about other countries in the region who allegedly possess nuclear weapons. Among the countries in the Middle East, only Israel is known to possess nuclear weapons.

“I say one more time: the age of atomic weapons has come to an end,” Ahmadinejad said. “Today, if people in the US are unhappy and if they rebel against their government, of what use is the atomic bomb? Think of the former Soviet Union. It had atomic weapons and yet it collapsed.”

“The US should accept that Iran is not the Iran of fifty years ago. The Iranian nation wants to stand on its own feet,” Ahmadinejad said. “This should be recognized and we shouldn’t interfere in each other’s internal affairs.”

“The main problem needs to be solved,” Ahmadinejad said. “All other issues are excuses. They call us terrorists. We also call them the same thing. We both have our own reasons. The US asks us why we interfere in the region but no country interferes in this region more than themselves. I am opposed to all such interference. But the US complains about us while it does more of it itself.”

“All countries have problems,” he added. “If we want to focus on each other’s problems, we’ll never solve them and everybody gets hurt.”

Ahmadinejad questioned Donald Trump’s honesty in his demand for direct and unconditional negotiations with Iran. He said: “It is the Islamic Republic that should champion negotiations and peace. But while severe sanctions are on us, how could we go to the negotiating table? One can’t negotiate from an unequal position. Sustainable understanding comes from equality.”

Ahmadinejad predicted that the world will not see another Cold War.

Speaking on the coronavirus outbreak, Ahmadinejad said: “Some were doing research and it got out of their hands. Then it was the turn of those who came with vaccines and medicine.”

Not clarifying which countries were doing the alleged ‘research,’ Ahmadinejad added: “Some with satanic qualities carry the coronavirus around and create chaos around the world. A day of accountability will come. The biological weapons are very advanced now but won’t bring peace.”

Ahmadinejad also spoke on the coming 50th anniversary of the foundation of the UAE and 44th anniversary of the Iranian revolution.

“A revolution is different from foundation of a country,” Ahmadinejad said. “Iran has existed for thousands of years but our system of administration has changed. But the UAE is a newly-founded country and the two countries can’t be compared based on history, culture or population.”

“Despite all this, we are neighbors and friends,” Iran’s former president said. “We have to stand with each other and jointly manage the region.”

Ahmadinejad, who was in the UAE to visit the Dubai Expo, said: “The UAE has seen vast and quick changes and has been successful in attracting businesses and investors. Dubai is now a business center based on economic planning. Abu Dhabi and Sharjah rely on oil income and Dubai is thus different from them.”

Ahmadinejad said UAE’s progress should be judged based on the country’s strategic and long-term goals and comparing its current achievements with its eventual goals.

Pointing out that Iran is different from the UAE in its material and human resources and geographical position, Ahmadinejad said: “Even if Iran does have long-term goals, this is only clear to a few and not all since it’s not transparent. And it’s not clear how we are to get there. People of Iran are suffering from this. I hope for the conditions to be reformed.”

“Iran has the capacity to quickly reach the level of countries in the region,” Ahmadinejad said.

Speaking of his trip, Ahmadinejad said he had come to see the Dubai Expo.

“The Dubai Expo is not a business event but aims at nations introducing their cultures and history to each other,” he added.

Ahmadinejad’s trip to Dubai took five days in total.



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.