GPCA Warns India against Harm of Protectionist Measures on MEG Imports from the GCC

GPCA Secretary General Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
GPCA Secretary General Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

GPCA Warns India against Harm of Protectionist Measures on MEG Imports from the GCC

GPCA Secretary General Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
GPCA Secretary General Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

India’s recent adoption of trade protectionist measures on mono ethylene glycol (MEG) imports from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia is damaging to its domestic market, the Gulf Petrochemicals and Chemicals Association (GPCA) has warned.

The comments come after India’s Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) initiated a new anti-dumping investigation into MEG imports from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the United States on June 28, 2021. The investigation – described by GPCA as “unjustified” and in breach of the rules laid by the World Trade Organization – was prompted by an application from two of India’s heavyweight chemical manufacturers.

The news alarmingly comes only a few months after India terminated another anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of MEG originating in or exported from Saudi Arabia (on April 6, 2020), Kuwait, Oman, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates (on November 20, 2020), after the application filed by one of the two companies was withdrawn following extensive diplomatic and political engagement.

GPCA has called for the immediate termination of the investigation in line with India’s obligations under the WTO Agreements, of which the country is a member.

The association further noted that since the establishment of the WTO in 1995, India has initiated 23 anti-dumping investigations and imposed seven anti-dumping measures against Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. This figure is more than four times the number of investigations initiated, and measures imposed by any other WTO member.

According to a report by India’s Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, India is net short of MEG with current demand of around 2.5 million metric tons (MT).

As this shortfall is expected to continue, GPCA warned India will need to import more MEG to satisfy domestic demand and ensure that prices are sustainable.

The continuous pursual of trade protectionist measures against countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which represent India’s largest chemicals import partner, could not only prove damaging to its domestic market, but also jeopardize exports, thereby creating a bottleneck.

“The new anti-dumping application is utterly unjustified as it is not based on valid legal and factual grounds. It also lacks evidence of MEG imports being dumped from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait,” said GPCA Secretary General Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun.

“The price at which MEG feedstock is imported from the two GCC states is based on market considerations and is in fact not different for MEG that is sold domestically or exported,” he added.

“Furthermore, there was no spike in MEG export volume from the two countries to India during the period of investigation (January 1, 2020 –December 31, 2020). Rather, there was a decline in comparison to the previous year.”

“To state that India’s MEG industry is suffering a material injury would be simply untrue. I can certify with confidence that from the research that GPCA has conducted and the facts on the ground, MEG imports from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia cannot have negatively impacted India’s domestic industry’s performance.”



Trump Hits Back with Tariffs of 125%, after China Raises Its Tariff on US Goods to 84%

A general view shows the Huangpu River and the financial district in Shanghai on April 9, 2025. (AFP)
A general view shows the Huangpu River and the financial district in Shanghai on April 9, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Trump Hits Back with Tariffs of 125%, after China Raises Its Tariff on US Goods to 84%

A general view shows the Huangpu River and the financial district in Shanghai on April 9, 2025. (AFP)
A general view shows the Huangpu River and the financial district in Shanghai on April 9, 2025. (AFP)

President Donald Trump on Wednesday raised tariffs on China to 125%, hours after China boosted taxes on American imports to 84% and vowed to "fight to the end" in an escalating battle that threatens to disrupt trade between the world's two largest economies.

The new rate levied by Beijing, which has taken effect, comes in response to Trump's earlier move to raise the tariff on Chinese products to 104% as part of increases that hit US trading partners worldwide. Europe and Canada also hit back Wednesday with new tariffs on imports from America.

Citing lack of respect, Trump responded by raising tariffs on China to 125%, while pausing tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

The hikes are the latest in an ongoing trade war that threatens to raise prices for consumers in America and derail China's attempts to reinvigorate its sluggish economy. The response from the Chinese government signals its determination not to bend to Trump's pressure, despite the risks.

"If the US insists on further escalating its economic and trade restrictions, China has the firm will and abundant means to take necessary countermeasures and fight to the end," the Ministry of Commerce said before announcing its latest tariff hike.

Beijing also imposed restrictions on doing business with nearly a dozen American companies and said it was launching a new challenge to the American tariffs at the World Trade Organization.

China is a major exporter to US but no longer No. 1  

The United States sent a record $199 billion in exports to China last year, while China exported $463 billion in goods and services to the United States, third behind Mexico and Canada, according to the US Commerce Department.

China was the top source of US imports as recently as 2022 but it has lost ground to America’s neighbors amid heightened tensions with the United States.

The European Chamber of Commerce in China accused the US of rolling back many of the principles that have underpinned its approach to trade and investment. It said that Trump's tariffs would have a significant impact on European companies exporting from China to the US, forcing them to rethink their business models and supply chains.

"This will lead to a substantial increase in operational costs and inefficiencies, and ultimately higher prices for consumers," it said.

No ‘easy path’ to restarting US-China trade talks

Though the US and China may want to find a way back to the negotiating table, "this won’t be an easy path to navigate with both countries doubling down and bilateral engagement at a virtual standstill," said former US trade official Wendy Cutler, a vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

China does not appear interested in bargaining, as some other countries have started doing.

"If the US truly wants to resolve issues through dialogue and negotiation, it should adopt an attitude of equality, respect and mutual benefit," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said.

The Chinese Ministry of Culture and Tourism issued a travel advisory asking its citizens to evaluate the risks of visiting the US as tourists and to exercise caution. The advisory, which came shortly after the announcement of the tariff hike, cited the deterioration in economic and trade relations as well as the "safety situation" in America.

China's response has gone from measured to tough 

Trump has now raised the tariff on Chinese goods five times since taking office in January. The first two hikes of 10% each were met with what analysts described as a measured response from China that left the door open for talks.

But after Trump announced an additional 34% tariff on Chinese goods last week, along with tariffs on other countries in his "Liberation Day," China matched that with a 34% tariff on imports from the US.

Trump then added a 50% tariff on goods from China, saying negotiations were terminated, and bringing the cumulative US tariff to 104%. China responded by raising the tariff on American products by the same amount, bringing its total rate to 84%.

China's latest measures include adding 11 American companies to an "unreliable entities" list that bars Chinese companies from selling them goods that could have military uses. Among the companies are American Photonics, and SYNEXXUS, which both work with the American military.

A Chinese position paper issued Wednesday said that the US has not honored the promises it made in an earlier "Phase One" trade deal concluded during Trump’s first term. As an example, it said a US law that would ban TikTok unless it is sold by its Chinese parent company violates a promise that neither would "pressure the other party to transfer technology to its own individuals."

Trump signed an order to keep TikTok running for another 75 days last week after a potential deal to sell the app to American owners was put on ice. Representatives from ByteDance, the parent company, told the White House that the Chinese government would no longer approve a deal until there could be talks on trade.

"History and facts have proven that the United States’ increase in tariffs will not solve its own problems," the Commerce Ministry said in a statement introducing the paper. "Instead, it will trigger sharp fluctuations in financial markets, push up US inflation pressure, weaken the US industrial base and increase the risk of a US economic recession, which will ultimately only backfire on itself."