Iranian Oil Shipment to Lebanon: A Hezbollah Ploy that Stumbled at First Hurdle

Tankers carrying Iranian fuel arrive from Syria at al-Ain in Hermel in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley on September 16, 2021. (AFP)
Tankers carrying Iranian fuel arrive from Syria at al-Ain in Hermel in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley on September 16, 2021. (AFP)
TT

Iranian Oil Shipment to Lebanon: A Hezbollah Ploy that Stumbled at First Hurdle

Tankers carrying Iranian fuel arrive from Syria at al-Ain in Hermel in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley on September 16, 2021. (AFP)
Tankers carrying Iranian fuel arrive from Syria at al-Ain in Hermel in east Lebanon's Bekaa Valley on September 16, 2021. (AFP)

A few months after Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah vowed to bring in Iranian oil shipments to Lebanon, it turned out that the pledge was nothing more than a PR stunt by the party.

Nasrallah spoke of four shipments that Iran will send to Lebanon, but only one has arrived and it is probably the last. Nasrallah pledged that the shipments would resolve the fuel crisis in Lebanon, and yet it still persists and the cost of fuel and gasoline is skyrocketing.

Rather than resolving the crisis, the shipment has become a source of income for the party, which has hiked its cost 100 percent after the state lifted fuel subsidies. Obviously, the party does not pay customs fees or taxes to the state for the shipment because it is not being brought in through official channels.

Moreover, complaints have been made about the quality of the Iranian fuel oil, known as mazout, that is suitable for use at bakeries, not for electricity generators.

Ahmed, a resident of the Hezbollah stronghold of Dahieh in Beirut’s southern suburbs, said the Iranian mazout was not suitable for the generator used at his apartment building.

In fact, the mazout led to the generator’s malfunction that cost 200 dollars to repair, he complained.

This has prompted other locals to hesitate in purchasing the mazout and raised questions about its quality, since it is not subject to necessary tests to check if it meets the required standards.

More complaints were made after it was realized that the Iranian mazout is of the red diesel kind, not green diesel. Lebanon stopped importing red diesel in 2018 and shifted to the green variety in a move that was seen as win for environmentalists because red diesel is more polluting.

Former official at the energy ministry Ghassan Baydoun told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Iranian oil is not subject to tests and in all likelihood, the Iranians are sending poor quality diesel to Lebanon.

Explaining the difference between red and green diesel, he said the first has an advantage in that it takes longer to burn, but it produces heavy smoke, a foul smell and is bad for the environment.

Mustaqbal movement MP and member of the parliamentary public works, transportation, energy and water committee, Samir al-Jisr told Asharq Al-Awsat that since Iranian oil is not being tested, its negative impact on the environment cannot be assessed.

“The more important point is that we have reached this stage because the previous government failed in providing solutions to the fuel and mazout shortages,” he added.

Over the summer, Lebanon endured a severe fuel shortage that impacted all aspects of life and all sectors, especially hospitals and bakeries. It has also led to ongoing power cuts, which last more than 20 hours a day, because the official state electricity company is unable to secure fuel.

Jisr added: “Iran is not a charity, it thinks of its interests above all else. The Iranians will stop sending Hezbollah mazout once Lebanon begins securing it.”



Win the Vote but Still Lose? Behold America’s Electoral College

Voters head into a polling location to cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the 2024 election on November 1, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Getty Images/AFP)
Voters head into a polling location to cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the 2024 election on November 1, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Win the Vote but Still Lose? Behold America’s Electoral College

Voters head into a polling location to cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the 2024 election on November 1, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Getty Images/AFP)
Voters head into a polling location to cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the 2024 election on November 1, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Getty Images/AFP)

When political outsider Donald Trump defied polls and expectations to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election, he described the victory as "beautiful."

Not everyone saw it that way -- considering that Democrat Clinton had received nearly three million more votes nationally than her Republican rival. Non-Americans were particularly perplexed that the second-highest vote-getter would be the one crowned president.

But Trump had done what the US system requires: win enough individual states, sometimes by very narrow margins, to surpass the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win the White House.

Now, on the eve of the 2024 election showdown between Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris, the rules of this enigmatic and, to some, outmoded, system is coming back into focus.

- Why an Electoral College? -

The 538 members of the US Electoral College gather in their state's respective capitals after the quadrennial presidential election to designate the winner.

A presidential candidate must obtain an absolute majority of the "electors" -- or 270 of the 538 -- to win.

The system originated with the US Constitution in 1787, establishing the rules for indirect, single-round presidential elections.

The country's Founding Fathers saw the system as a compromise between direct presidential elections with universal suffrage, and an election by members of Congress -- an approach rejected as insufficiently democratic.

Because many states predictably lean Republican or Democratic, presidential candidates focus heavily on the handful of "swing" states on which the election will likely turn -- nearly ignoring some large states such as left-leaning California and right-leaning Texas.

Over the years, hundreds of amendments have been proposed to Congress in efforts to modify or abolish the Electoral College. None has succeeded.

Trump's 2016 victory rekindled the debate. And if the 2024 race is the nail-biter that most polls predict, the Electoral College will surely return to the spotlight.

- Who are the 538 electors? -

Most are local elected officials or party leaders, but their names do not appear on ballots.

Each state has as many electors as it has members in the US House of Representatives (a number dependent on the state's population), plus the Senate (two in every state, regardless of size).

California, for example, has 54 electors; Texas has 40; and sparsely populated Alaska, Delaware, Vermont and Wyoming have only three each.

The US capital city, Washington, also gets three electors, despite having no voting members in Congress.

The Constitution leaves it to states to decide how their electors' votes should be cast. In every state but two (Nebraska and Maine, which award some electors by congressional district), the candidate winning the most votes theoretically is allotted all that state's electors.

- Controversial institution -

In November 2016, Trump won 306 electoral votes, well more than the 270 needed.

The extraordinary situation of losing the popular vote but winning the White House was not unprecedented.

Five presidents have risen to the office this way, the first being John Quincy Adams in 1824.

More recently, the 2000 election resulted in an epic Florida entanglement between Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore.

Gore won nearly 500,000 more votes nationwide, but when Florida -- ultimately following a US Supreme Court intervention -- was awarded to Bush, it pushed his Electoral College total to 271 and a hair's-breadth victory.

- True vote or simple formality? -

Nothing in the Constitution obliges electors to vote one way or another.

If some states required them to respect the popular vote and they failed to do so, they were subjected to a simple fine. But in July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that states could impose punishments on such "faithless electors."

To date, faithless electors have never determined a US election outcome.

- Electoral College schedule -

Electors will gather in their state capitals on December 17 and cast votes for president and vice president. US law states they "meet and cast their vote on the first Tuesday after the second Wednesday in December."

On January 6, 2025, Congress will convene to certify the winner -- a nervously watched event this cycle, four years after a mob of Trump supporters attacked the US Capitol attempting to block certification.

But there is a difference. Last time, it was Republican vice president Mike Pence who, as president of the Senate, was responsible for overseeing the certification. Defying heavy pressure from Trump and the mob, he certified Biden's victory.

This time, the president of the Senate -- overseeing what normally would be the pro forma certification -- will be none other than today's vice president: Kamala Harris.

On January 20, the new president is to be sworn in.