Russia Surprises US with Deploying Missile System in Syria

“S-300” long-range air-defense system at al-Tabqah airbase (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)
“S-300” long-range air-defense system at al-Tabqah airbase (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)
TT
20

Russia Surprises US with Deploying Missile System in Syria

“S-300” long-range air-defense system at al-Tabqah airbase (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)
“S-300” long-range air-defense system at al-Tabqah airbase (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights)

Russian forces have deployed a long-range air-defense system (S-300) in al-Tabqah airbase in Syria’s northeastern Raqqa governorate, where US forces were deployed after expelling ISIS, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported.

By the end of 2018, Russia had deployed its S-300 system in Syria’s Deir Ezzor, which is under the control of the Syria regime. This took place at a time when the areas east of the Euphrates were in the hands of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces.

However, spheres of military influence shifted after former US President Donald Trump having allowed the Turkish army to jump in between Tal Abyad and Ras al-Ain, opening doors to Russian, Turkish and Syrian forces to the east of the Euphrates River.

Also, this allowed for the spread of Iranian militias in the countryside of Deir Ezzor on the second bank of the river.

The Observatory said that al-Tabqah base “is currently considered a military base and an important location for Russia in the countryside of Raqqa.”

According to the UK-based war monitor, the Russian army has deployed advanced S-300 and S-400 advanced missile systems in various areas in western Syria.

According to military experts, the S-300 system allows Russia to monitor military movements in northeastern Syria.

At the moment, northeast Syria is witnessing drone attacks by Turkey against Kurdish forces, Israeli bombing of Iranian militia sites, and Iranian militia attacks against US military assets east of the Euphrates and at Al-Tanf base.



Syria’s Reconciliation Committee Prioritizes Stability after Anger Over Prisoner Releases

Member of the High Committee for National Reconciliation Hassan Soufan and the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Facebook)
Member of the High Committee for National Reconciliation Hassan Soufan and the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Facebook)
TT
20

Syria’s Reconciliation Committee Prioritizes Stability after Anger Over Prisoner Releases

Member of the High Committee for National Reconciliation Hassan Soufan and the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Facebook)
Member of the High Committee for National Reconciliation Hassan Soufan and the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Facebook)

Syria’s High Committee for National Reconciliation has defended recent controversial prisoner releases, saying the decision aims to preserve national stability amid ongoing tensions.

Committee member Hassan Soufan confirmed that several officers recently freed had voluntarily surrendered in 2021 at the Iraqi border and in the Al-Sukhna region, under a formal request for safe conduct.

Speaking at a press conference in Damascus on Tuesday, Soufan addressed public backlash following the releases and acknowledged the deep pain felt by victims’ families.

“We fully understand the anger and grief of the families of martyrs,” he said. “But the current phase requires decisions that can help secure relative stability for the coming period.”

The controversy erupted after the Ministry of Interior announced on Sunday the release of dozens of detainees in Latakia, many of whom were arrested during the “Deterrence of Aggression” operation, which contributed to the fall of the Assad regime.

Among those involved in the mediation effort was Fadi Saqr, a former commander in the regime’s National Defense Forces, who has been accused of war crimes, including involvement in the Tadamon massacre in southern Damascus.

Soufan explained that the released officers had undergone investigation and were found not to have participated in war crimes. “Keeping them imprisoned no longer serves a national interest,” he said. “It has no legal justification.”

He stressed that Syria is in a delicate phase of national reconciliation, in which balancing justice and peace is critical.

“There are two parallel tracks - transitional justice and civil peace - and today, the priority is civil peace, as it lays the groundwork for all other strategic efforts,” he said.

Soufan added that the committee has requested expanded powers from the Syrian president, including the authority to release detainees not proven guilty and to coordinate directly with state institutions.

He insisted that the aim is not to bypass justice, but to prevent further bloodshed. “Vengeance and retribution are not paths to justice,” he said. “They allow real criminals to slip away while deepening divisions.”

While affirming that transitional justice remains essential, Soufan noted that it should focus on top perpetrators of atrocities, not individuals who merely served under the regime. “Justice means accountability for those who planned and carried out major crimes, not blanket punishment.”