England Tree Scheme Takes Root amid Climate Emergency

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government wants to plant 30 million new trees per year from 2025 under UK plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050 ADRIAN DENNIS AFP
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government wants to plant 30 million new trees per year from 2025 under UK plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050 ADRIAN DENNIS AFP
TT
20

England Tree Scheme Takes Root amid Climate Emergency

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government wants to plant 30 million new trees per year from 2025 under UK plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050 ADRIAN DENNIS AFP
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government wants to plant 30 million new trees per year from 2025 under UK plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050 ADRIAN DENNIS AFP

Hunched over and heads down in concentration, three workers at Moor Trees, a nursery in southwestern England, shell red seed pods and toss them one by one into a bucket.

The seeds are placed in pots and covered in soil, and those which germinate over the next two years will then be planted in the ground and hopefully grow into full-grown trees, AFP reported.

With the ominous threat of the climate emergency, tree planting has become a fashionable choice for governments and companies looking to capture polluting carbon dioxide emissions or reduce carbon footprints.

The crisis hit the headlines last month when major powers agreed at the COP26 climate summit in Scotland to end deforestation and curb the use of high-polluting fossil fuels.

'Massive public interest'
"There's a massive public interest in tree planting," Moor Trees director Adam Owen told AFP, speaking alongside rows of sapling trees that are covered in green mesh to protect them from squirrels and other pests.

The charity, based in the city of Totnes in Devon, works alongside landowners to create new hedgerows and woodlands following years of historical UK under-investment.

And demand is booming so much that Owen has not had to seek a single new client since 2018.

"We expanded quite significantly -- a few years ago we were doing about 6,000 trees (per year) and now we're doing 15,000 trees.

"Our aspiration is 25,000 in a few years' time.

"In three years, I have not had to ask a single person whether we could plant for them."

Demand is thriving from companies, governments and individuals across the globe.

Eden Project, a US reforestation charity operating in nine countries, saw its budget surge from $5 million in 2019 to $26 million this year, while it targets $120 million by 2023.

Back in Britain, just 13 percent of UK territory is covered in forest or woodland. That compares poorly with the EU average of 39 percent, according to Eurostat data.

30 million trees per year
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government wants to plant 30 million new trees per year from 2025 under UK plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050.

However, recent official data showed there is some way to go after just 4.2 million trees were planted in 2020/2021.

At the same time, land is in short supply because much of it is already built upon -- or includes protected habitats like peat marshes.

Seeds are also scarce and often have to be imported, particularly from the Netherlands, but this runs the risk of importing dangerous bacteria.

Moor Trees in contrast uses local tree varieties that are used to the soil conditions.

Growing trees is a complex process that is very time consuming and cannot be regarded a quick fix for the climate crisis, experts say.

Plea to slash emissions
New trees cannot be a substitute for badly-needed global reductions in dangerous polluting emissions that worsen climate change.

"The most important thing we have to do is slash our emissions," said Luke Barley, woodlands specialist at Britain's National Trust that manages historic properties and countryside.

"But there's still too much carbon in the atmosphere -- that's where trees can play a significant role" in absorbing carbon.

Businesses, individuals and governments alike still need to alter their approach and refrain from so-called greenwashing, he argued.

"It's not appropriate for any organization to continue business as usual and offset their emissions through tree planting," he concluded.

Large commercial companies must invest to complement the efforts of small-scale players like Moor Trees.

Yet trees alone cannot resolve the ongoing climate crisis.

"Tree planting is not the solution -- it's just one of the solutions," noted Owen.



Grievances and Forgiveness Were Both on Display in Prince Harry’s Raw TV Interview

Britain's Prince Harry departs after attending court for his appeal against the rejection of his legal challenge to the British government's decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, outside the High Court in London, Britain, April 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Britain's Prince Harry departs after attending court for his appeal against the rejection of his legal challenge to the British government's decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, outside the High Court in London, Britain, April 9, 2025. (Reuters)
TT
20

Grievances and Forgiveness Were Both on Display in Prince Harry’s Raw TV Interview

Britain's Prince Harry departs after attending court for his appeal against the rejection of his legal challenge to the British government's decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, outside the High Court in London, Britain, April 9, 2025. (Reuters)
Britain's Prince Harry departs after attending court for his appeal against the rejection of his legal challenge to the British government's decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, outside the High Court in London, Britain, April 9, 2025. (Reuters)

The rift between Prince Harry and his family has burst into the open again with the prince’s raw television interview after losing a court case over his security.

In a long and at times emotional conversation, the 40-year-old prince said he wants reconciliation, while re-airing grievances against the royal family, the UK government and the media.

Here are key takeaways from Friday’s BBC interview:

A security feud has deepened the royal rift Harry said his father, King Charles III, won’t speak to him because of “this security stuff” – a legal wrangle over protection for the prince when he is in Britain.

“This, at the heart of it, is a family dispute,” he said.

Harry has been estranged from his family since he and his wife Meghan quit royal duties in 2020 and moved to the United States, alleging hostility and racist attitudes by the press and royal establishment. Harry’s tell-all 2023 memoir “Spare,” stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations, made things worse.

But Harry said what’s souring the relationship now is a decision to remove his police protection detail after he stopped being a working royal. On Friday the Court of Appeal in London rejected Harry’s bid to restore the protection, saying a government committee was justified in deciding that security should be assessed on a case-by-case basis whenever Harry visits the UK.

Harry blamed the palace, alleging that the decision to withdraw his security had been made at the direction of royal officials, who sit on the committee alongside police and government representatives. He said they were “knowingly putting me and my family in harm’s way,” hoping that the sense of threat “would force us to come back.”

He suggested his father was part of the problem, saying he’d asked the king “to step out of the way and let the experts do their job.”

Harry highlighted health concerns about the king King Charles, 76, has been treated for an undisclosed cancer for more than a year. Buckingham Palace has given infrequent updates, and has not disclosed what form of cancer the king has.

Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said “I don’t know how much longer my father has.”

He held out little hope of another meeting soon.

“The only time I come back to the UK, is, sadly, for funerals or court cases,” he said.

After taking several months off last year, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. This week he told a reception for cancer charities that being diagnosed was “a daunting and at times frightening experience.” He added: “I can vouch for the fact that it can also be an experience that brings into sharp focus the very best of humanity.”

Harry fears for his life and safety Harry has well-founded concerns for the safety of himself and his family.

He is fifth in line to the throne, behind his brother William and William’s three children. He spent 10 years in the British army, serving two tours of duty in Afghanistan.

Harry said that before 2020 he was placed in the highest tier of at-risk royals, alongside his late grandmother Queen Elizabeth II.

Since then, he has been stripped of taxpayer-funded police protection, and also denied permission to pay for it himself, leaving private security his only option.

He said that is not as good as police protection, which is provided for life to “people who leave public office,” such as former prime ministers.

“I can never leave the royal family,” he said. “I was born into those risks, and they've only increased over time.”

He claimed that “some people want history to repeat itself,” an apparent reference to the death of his mother Princess Diana. She was killed in a car crash in Paris in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi.

He worries his children will lose part of their heritage Harry, Meghan and their children Archie, 5, and 3-year-old Lilibet, currently live in California, and Harry said he “can’t see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK.”

The prince said he loves Britain and “it’s really quite sad that I won’t be able to show my children my homeland.”

Harry claimed that he and his family are endangered when visiting Britain because of hostility aimed at him and Meghan on social media and through relentless hounding by news media.

Harry wants reconciliation with his family – but it may not be imminent Harry’s explosive memoir “Spare” scattered bitterness and blame at Charles, Queen Camilla – Harry’s stepmother – and his elder brother William.

In the interview, he said he could forgive his family, and even the British press that he reviles and has repeatedly sued.

“I would love reconciliation with my family. There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore,” Harry said.

Historian Anthony Seldon said Harry had chosen his words deliberately to signal he “wants to make a new start.”

“There will be no more spiteful books,” Seldon told Sky News. “He has signaled he wants to be back in a way that needs to be worked out.”

But Joe Little, managing editor of Majesty Magazine, said it's hard to see how reconciliation can happen.

“He clearly feels aggrieved at the outcome of this legal action, but there is a great deal to be gained by maintaining a dignified silence,” Little said. “Sadly, as we know from past events, this isn’t Harry’s way of doing things.”