Washington Committed to Constitutional Declaration to Resolve Sudan Crisis

US Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman. (Reuters)
US Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman. (Reuters)
TT

Washington Committed to Constitutional Declaration to Resolve Sudan Crisis

US Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman. (Reuters)
US Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman. (Reuters)

The United States still supports the civilian demonstrations in Sudan and the people's right to determine their fate.

The "2019 constitutional declaration is the best way forward because it espouses the democratic aspirations of the Sudanese people," said State Department spokesman Ned Price during a press briefing.

Reports have spoken of disputes within Joe Biden's administration over the position on Sudan that may lead US Horn of Africa envoy Jeffrey Feltman to resign.

Price stressed that Washington rejects the use of violence against Sudanese protesters.

"Sudanese stakeholders will need to set aside differences and agree on a consensual way forward to advance the country’s democratic transition under civilian leadership, consistent with the 2019 constitutional declaration and the aspirations of the Sudanese people," he urged.

"The Troika and the EU will continue to support the democratic transition in Sudan. But Sudanese stakeholders will need to work on the basis of the 2019 constitutional declaration on how to overcome the nation’s current political crisis, select new civilian leadership, and identify clear timelines and processes for the remaining transitional tasks. And that includes establishing the legislative and judicial branches of government, creating accountability mechanisms, and laying the groundwork for elections," Price continued.

"The actions of the military in recent weeks and the past couple months have been deeply concerning and we have condemned them, but we continue to look to that document as a blueprint for the path forward," he remarked.

"The next prime minister needs to enjoy credibility with the Sudanese people, and that can only occur if the individual is identified through a consultative civilian-led process consistent with that very 2019 constitutional declaration," he stressed.

Observers said that internal differences may bubble to the surface within the American administration over the developments in Sudan. The differences center on how to describe the political crisis that erupted in October when the military seized power.

One camp in the administration refuses to describe the events as a "military coup", but would rather call it military seizure.

The State Department is also divided between a camp that backs imposing sanctions on the military leaderships behind the coup and attacks against protesters.

In November, Foreign Policy spoke of fundamental differences within the State Department over the "military coup". One camp, led by Feltman, firmly supports slapping sanctions on military officials and holding them accountable for obstructing the democratic process in the country.

Moreover, he even accused them of lying to him shortly after meeting them when signs of a dispute between the military and civilian authorities began to emerge in October.

The second camp, led by Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee, urges patience and against rushing to slap sanctions on a country that has just started to embark on its democratic path after ousting the Bashir regime in 2019. The camp advocates having all sides overcoming their problems and working together to end the crisis.

Phee had visited Khartoum in November 16 where she met with head of the military commander Abdul Fattah al-Burhan and Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, who resigned from his post this week.

Confirming the differences within the State Department, Reuters reported exclusively on Wednesday that Feltman intends to step down from his post this month after more than nine months in the job.

David Satterfield, the outgoing US ambassador to Turkey, will take up the role, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

Feltman, a veteran US diplomat, assumed the post in April and quickly found himself in the middle of two major crises - Ethiopia's deepening civil war between forces loyal to the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) and the army of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, as well as a military coup in Sudan in October.

The news of his departure, which was not previously reported, came before he heads to Ethiopia on Thursday to meet with senior government officials about the peace talks as part of Washington's latest push to bring an end to the conflict.

Asharq Al-Awsat tried to contact the State Department for a comment, but received no reply. It then contacted diplomatic sources in Washington that confirmed the differences within the State Department.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the sources did not confirm reports of Feltman's resignation.



Ex-Tunisian Minister Sentenced to Three Years in Prison

Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Ex-Tunisian Minister Sentenced to Three Years in Prison

Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Criminal Chamber specialized in financial corruption cases at the Court of First Instance of Tunis, sentenced on Friday former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher to three years in prison, the Tunisian official news agency, TAP, reported.
The ruling is part of a corruption case related to breaches in a transaction carried out by the former minister for the purchase of several vehicles.
Investigation showed that the tender conditions were allegedly manipulated in favor of one particulate supplier.
In addition to Mouakher, the Chamber condemned a civil protection executive, seconded to the Environment Ministry, to two years in prison.
The two defendants are found guilty of abusing their functions to obtain an undue advantage, and therefore causing harm to the administration and contravening the regulations in force.
On Thursday, the Criminal Chamber specialized in corruption cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance sentenced a security officer to three years in prison and four others to four years in prison on charges of abusing their functions to obtain an undue advantage and harm others.
The five security officers had formed a group for the purpose of attacking property and exploiting a public employee.
According to documents related to the case, surveillance activities revealed that the five defendants, who work at a central department, were involved in seizing private funds, giving night jobs to some department agents, and transferring the profits to their personal accounts.
Their case was first examined by the Financial Chamber, which decided to sentence the five security guards to prison.
The case was later referred to the Criminal Chamber that examines financial corruption cases. The chamber had earlier kept the five defendants at liberty, before issuing late on Thursday the prison sentences.