Addis Ababa, Khartoum Reach Deal on Border Dispute

 Head of Sudan's Sovereign Transitional Council General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed during the signing of the “power-sharing” agreement in Khartoum in August 2019.  (Reuters)
Head of Sudan's Sovereign Transitional Council General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed during the signing of the “power-sharing” agreement in Khartoum in August 2019. (Reuters)
TT

Addis Ababa, Khartoum Reach Deal on Border Dispute

 Head of Sudan's Sovereign Transitional Council General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed during the signing of the “power-sharing” agreement in Khartoum in August 2019.  (Reuters)
Head of Sudan's Sovereign Transitional Council General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed during the signing of the “power-sharing” agreement in Khartoum in August 2019. (Reuters)

Ethiopia’s ambassador to Khartoum Yibeltal Aemero Alemu said Sudan and Ethiopia reached an agreement to peacefully resolve the border dispute.

Alemu did not specify when bilateral talks on border demarcation would be launched.

“There are previous border agreements with Sudan,” he affirmed, adding that officials from both countries will refer to these agreements to demarcate the land borders and resolve the dispute.

Commenting on the current situation in Sudan, Alemu stressed that Ethiopia does not interfere in other countries’ affairs and is not biased to any party.

But he said his country is willing to mediate to bridge the rifts among the conflicting Sudanese parties upon their request.

Meanwhile, Addis Ababa announced moving forward with planning the third filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), with our without an agreement with the Nile Basin countries.

It said it is ready to start negotiations on filling and operating the dam once it receives an invitation from the African Union.

Alemu reiterated his country’s position based on the Declaration of Principles signed in 2015 in Khartoum, noting that it gives Addis Ababa the right to carry on the construction process and fill the dam’s lake in line with talks.

The last round of talks between Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia in Kinshasa ended in early April 2021 with no progress made. Ethiopia refused then to involve the quartet in GERD talks and renewed its commitment to the AU-led talks.

The Ethiopian diplomat pledged to abide by the agreements with Sudan by providing it with electricity at reduced prices, based on the common interests between the two countries.

“This is one of the benefits the mega-dam provides to Sudan,” Alemu said, stressing that Addis Ababa has always stated that the dam will allow the downstream countries to rise and develop together.

Egypt and 10 other downstream countries share the Nile basin, yet more than 85 percent of its share comes from the Blue Nile tributary in Ethiopia.

For nearly a decade, the African Union-sponsored talks between Cairo, Addis Ababa and Khartoum over its operation and filling have faltered

Cairo and Khartoum demand that the three countries reach a legally binding agreement to fill and operate the dam.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”