Goldrich Reaffirms US Commitment to Accountability in Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich (US Department of State)
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich (US Department of State)
TT

Goldrich Reaffirms US Commitment to Accountability in Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich (US Department of State)
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich (US Department of State)

Ethan Goldrich, the US deputy assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs, with responsibility for the Levant and Syria engagement, reaffirmed that the US position on normalizing ties with the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad has not changed.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Goldrich called for focusing on holding the regime accountable for the horrors it committed. He highlighted the importance of UN Security Council resolution 2254 in guaranteeing the future stability of Syria.

He said the US has not and will not support any effort to normalize relations with the regime or rehabilitate it, adding that US sanctions against it are still in place.

Washington continues to impose new, targeted sanctions on the regime to demonstrate its commitment to human rights and the Caesar Act, Goldrich told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The official urged all states, especially those considering the association with the Assad regime, to pay close attention to the atrocities committed against the Syrian people over the past decade, including chemical weapons attacks and the forced disappearance and imprisonment of more than 100,000 men, women, and children.

He urged a continued focus on accountability.

When it comes to finding a political solution for the Syrian people, after more than a decade of war, the Assad regime has undoubtedly been the biggest obstacle to progress on that path, noted the official.

Affirming that the US remains firmly committed to finding a political solution for the conflict in Syria, Goldrich said that Washington believes that the process outlined in Security Council Resolution 2254 remains the most viable path to ensuring future stability in Syria.

He said the US strongly supports the efforts of UN Special Envoy Geir Pedersen to bring Syrians together.

The US will continue to work with the UN, its allies, the Syrian opposition, and its international partners to ensure Syria’s stability in the future, Goldrich pledged.

Regarding Lebanon, Goldrich said that the situation there calls for “concern,” pointing out to helping the Lebanese people in a way that fits US law.

The US official also noted that Iranian presence destabilizes Syria and Lebanon and that the Lebanon-based Hezbollah terror group works to embolden Tehran’s malign agenda.

Goldrich had just concluded a tour that saw him visiting several countries in the region to promote a collaborative approach to resolving the Syrian conflict and encourage creative ways to implement UNSC resolution 2254.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.