Russia Flexes Military for Ukraine Move; West to Respond

Russian President Vladimir Putin signs a document recognizing the independence of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Feb. 21, 2022.
Russian President Vladimir Putin signs a document recognizing the independence of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Feb. 21, 2022.
TT

Russia Flexes Military for Ukraine Move; West to Respond

Russian President Vladimir Putin signs a document recognizing the independence of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Feb. 21, 2022.
Russian President Vladimir Putin signs a document recognizing the independence of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Monday, Feb. 21, 2022.

Russia set the stage for a quick move to secure its hold on Ukraine's rebel regions on Tuesday with new legislation that would allow the deployment of troops there as the West prepares to announce sanctions against Moscow amid fears of a full-scale invasion.

The new Russia bills, which are likely to be quickly rubber-stamped by the Kremlin-controlled parliament, came a day after President Vladimir Putin recognized the independence of the regions in eastern Ukraine. The legislation could be a pretext for a deeper move into Ukrainian territory as the US and its allies have feared.

Quickly after Putin signed the decree late Monday, convoys of armored vehicles were seen rolling across the separatist-controlled territories. It wasn’t immediately clear if they were Russian.

Russian officials haven't yet acknowledged any troop deployments to the rebel east, but Vladislav Brig, a member of the separatist local council in Donetsk, told reporters that the Russian troops already had moved in, taking up positions in the region's north and west.

Putin’s decision to recognize the rebel regions as independent states follows a nearly eight-year old separatist conflict that has killed more than 14,000 and devastated Ukraine’s eastern industrial heartland called Donbas. The latest developments and move by Putin were met with reprehension by many countries around the world.

Ever since the conflict erupted weeks after Russia’s 2014 annexation of the Ukrainian Crimean Peninsula, Ukraine and its Western allies have accused Moscow of backing the separatists with troops and weapons, the charges it has denied, saying that Russians who fought in the east were volunteers. Putin’s move Monday formalizes Russia’s hold on the regions and gives it a free hand to deploy its forces there.

Draft bills that are set quickly sail through both houses of Russian parliament Tuesday, envisage military ties, including possible deployment of Russian military bases in the separatist regions.

Several senior lawmakers suggested Tuesday that Russia could recognize the rebel-held territories in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine in their original administrative borders, including the chunks of land currently under the Ukrainian control.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sought to project calm, telling the country in an address overnight: “We are not afraid of anyone or anything. We don’t owe anyone anything. And we won’t give anything to anyone.” His foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba, would be in Washington on Tuesday to meet with Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the State Department said.

“The Kremlin recognized its own aggression against Ukraine,” Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov said on Twitter, describing Moscow’s move as a “New Berlin Wall” and urging the West to quickly slap Russia with sanctions.

The White House responded quickly, issuing an executive order to prohibit US investment and trade in the separatist regions, and additional measures — likely sanctions — were to be announced Tuesday. Those sanctions are independent of what Washington has prepared in the event of a Russian invasion, according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity.

Other Western allies also said they were planning to announce sanctions.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Tuesday the UK will also introduce “immediate” economic sanctions against Russia, and warned that Putin is bent on “a full-scale invasion of Ukraine ... that would be absolutely catastrophic."

Johnson said Putin had “completely torn up international law” and British sanctions would target not just the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk but “Russian economic interests as hard as we can.”

EU foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, said that “Russian troops have entered in Donbas,” adding that “I wouldn’t say that (it is) a fully-fledged invasion, but Russian troops are on Ukrainian soil” and the EU would decide on sanctions later on Tuesday.

Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Błaszczak also said in a radio interview Tuesday he could confirm that Russian forces entered the territories, describing it as a violation of Ukraine’s borders and international law.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin on Tuesday said China would “continue to stay in engagement with all parties,” continuing to steer clear from committing to back Russia despite the close ties between Moscow and Beijing.

While Ukraine and the West said the Russian recognition of the rebel regions shatters a 2015 peace deal, Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, Vassily Nebenzia, challenged that, noting that Moscow isn't a party to the Minsk agreement and arguing that it could still be implemented if Ukraine chooses so.

The 2015 deal that was brokered by France and Germany and signed in Minsk, the Belarusian capital, required Ukraine to offer a sweeping self-rule to the rebel regions in a diplomatic coup for Russia after a series of Ukrainian military defeats.

Many in Ukraine resented the deal as a betrayal of national interests and a blow to the country's integrity, and its implementation has stalled.

Putin announced the move in an hourlong televised speech, blaming the US and its allies for the current crisis and describing Ukraine's bid to join NATO as an existential challenge to Russia.

“Ukraine’s membership in NATO poses a direct threat to Russia’s security,” he said.

Russia says it wants Western guarantees that NATO won’t allow Ukraine and other former Soviet countries to join as members — and Putin said Monday that a simple moratorium on Ukraine’s accession wouldn’t be enough. Moscow has also demanded the alliance halt weapons deployments to Ukraine and roll back its forces from Eastern Europe — demands flatly rejected by the West.

Putin warned Monday that the Western rejection of Moscow's demands gives Russia the right to take other steps to protect its security.

Sweeping through more than a century of history, Putin painted today’s Ukraine as a modern construct used by the West to contain Russia despite the neighbors inextricable links.

In a stark warning to Ukraine, the Russian leader charged that it has unfairly inherited Russia's historic land granted to it by the Communist rulers of the Soviet Union and mocked its effort to shed the Communist past in a so-called “decommunization” campaign.

“We are ready to show you what the real decommunization would mean for Ukraine,” Putin added ominously in an apparent signal of his readiness to raise new land claims.

With an estimated 150,000 Russian troops massed on three sides of Ukraine, the US has warned that Moscow has already decided to invade. Still, President Joe Biden and Putin tentatively agreed to a meeting brokered by French President Emmanuel Macron in a last-ditch effort to avoid war.

Macron’s office said Biden and Putin had “accepted the principle of such a summit,” to be followed by a broader meeting that would include other “relevant stakeholders to discuss security and strategic stability in Europe.”

If Russia moves in, the meeting will be off, but the prospect of a face-to-face summit resuscitated hopes in diplomacy to prevent a conflict that could devastate Ukraine and cause huge economic damage across Europe, which is heavily dependent on Russian energy.

Tensions have continued to fly high in eastern Ukraine, with more shelling reported along the tense line of contact between the rebels and Ukrainian forces. Ukraine's military said two Ukrainian soldiers were killed and another 12 were wounded by shelling over the last 24 hours. It has rejected the rebel claims of shelling residential areas and insisted that Ukrainian forces weren’t returning fire.



US Blocks Maliki Bid, Sends Sharp Warning to Iran

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP)
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP)
TT

US Blocks Maliki Bid, Sends Sharp Warning to Iran

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP)
Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki (AP)

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s bid to return to power has stalled abruptly after the US delivered blunt warnings against the formation of a government seen as entrenching Iranian influence, raising the prospect that his nomination could collapse altogether.

According to sources, Washington objected to the current trajectory of government formation, arguing it reflects an Iranian rejection of a potential deal aimed at averting an imminent confrontation, and signaling that a Maliki-led government would face isolation.

Asharq Al-Awsat obtained the text of a US letter presented at a meeting of the Shiite Coordination Framework late on Monday, in which Washington rejected the mechanisms used to nominate the prime minister-designate and other senior posts, just two days after Maliki was put forward as the candidate of the largest parliamentary bloc.

The letter came two days after Maliki was named as the candidate of the largest parliamentary bloc for the premiership.

A source said a senior Coordination Framework leader received a surprise call from US officials early on Monday, during which Washington objected to the continued Iranian dominance over the government formation process.

A senior figure in Maliki’s State of Law coalition acknowledged that the US letter had shaken his candidacy and made a third term extremely difficult.

Questions had already been raised over whether the Coordination Framework, the country’s largest Shiite alliance, had received US signals opposing Maliki before his nomination was announced on Saturday, or whether Washington’s position hardened only after reports emerged of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s blessing for Maliki’s bid.

Details

In the early hours of January 26, a Shiite leader received a US call informing him that Washington views the Coordination Framework’s push to form an Iran-backed government as disregarding local and regional concerns and deepening suspicions of sustained Iranian influence in Iraq, exposing the country to risks and sanctions.

The letter said that Washington “will consider it a government under malign control, and reserves the right not to engage with it.”

Caretaker Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani also received a call from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, warning that a government dominated by Iran would be unable to put Iraq’s interests first or shield the country from regional conflicts.

Sudani, who had mobilized his political and governmental influence in pursuit of a second term, ultimately stepped aside in favor of Maliki and publicly described him as “the strongest man.” However, the terms of that arrangement remain unclear.

US diplomatic activity intensified on Monday evening when US envoy Tom Barrack told Kurdistan Democratic Party leader Masoud Barzani that “a government installed by Iran will not succeed, whether for the aspirations of Iraqis or Syrians, or for an effective partnership with the United States.”

Barrack’s reference to Iraqis and Syrians echoed Maliki’s past positions on political change in Damascus, where he was a strong ally of President Bashar al-Assad.

Following Barzani’s call with Barrack, Iraqi political forces announced the postponement of a Tuesday parliamentary session to elect a president. The delay is widely believed to reflect opposition to Maliki, disrupting a deal that would have seen a Barzani-backed candidate elected president.

Kurdish sources said the postponement came at Kurdish request after Barrack warned Barzani that pushing through a presidential election as part of a deal leading to Maliki’s appointment would antagonize Washington.

They added that Barzani had “taken a step back” after reportedly agreeing with Maliki on government formation two months ago.

A stormy meeting

On the evening of January 26, the Coordination Framework convened at the headquarters of the Islamic Virtue Party, where a Shiite leader conveyed the contents of the US letter regarding the future government.

The meeting exposed a rift between factions calling for caution and a review of Maliki’s nomination, and others insisting on pressing ahead and ignoring external objections. Tensions escalated to the point of shouting, and the dispute reportedly turned physical.

One participant was quoted as saying loudly, “We will not listen to the objections of any external party. This phase requires a strong Maliki.”

“What we remember about Maliki”

According to the letter read out at the meeting, the US administration supports Iraqi leaders’ commitment to steering the country away from conflict.

While the selection of the prime minister-designate and other senior posts is a sovereign Iraqi decision, Washington said it would make its own sovereign choices regarding engagement with the next government in line with US interests.

The letter said the United States focuses on interests rather than individuals, but that a viable partnership requires an Iraqi government that weakens Iran-backed terrorism, dismantles militias, places dangerous weapons under state control, and ensures that US-designated terrorist groups are excluded, particularly those that defy Iraqi disarmament decisions.

Such a government, the letter said, would allow Washington to work constructively for the benefit of both Iraqis and Americans.

It also urged Iraq to form an inclusive government representing all components of society, to maintain its current openness to regional partners, and to avoid a return to periods marked by sectarian polarization, regional tension, and isolation.

The letter warned that Maliki’s nomination risks reviving memories of his previous governments, which are viewed negatively in Washington and the region, at a time when Iraq is seeking a new era of stability, prosperity, and security through a mutually beneficial partnership with the United States.

The contents of the letter could not be independently verified with US sources. However, a Coordination Framework leader described it as “a new and decisive position by the US administration.”

A State of Law figure said Maliki’s nomination “may no longer work,” adding: “Yesterday, the ceiling fell on the third term.”

Earlier, State of Law spokesman Aqeel al-Fatlawi had said the United States was satisfied with Maliki’s nomination because he was “capable of controlling the factions,” according to local television.

Figures close to Maliki denied that his chances of being appointed had collapsed.

How did Maliki pass?

Sources said a Coordination Framework meeting on Saturday, which ended with Maliki’s nomination, included letters from European and Arab states expressing reservations about resorting to contentious options unlikely to promote regional stability.

When calls were made during the meeting to reconsider regional objections, one senior figure responded: “Since when do you like to listen to regional and international opinion?”

Before the nomination meeting, two second-tier Framework leaders traveled to Tehran, joined by a senior figure based there, and met Iranian officials to confirm whether Khamenei truly backed Maliki. They were told: “We bless your agreement. Go ahead and accelerate it. There is no time.”

Diplomatic sources believe Washington did not initially oppose Maliki’s name, but reacted after Iran’s direct involvement in the government formation process became public.

A Western diplomat told Asharq Al-Awsat that publicizing Khamenei’s blessing for Maliki angered US officials, prompting intensified pressure in recent hours to halt the process.

The diplomat said Maliki’s nomination ran counter to President Donald Trump’s desire to see Iran sign an agreement on US terms. While Washington had no issue with specific candidates, it viewed the formation of an Iran-aligned Iraqi government at a sensitive regional moment as highly problematic.

The diplomat said the US moves aim to prevent the emergence of an Iraqi government politically loyal to Tehran, force Shiite factions toward a less provocative compromise, and send Iran a clear message: do not expand your influence while negotiations are underway.


UN Experts Slam Swiss Penalties Over Anti-Israel Student Protests

 Palestinians walk along tents at a makeshift camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. (AP)
Palestinians walk along tents at a makeshift camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. (AP)
TT

UN Experts Slam Swiss Penalties Over Anti-Israel Student Protests

 Palestinians walk along tents at a makeshift camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. (AP)
Palestinians walk along tents at a makeshift camp for displaced people in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2026. (AP)

United Nations experts on Tuesday harshly criticized a top Swiss university's decision to pursue the criminal prosecution of students who peacefully protested against its partnerships with Israeli institutions.

"Peaceful student activism, on and off campus, is part of students' rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, and must not be criminalized," 10 independent UN experts said in a statement.

The experts pointed to criminal penalties sought by the publicly funded Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ) as mass student protests over Israel's war in Gaza rocked universities in many countries in May 2024.

Around 70 students had staged sit-ins at ETHZ, demanding transparency and disengagement from research linked to the Israeli military.

The experts, including the special rapporteurs on the right to education, to free expression, and on the rights situation in the Palestinian territories, pointed out that police were reportedly called within minutes.

"A large security presence (was) deployed, and the sit-ins forcibly dispersed, despite no teaching being interrupted and no violence occurring," the statement said.

After the protests, 38 ETHZ students received "penal orders" -- mainly fines of up to 2,700 Swiss francs ($3,500) -- including 17 who opted to appeal, it said.

"Recent court decisions have upheld trespass convictions against five students, while acquitting two others on procedural grounds," the statement said.

However, all students involved, including those acquitted, were required to bear court and administrative costs, amounting to at least 2,400 Swiss francs per person, a spokeswoman for the experts told AFP.

Decisions for the remaining 10 students are still pending.

The experts, who are mandated by the UN Human Rights Council, but who do not speak on behalf of the United Nations, called on the Swiss authorities and judicial system to "take full account of Switzerland's human rights obligations".

"Universities and states must ensure that expressing solidarity with human rights causes and demanding accountability from state institutions, especially in relation to well-documented instances of international crimes, do not lead to intimidation, prosecution, or long-term harm to students' futures," they said.


Rule of Law 'Routinely Challenged', Says ICC Head

The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. (Reuters)
The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. (Reuters)
TT

Rule of Law 'Routinely Challenged', Says ICC Head

The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. (Reuters)
The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. (Reuters)

The global rule of law is frequently coming under threat, the president of the International Criminal Court warned on Tuesday, vowing to stand up for justice and victims of atrocities.

At a ceremony marking the opening of the ICC's judicial year, Tomoko Akane said international justice was facing an "extraordinary moment."

"The ICC, as well as other judicial institutions around the globe, have been facing significant pressures, coercive measures and attempts to undermine their function," she said.

"Values and premises that we have accepted as a given, as well as the very notion of the rule of law, are being routinely questioned and challenged," added Akane.

The ICC is facing the most difficult period in its history.

Furious at arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the United States has slapped sanctions on top ICC officials, including judges.

This has hindered the court's ability to function and affected the lives of those sanctioned.

In addition, Russia has sentenced ICC officials to jail terms, in retaliation for arrest warrants against President Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine war.

"Now, more than ever, we must return to the fundamental ideas upon which we stand, the values of justice and humanity that transcend borders," said Akane.

She revealed the court had issued "numerous" further arrest warrants, although these have not yet been made public.

The ICC, based in The Hague, tries individuals suspected of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

On Monday, it announced a major step in one of its most high-profile cases.

Former Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte will face a so-called "confirmation of charges" hearing on February 23, after judges passed him fit.