Historian Rashid bin Asakir to Asharq Al-Awsat: Religious Dimension in Establishment of 1st Saudi State Is Overstated

A photo of Wadi Hanifa in 1917.
A photo of Wadi Hanifa in 1917.
TT

Historian Rashid bin Asakir to Asharq Al-Awsat: Religious Dimension in Establishment of 1st Saudi State Is Overstated

A photo of Wadi Hanifa in 1917.
A photo of Wadi Hanifa in 1917.

Readers of books that chronicle the history of the Arabian Peninsula, specifically its center (Najd or Al-Yamamah), from the early Islamic ages until the past four centuries, notice a reference to, or even an emphasis on the spread of ignorance, heresy and polytheism among the population. A number of accounts went to uunderline the lack of religious, cultural and scientific awareness in all their forms.

Many of us agree that the idea of establishing a state that would start from Diriyah and stretch over other regions has long haunted the rulers of this area, from Prince Mani’ Al-Muraydi, his sons and grandsons, to the day when Imam Mohammad bin Saud finally declared the birth of the First Saudi State three decades later.

In their narration, some historians focused on Imam Mohammad’s support for reforms, and considered it the basis for the establishment of the state. Many have overstressed the religious factor, which they saw as the most important motive for the creation of the state, which had fallen twice due to internal and external circumstances, to rise for the third time, and finally develop into a modern country and a key international player.

In order to better understand the environment and circumstances of the establishment of the First Saudi State, Asharq Al-Awsat met with historian, researcher and author Dr. Rashid bin Asakir.

A political and social pact

According to bin Asakir, some books that narrated the history of central Arabia reported that the Najd region in particular lacked all aspects of culture and knowledge. Heresy was prevalent since the early Islamic ages until the past four centuries, when the area witnessed the birth of the so-called reformist “Dawa” with Sheikh Mohammad bin Abdul Wahhab and the support of Imam Mohammad bin Saud.

However, bin Asakir said historical research showed that this narrative was inaccurate. The region lacked political unification, for religion existed and was based on spiritual teachings and the widespread Hanbali school of thought, which relied on the Quran and Sunnah.

The historian added that Imam Mohammad sought to forge political and military alliances, and to gain religious support for the preachers, including Sheikh Mohammad, about three centuries ago.

“This resulted in the creation of a new political and social pact whose framework we are still moving within despite the reforms that our society has witnessed,” he commented.

Bin Asakir noted that some historians did not refer to the presence of any cultural manifestations or the existence of a scientific renaissance at that time. Instead, they pointed to the spread of ignorance and other practices that contradicted the spirit of Islam.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that manuscripts, documents, poetry, artifacts, and other data were the largest and most reliable witness to the history of any nation.

With regard to the period that many books say was marked by ignorance and the spread of heresy and polytheism before the establishment of the First Saudi State, bin Asakir said that a large number of manuscripts, documents and poems confirm the contrary. He quoted men of literature who left their mark during that era, including poet Humaidan Al Shuwaier, who had mentioned, for example, that paying zakat (the third pillar of Islam) was a necessary matter that gained much attention by the rulers and members of the society.

He added that a Levantine scholar, Al-Awza’i, set out to seek knowledge in Riyadh (which was called at that time al-Yamama), and similarly, the well-known scholar and interpreter of dreams, Ibn Sirin, went to study at the Riyadh Mosque.

Bin Asakir pointed to a book by Abdullah Al Bassam, entitled, “Ulama' Najd” (The scholars of Najd), which lists the works of a large number of scholars that were translated by more than 800 linguists during the period that extended from the 9th to the 14th century AH.

“I had in my hands manuscripts belonging to a family in the Najd region. They were over a thousand documents dating back to varying periods, and holding useful information about the scientific, social and intellectual life that characterized this rich and prosperous region since the early Islamic ages,” bin Asakir told Asharq Al-Awsat.

A rich culture and heritage

According to bin Asakir, Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz provided him and other researchers with all the needed support to study the history of the Kingdom and Arabian Peninsula.

In this regard, he said he had recently embarked on a work pertaining to the royal family and the Al-Arid area, which includes Al-Aynah, Diriyah, Arqa, Riyadh, Manfuha and Al-Masani. He added that he has been collecting documents and manuscript books in the Najd region and other data on scholars, families, places, social life and heritage that have characterized this particular region.

“I reviewed many documents and manuscripts that I collected and came out with conclusions that this country is rich in its history, civilization and heritage…” he remarked.

Bin Asakir emphasized in this regard that the great transformation in the history of the region was the establishment of the First Saudi State, which is the first central state in the Arabian Peninsula, whose foundation began in 1139 AH.

“Its establishment was a necessity to achieve security for the residents of the region, which was contested by wars and conflicts. This was achieved with the presence of a leading, military, intellectual and administrative figure, who took advantage of the circumstances to found a state that achieves security, deters the oppressors and builds hope,” he stated.

Bin Asakir explained: “This was achieved by Imam Mohammad bin Saud and the imams who succeeded him, until the fall of the state due to external factors, then the establishment of the second state, followed by the Third Saudi State, which was established by King Abdulaziz… Today, it has become a modern state whose strength is acknowledged worldwide.”



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.