Jordan King Reiterates Need To Preserve Status Quo in Jerusalem

Jordanian King Abdullah II held talks on Thursday with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid at Al Husseiniya Palace (Petra)
Jordanian King Abdullah II held talks on Thursday with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid at Al Husseiniya Palace (Petra)
TT
20

Jordan King Reiterates Need To Preserve Status Quo in Jerusalem

Jordanian King Abdullah II held talks on Thursday with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid at Al Husseiniya Palace (Petra)
Jordanian King Abdullah II held talks on Thursday with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid at Al Husseiniya Palace (Petra)

Jordanian King Abdullah II on Thursday told Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid that Israel's "unilateral steps" in the holy city from accelerated Jewish settlement building to its attempts to change the legal status quo of the city undermined a two-state solution.

King Abdullah reaffirmed the need to step up efforts to achieve just and comprehensive peace based on the two-state solution that guarantees the establishment of an independent, sovereign, and a viable Palestinian state, on the 4 June 1967 lines, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

“The King reiterated the need to preserve the historical and legal status quo in Jerusalem, maintain calm, and stop unilateral action that undermines the two-state solution,” a royal palace statement said.

King Abdullah’s position came during a meeting with Lapid at Al Husseiniya Palace in Amman, where the two sides tackled measures to reactivate the peace process.

The King stressed that achieving a just peace based on the two-state solution is the key to bolstering regional cooperation.

Earlier on Thursday, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi also sat down with the visiting Israeli Minister.

Talks between the two sides focused on efforts to return to serious and effective negotiations to achieve peace based on the two-state solution.

Safadi said the two-state solution is the only means of achieving a just and lasting peace. Several issues of bilateral concern were also discussed during the talks.

Last Wednesday, Safadi had warned that prospects for achieving Middle East peace are "absent," and that Israeli measures undermining the two-state solution are continuing.

“Israeli settlements are a violation of international law, and practices to undermine peace should stop, as well as confiscating lands and displacing Palestinians from their homes, in Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, and in Silwan area,” the Minister said.

Addressing the 157th regular session of the Arab League at the Ministerial level in Cairo, Safadi said Jerusalem is the key to peace, and Arab countries should work together, on a permanent and systematic basis, to protect its Arab, Islamic and Christian identity, and preserve its historic and legal status quo and its sanctities.



Egypt-Israel Gas Deal Raises Questions over Mutual Dependence

Egypt says Israel gas deal not new, won’t alter Palestine stance (AFP)
Egypt says Israel gas deal not new, won’t alter Palestine stance (AFP)
TT
20

Egypt-Israel Gas Deal Raises Questions over Mutual Dependence

Egypt says Israel gas deal not new, won’t alter Palestine stance (AFP)
Egypt says Israel gas deal not new, won’t alter Palestine stance (AFP)

Egypt’s decision to extend and expand a multi-billion-dollar natural gas import deal with Israel has stirred debate at home, with critics questioning who benefits most from what has been described as one of the world’s largest energy agreements.

Israeli firm NewMed Energy, a partner in the Leviathan gas field, said earlier this month that it had revised its supply agreement with Egypt, extending it until 2040 in a deal worth up to $35 billion. Since 2020, Leviathan has supplied Egypt with 23.5 billion cubic meters of gas, according to the company.

The announcement came as Israel’s war in Gaza continues, deepening scrutiny over the agreement. Egyptian officials, however, say the deal is driven by economics, not politics.

“Egypt’s economic agreements, whether with Israel or others, are based on national interests and returns,” a senior Egyptian official told Asharq al-Awsat.

He said the deal secures cheaper gas supplies compared with imports from elsewhere, and supports Egypt’s ambition to become a regional energy hub by re-exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly defended the arrangement last week, describing it as an extension of a 2019 deal, while the oil ministry issued a statement stressing it was “a modification of an existing agreement.”

“The deal ensures medium-term supplies through the Sinai pipeline without the costs of liquefaction and regasification,” said energy exert Maher Aziz. “It is not about who depends on whom, but about two neighbors securing each other’s needs despite political rifts.”

Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen hailed the deal during a visit to Leviathan alongside the US ambassador, saying it proved Israel’s role as a “strategic energy supplier” and underlined gas’s role in regional stability.

Egypt once exported gas to Israel via the Arish-Ashkelon pipeline until attacks in Sinai halted flows in 2012. Now the direction is reversed, with Israel piping gas to Egypt for liquefaction and re-export to Europe.

Analysts remain divided over who benefits most. Some, like US-based economist Mostafa Youssef, argue Israel gains global market access through Egypt’s LNG plants at a time when it faces political isolation over Gaza.

Others say both sides have little choice but to keep energy cooperation insulated from regional turmoil.

“Energy ties reflect mutual dependence,” said Washington-based scholar Ahmed Hassanein Abdel-Maqsoud.

“Egypt gets competitively priced gas, while Israel relies almost entirely on Egypt’s liquefaction facilities to reach European markets. That makes the deal indispensable for both,” he explained.