Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
TT
20

Rushing Clean Energy Could Stifle Everyone

Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)
Traffic at a gas station in central Paris (AFP)

In December 2021, the Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman al-Saud warned that the world is heading towards an energy crisis if investments in the oil sector continue to decrease.

Prince Abdulaziz touted investment as the only way to preserve energy supplies and meet market needs.

Last week, the price of an oil barrel shot up to $140 per barrel. The price hike can be traced back to an increase in demand and a drop in supplies as well as political events the world is experiencing today, the most important of which is the Russian-Ukrainian war and the Iranian nuclear talks.

Prince Abdulaziz’s warning came in response to an international drive towards reducing investment in fossil fuels, gas and oil, which led to a decrease in direct and indirect investments in the energy sector, estimated at hundreds of billions of dollars from 2014 until 2021.

Companies Roll back Investments

A report issued by CleanTechnica – a US-based website specializing in clean energy - indicated that multinational companies’ volume of investments taken out of fossil fuels in 2014 amounted to about $52 billion. In 2018, it amounted to more than $125 billion.

In 2019, 1110 institutions with assets of more than 11 trillion dollars committed to getting rid of fossil fuels. The once strong industry started witnessing a steady decline in its position. Because of the decrease in the number of institutional investors, lower profits, and weak expectations, companies such as BP, Equinor and Repsol wrote off a total of more than $11 billion in North American shale oil assets.

In 2020, 42 investment institutions from 14 countries announced the withdrawal of their investments from fossil fuels, and BlackRock, the world’s largest investment management company, announced that environmental sustainability would be a key and decisive factor in future investment decisions.

Moreover, the New York State Pension Fund decided to phase out oil and gas companies by 2024 and completely decarbonize its portfolio, estimated to be worth more than $500 billion, by 2040.

Increasing Taxes, Selling Assets

Mazen Al-Sudairy, head of research at Al-Rajhi Capital, said that the most important problems facing companies investing in fossil fuels include the increase in the cost of taxes in exchange for subsidizing renewable energy, and some countries, especially in Europe, adopting strict policies to get companies to invest in renewable energy.

Al-Sudairy noted that the decision by EU leaders to impose a “carbon tax” to reduce the use of fossil fuels had an evident impact on oil companies, especially considering current crises.

These policies prompted some companies to sell part of their assets, such as Shell and the Italian Eni, Al-Sudairy told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Moreover, BP is currently selling its stake in the Russian company, Rosneft, which constitutes 15% of the company’s production.

The London-based multinational oil and gas company has also exited fossil fuel investments in the US and is expected to pull the plug faster on its fossil fuel investments in the near future.

This puts pressure on the oil industry.

Al-Sudairy added that BP announced its intentions to sell its fossil fuel assets at a value of $25 billion by 2025, which is equivalent to about 13% of the company’s total fixed assets. The research expert said the move would “make matters worse,” especially with the increase in global demand for fossil fuels.

The structural lack of investments and insufficient capital spending will have major impacts on global production of fossil fuels, stressed Al-Sudairy.

He pointed out that in the event of continued reluctance to invest in the sector, the market would lose about 16 million oil barrels by 2030.

There is a need for investments in fossil fuels to exceed 450 billion dollars annually, emphasized Al-Sudairy.

The world’s largest international oil companies, or IOCs, sold over $198 billion of assets between 2015 and 2020, over four times the amount they invested into clean energy technologies, said a Bloomberg New Energy Finance report.

European IOCs notably diverged from their US peers. Equinor was the only IOC to see clean energy investment outstrip divestment proceeds.

Despite high levels of divestment from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips, they collectively invested just $757 million in clean energy, only 1% of the divestment proceeds.

Paris Agreement Battle

The Paris Climate Accords, signed in Paris in 2015, had entered into force in November 2016. The international climate treaty focuses on facing the problem of greenhouse gas emissions and finding solutions to adapt and mitigate their damage to the environment.

It also looks seriously at the obvious effects of climate change and seeks to launch initiatives that contribute to reducing emissions to get rid of dependence on fossil fuels.

One of the architects of this agreement is former US Secretary of State John Kerry, who is now the presidential envoy on climate affairs.

The Paris agreement was followed by calls from international institutions to get rid of investment in fossil fuels to access renewable energy, with the International Energy Agency leading a campaign of warnings against investors for not financing new oil, gas and coal projects.

Saudi Warnings

Prince Abdulaziz renewed his warning of challenges emerging to policymakers due to the rise in prices, describing the campaign against investments in the oil and gas sectors as “short-sighted and will have an impact on global welfare.”

The energy minister stressed that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would continue to invest in the oil and gas sectors as well as renewable energy.

He explained that the world is going through a stage of energy transition, “and it is wrong to focus on one aspect such as renewable energy because the world economy requires various sources of energy to develop.”

Prince Abdulaziz said that sustainability, which is the result of the circular economy of carbon, will be dependent on technology capable of ensuring a rise in the demand for fossil fuels while addressing emissions through technology.

It is noteworthy that G20 countries had agreed to adopt the circular economy approach to carbon, which was proposed by Saudi Arabia at the G20 Riyadh Summit in 2020.

For its part, the International Energy Agency said it expected a decline in demand to coincide with an increase in supplies during the coming period, expecting a decrease in oil demand by about 100,000 barrels per day in 2021 and 2022.

“Supplies may rise by 6.4 million barrels per day next year, compared to an increase of 1.5 million barrels in 2021,” said the agency in its December 2021 report.

“Continuing to retreat from the cuts may lead to a surplus of about two million barrels in the second quarter of 2022,” the report added.

On the other hand, a report issued by OPEC in 2020 predicted that global demand for crude oil will grow by 2025 to 103.7 million barrels per day, and by 2030 it will rise to 107.2 million barrels per day, then to 108.9 million barrels per day by 2035.

According to the report, global oil demands will grow to 109.3 million barrels per day by 2040.



Oil Climbs $1 as Price Drop Triggers Buying; Oversupply Worries Weigh

FILE PHOTO: An oil pumpjack operates near Williston, North Dakota January 23, 2015. REUTERS/Andrew Cullen/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: An oil pumpjack operates near Williston, North Dakota January 23, 2015. REUTERS/Andrew Cullen/File Photo
TT
20

Oil Climbs $1 as Price Drop Triggers Buying; Oversupply Worries Weigh

FILE PHOTO: An oil pumpjack operates near Williston, North Dakota January 23, 2015. REUTERS/Andrew Cullen/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: An oil pumpjack operates near Williston, North Dakota January 23, 2015. REUTERS/Andrew Cullen/File Photo

Oil gained more than $1 per barrel on Tuesday, rebounding on technical factors and bargain hunting after a decision by OPEC+ to boost output sent prices down the previous session, although concerns about the market surplus outlook persisted.

Brent crude futures rose $1.15 to $61.38 a barrel by 0623 GMT, the first time gain after six consecutive declines, while US West Texas Intermediate crude added $1.11 to $58.24 a barrel.

Both benchmarks had settled at their lowest since February 2021 on Monday, driven by an OPEC+ decision over the weekend to further speed up oil production hikes for a second consecutive month.

"Today’s slight rebound in oil prices appears more technical than fundamental," said Yeap Jun Rong, a market strategist at IG. "Persistent headwinds including a pivotal shift in OPEC+ production strategy, uncertain demand amid US tariff risks, and price forecast downgrades are continuing to weigh on the broader price movement."

Driven by expectations that production will exceed consumption, oil has lost over 10% in six straight sessions and dipped over 20% since April when US President Donald Trump's tariff shocks prompted increased bets on a slowdown in the global economy.

The return of Chinese market participants after a five-day public holiday since May 1 was seen supporting prices on Tuesday.

"China also reopened today, and being the largest importer, buyers would have likely jumped to secure oil at current low levels," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova.

Also lending some support was data showing a pick-up in services sector's growth in the US, the world's major oil consumer, as orders increased.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said on Monday its nonmanufacturing purchasing managers index (PMI) increased to 51.6 last month from 50.8 in March. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the services PMI dipping to 50.2.

The US Federal Reserve will likely leave interest rates unchanged on Wednesday as tariffs roil the economic outlook.

Barclays lowered its Brent crude forecast on Monday by $4 to $70 a barrel for 2025 and set its 2026 estimate at $62 a barrel, citing "a rocky road ahead for fundamentals" amid escalating trade tensions and OPEC+'s pivot in its production strategy.

Goldman Sachs also lowered its oil price forecast on Monday by $2-3 per barrel, as they now expect another 400,000 barrels per day production increase by OPEC+ in July.