US Says New Iran Response on Nuclear Deal 'Not Constructive'

The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (Reuters)
The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (Reuters)
TT

US Says New Iran Response on Nuclear Deal 'Not Constructive'

The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (Reuters)
The Iranian flag waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Vienna, Austria May 23, 2021. (Reuters)

The United States said Thursday that a new response from Iran on reviving a landmark nuclear deal was "not constructive," a day after European mediators were hopeful at finally crossing the finish line.

It is the latest in a back and forth between the adversaries via the European Union, which in August broke a deadlock after a year and a half of slow-moving diplomacy.

The European Union put forward on August 8 what it called a final text to restore the 2015 nuclear accord, which was trashed by former US president Donald Trump, said AFP.

Iran proposed changes to it -- largely accepted by the Europeans -- to which the United States issued a response through the mediators.

Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Nasser Kanani said earlier Thursday that Tehran sent another reply in response to the US position.

"We can confirm that we have received Iran's response through the EU," State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said late Thursday in Washington.

"We are studying it and will respond through the EU, but unfortunately it is not constructive."

Kanani, quoted by the official IRNA news agency, had said that Iran was taking a "constructive approach" in its diplomacy.

- Sticking points remain -

The United States has declined to discuss details publicly but disputes include Iran's insistence on the UN nuclear watchdog closing a probe of three undeclared sites suspected in nuclear work before the 2015 nuclear deal.

If President Joe Biden returns to the deal, the United States would ease sanctions in return for Iran accepting stringent restrictions on its nuclear program.

The United States would end Trump's unilateral US effort to stop other nations from buying Iranian oil.

Iran would then within months be able to sell potentially more than one million barrels more of oil a day, further easing global crude prices that soared after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Biden took office aiming to restore the accord despite heated opposition both from US ally Israel and lawmakers from Trump's Republican Party.

But Iran pressed hard in talks in Vienna, refusing even to see US envoy Rob Malley in person and forcing EU envoys to shuttle between hotels.

In a turning point, the United States said in August that Iran dropped one key stumbling block -- that Biden reverse Trump's blacklisting of the elite Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist group.

The Eurasia Group consultancy, in an analysis after Washington submitted its reply, said the odds of reviving the deal this year were at 45 percent as developments have been primarily about public messaging.

"There is less here than meets the eye," it said.

Israel, however, appears to see momentum. Prime Minister Yair Lapid has stepped up calls on the West to kill the deal and spoke at length to Biden by telephone on Wednesday.

Israel says the agreement would offer dangerous new funding to its arch-enemy and has waged a shadowy campaign inside Iran to sabotage the nuclear program.

The Biden administration argues that Trump's pullout has achieved little other than speeding up Iran's nuclear work.
Iran denies it is seeking a nuclear weapon but has rolled back commitments under the 2015 accord, with US intelligence saying it would now be closer to making a nuclear bomb if it chooses to pursue one.



Trump Says Strait of Hormuz Has Been Demined, Warns Iran Not to Plant More

Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are visible near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, August 25, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are visible near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, August 25, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
TT

Trump Says Strait of Hormuz Has Been Demined, Warns Iran Not to Plant More

Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are visible near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, August 25, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz are visible near the beach of Bandar Abbas, Iran, August 25, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that all mines had been detonated or removed from international waters of the Strait of Hormuz and that Iran has been told that any ship or boat placing new mines will be destroyed.

In a post ⁠on Truth Social, ⁠Trump said the United States, through its Space Force, was watching "every square inch" of the Strait, a key waterway in the global energy supply chain.

"There is ⁠a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect," Trump said.

The US and Iran have not conducted air strikes on each other's militaries for weeks, but attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz have continued as the two sides vie for ⁠control of ⁠the narrow maritime passage.

Oil transits through the strait were at 5 million barrels per day on Monday, provisional data from shiptracker Vortexa showed, down from more than 20 million per day before the war or about one of every five barrels consumed worldwide.


Ukraine’s Zelenskiy Sees Window for US Mediation Until Summer 2027

 Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference following a meeting of the so-called Coalition of the Willing group, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine August 24, 2026. (Reuters)
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference following a meeting of the so-called Coalition of the Willing group, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine August 24, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Ukraine’s Zelenskiy Sees Window for US Mediation Until Summer 2027

 Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference following a meeting of the so-called Coalition of the Willing group, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine August 24, 2026. (Reuters)
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference following a meeting of the so-called Coalition of the Willing group, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine August 24, 2026. (Reuters)

Ukraine sees a window of opportunity for US mediation to end Russia's war in Ukraine until the end of next summer and has drafted one page of ideas with US and European officials to be presented to Moscow, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said.

Zelenskiy said that a ceasefire and a previously discussed US proposal for a free economic zone in Ukraine's eastern Donbas area — to be administered by a third party — were among the ideas in the ‌document.

"It contains ‌one of the ideas for a ceasefire — that ‌is ⁠the main point. The ⁠second part concerns what the Americans proposed regarding a free economic zone," Zelenskiy told reporters in a weekend briefing.

Zelenskiy said that he saw a window to end the nearly four-and-a-half years of fighting that stretched from the G20 summit in the US in December this year until the end of summer 2027, given the looming campaign for the ⁠2028 presidential election in the US.

Zelenskiy said earlier this ‌month that Ukraine had handed proposals to ‌US negotiators for a plan to end the war, without providing more detail.

US-led ‌peace talks fell apart earlier this year as Ukraine refused Russian ‌demands to cede more territory and as Washington became increasingly preoccupied with the conflict with Iran.

US negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner were last in Moscow in January and have not yet visited Kyiv.

Zelenskiy said the third ‌element in the draft proposal was the role that the European Union and NATO would play and ⁠what "Ukraine is ⁠prepared to do to achieve this". He did not elaborate further.

"These three ideas I've mentioned are not exclusively Ukrainian ideas," Zelenskiy said, adding they were developed jointly with the Americans and the Europeans, with some stemming from previous talks US negotiators had with Ukraine and Russia.

Russia was open to listening to new proposals on how to reach a settlement on the Ukraine conflict, but they should reflect the "realities on the ground", a senior Russian diplomat said in an interview published last week.

Moscow's key objective is capturing the remainder of Donbas, where it has been making a push to advance into Ukraine's so-called fortress belt of eastern cities.


UN, Red Cross Chiefs: World Must Rein in Autonomous Weapons

FILE PHOTO: United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres leaves after a press conference at a UN compound in the Nicosia airport area, Cyprus, July 29, 2026. REUTERS/Yiannis Kourtoglou/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres leaves after a press conference at a UN compound in the Nicosia airport area, Cyprus, July 29, 2026. REUTERS/Yiannis Kourtoglou/File Photo
TT

UN, Red Cross Chiefs: World Must Rein in Autonomous Weapons

FILE PHOTO: United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres leaves after a press conference at a UN compound in the Nicosia airport area, Cyprus, July 29, 2026. REUTERS/Yiannis Kourtoglou/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres leaves after a press conference at a UN compound in the Nicosia airport area, Cyprus, July 29, 2026. REUTERS/Yiannis Kourtoglou/File Photo

The United Nations and Red Cross warned Tuesday the world is "dangerously close" to a future where autonomous weapons -- so-called "killer robots" -- could target humans, and issued an urgent appeal for international regulations.

The warning follows a call in 2023 from UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and Mirjana Spoljaric, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, for countries to establish specific bans and restrictions on the rapidly developing technology by this year.

"Today, we renew this call with even greater urgency," they said in a joint statement, adding that while their "fundamental concerns remain unchanged... the risks have intensified.”

"We are now dangerously close to crossing a moral red line: the autonomous targeting of humans by machines," they warned.

Lethal autonomous weapon systems are generally understood as weapon systems that select targets and apply force without human intervention.

There has to date been no confirmed use of fully autonomous weapons.

But with global tensions soaring and conflicts raging in the Middle East and Ukraine, where drone warfare has become a major feature of the battlefield, fears abound that it could soon happen.

There is currently no specific treaty on autonomous and artificial intelligence-enabled weapons.

"Autonomous weapon systems are not part of a distant future: a race towards greater autonomy in weapons systems is already well under way," AFP quoted Guterres and Spoljaric as saying.

"Future generations will ask whether leaders acted when there was still a chance to set limits before these weapons proliferated beyond control."

They highlighted that scientists and engineers involved in developing such systems had, in many cases, raised the alarm themselves.

"When the architects of this technology are calling for limits, states cannot afford to remain passive," they said.

Discussions have been running for a decade around a possible future treaty regulating the use of autonomous weapons.

After three years of discussions, countries are due to decide in November whether to launch full-on treaty negotiations.

The UN and Red Cross chiefs called for "political courage,” saying: "A failure to act quickly and decisively will cost lives."

The need for clearly defined rules was "urgent,” they said, insisting that "innovation must serve humanity -- not endanger it.”