Kurdish Progressive Party to Asharq Al-Awsat: Damascus’ Opting for Military Solution Led to Foreign Meddling

Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party politburo official Ahmed Sulaiman. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party politburo official Ahmed Sulaiman. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Kurdish Progressive Party to Asharq Al-Awsat: Damascus’ Opting for Military Solution Led to Foreign Meddling

Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party politburo official Ahmed Sulaiman. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party politburo official Ahmed Sulaiman. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party, one of Syria’s oldest Kurdish parties, believes that efforts to normalize relations between the Damascus regime and Ankara came at Russia’s request and Iranian encouragement in wake of the summit held between Russia, Türkiye and Iran in July.

Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party politburo official Ahmed Sulaiman said they have called for dialogue with Bashar al-Assad's regime to “resolve the Kurdish issue for which we have strived for.”

However, the regime’s resorting to the military option “has complicated the scene.”

In an interview to Asharq Al-Awsat, Sulaiman acknowledged the need to “reassure” Türkiye that the situation in Syria is not a threat to its national security.

The Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party was formed in 1957. It has been striving politically for years to resolve the Kurdish issue as part of a comprehensive political solution in Syria. This lies in the transition to a pluralist democratic system that recognizes Kurds in the country and grants them their legitimate rights. Party officials have over the past 11 years of war held direct talks with regime officials to help reach their goals.

“Perhaps any breakthrough in relations between Ankara and Damascus will favor the Syrian regime above all else,” Sulaiman told Asharq Al-Awsat from Qamishli.

“We support having normal relations between Syria and neighboring countries, including Türkiye,” he added.

Contrary to what Turkish officials claim, the situation in Syria does not pose a threat to their national security, he went on to say.

At the same time, resolving the situation in Syria must not take place at the expense of the Syrian people, especially the Kurds, he stressed.

“We all know that Türkiye’s first and last demand is preventing the resolution of the Kurdish issue in Syria. Should Ankara reach understandings with Damascus, it will insist that the Kurds lose all their administrative and military gains and limit the power of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF),” said Sulaiman.

After the battles in Ain al-Arab in 2014, the occupation of Afrin in 2018 and Ras al-Ain and Tall Abyad in 2019, and the migration of thousands of Kurds to neighboring countries and Europe, Kurdish forces should have preserved their independent political decision-making to protect their cause, he remarked.

They should have kept a distance from regional and international meddling in Syria, he added.

Kurdish parties may have made tactical gains, but they squandered potential opportunities to resolve the Kurdish issue, he lamented. The issue is now at the mercy of regional and international interference in Syria.

“Therefore, any solution these international parties may reach over Syria will take place at the expense of the Kurdish people and their rights in the country because they are viewed as the weakest link and least influential on these parties,” he explained.

The Kurdish Democratic Progressive Party had since the eruption of the war been calling for direct negotiations and dialogue with the regime.

Sulaiman said: “We have called for dialogue with the regime to discuss possible solutions, especially regarding the Kurdish issue.”

“The regime, however, opted for the military solution and complicated the possibility of reaching a national solution,” he added.

“Even worse, it opened its arms wide for foreign meddling,” Sulaiman remarked.

Asked if the Progressive Party had held direct meetings with regime and government officials, he replied that such talks were held in Damascus.

The last of these meetings was held in April, revealed Sulaiman.

“We believe that dialogue with the regime demands united Kurdish ranks and a common position over the rights of the Kurdish people,” he went on to say.

“This is why our party visited Damascus. The talks focused on the mechanisms needed to open serious channels of dialogue and understand the regime’s position clearer and its vision of addressing the crisis and resolving the Kurdish issue in specific,” he stated.

“Resolving the Kurdish issue lies in Damascus. Without reaching this conviction, there can be no real solution to the issue in Syria,” he declared.

“We welcome the role played by the United Nations and international mediations, especially Russia’s influence through its close ties with the regime,” he said.



Russian Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Mining Concessions Dependent on Ukraine Talks Progress

Alexander Ionov, a member of Russia’s Human Rights Council under President Vladimir Putin (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Alexander Ionov, a member of Russia’s Human Rights Council under President Vladimir Putin (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Russian Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Mining Concessions Dependent on Ukraine Talks Progress

Alexander Ionov, a member of Russia’s Human Rights Council under President Vladimir Putin (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Alexander Ionov, a member of Russia’s Human Rights Council under President Vladimir Putin (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Amid statements made by US President Donald Trump regarding the future of agreements brokered by Riyadh over the Russia-Ukraine crisis, a Russian official has expressed Moscow's readiness to make concessions on certain raw materials and mining activities under US negotiation.

However, the official linked these concessions to the outcomes of talks in Riyadh.

Alexander Ionov, a member of Russia’s Human Rights Council under President Vladimir Putin, revealed that the Russian side supports establishing relations with the US.

According to Ionov, Russia is willing to make concessions on certain raw materials and mining activities, but everything depends on the negotiations concerning Ukraine.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Ionov pointed out that if progress is made in US-Russia understandings on Ukraine, and results are seen regarding the lifting of sanctions, that could potentially be the key to establishing normal, positive relations.

However, so far, Trump’s rhetoric remains purely political, with no concrete steps taken.

Regarding the potential inclusion of European Union countries in Ukraine-related negotiations at some stage, Ionov said that the negotiations are progressing, but the Ukrainian side is seeking to garner European support and set its own terms, which conflict with the views of both Russia and the US.

The White House is frustrated with Kyiv’s rhetoric, and Trump’s team is exerting significant pressure.

Ionov continued to say that everyone is waiting for the Black Sea agreement, reached by the Russian and US delegations, to come into effect.

However, it’s clear that this deal will only be effective after a ceasefire. In the meantime, Kyiv is losing territory, while Russia has liberated the Kursk region.

According to Ionov, European countries are eager to join the negotiation process, but for obvious reasons, they cannot be full participants. They support the Ukrainian scenario of autonomy, which means maintaining Ukraine’s territory as it stood in 1991.

He pointed out that leaders from many countries, especially France and the UK, have called for NATO peacekeeping forces to be deployed in Ukraine.

This is unacceptable to Russia, affirmed Ionov.

In general, we see an aggressive stance from European leaders who are willing to continue investing in this direction.

Ionov believes that US President Donald Trump wants to expedite the signing of a peace agreement on the Ukraine conflict, as he sees it as part of his election campaign.

However, the EU and Ukraine are slowing down the process, coupled with significant tensions in negotiations between the US and Russian delegations, with little progress made.

On the effectiveness of sanctions imposed on Russia, Ionov argued that Trump should find the real culprit in this whole matter, rather than threaten to impose restrictions on Russian oil.

In general, this will not have much impact on Russia’s economy, as the main consumers of Russian raw materials are not in the West, but in the East, confirmed Ionov.

Additionally, Russia has much greater influence over OPEC than the US. Saudi Arabia is actively cooperating with Russia and Venezuela on the oil market, and the US can do little about it at this point.

In reality, the Russian side supports building relations with the US, and it is willing to make concessions on certain raw materials and mining activities. But everything depends on the negotiations concerning Ukraine.

As for Saudi- Russian relations, Ionov reaffirmed that Russia engages with the Saudi people with warmth and kindness. Much work is being done at the official level, as Saudi Arabia is a key partner for Russia in the Middle East, he added.

Russian-Saudi cooperation shows a shared effort in developing the regional security framework, as well as advancing projects in humanitarian cooperation.

Ionov hoped the Kingdom will continue its efforts in developing joint energy projects with Russia and will participate in the BRICS alliance.