Iraqi FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Are Mediating Between Washington, Tehran

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein during his interview. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein during his interview. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Iraqi FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Are Mediating Between Washington, Tehran

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein during his interview. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein during his interview. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Iraqi government is playing a role in “bringing opposites together and creating a situation that promotes dialogue” among neighboring countries, especially Arab Gulf states, Türkiye, and Iran, said Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein in an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat on the sidelines of the 77th UN General Assembly in New York.

Hussein emphasized that Saudi Arabia plays a vital role on the Gulf, regional, Arab, Islamic, and international levels. He also voiced his belief that if the Kingdom’s relationship with Iran improves, its role will “be bigger and stronger.”

The top Iraqi diplomat hoped that dialogue between Saudi Arabia and Iran would move from the security to the diplomatic level.

Hussein revealed that Baghdad is mediating between the US and Iran because it is in Iraq’s interest to help the two parties in returning to the 2015 nuclear deal. He added that the remaining dispute between Washington and Tehran revolves around “the interdependence between the agreement and solving some problems outside of the deal.”

The minister stressed that the “6 + 4 group,” which includes Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, and Yemen, is not against Iran.

Instead, the “cooperation group” tackles economic and security fields and energy security.

Speaking on Iraq’s present role in bringing the views of various Arab countries closer to other countries, Hussein said: “We play a leading role in the region in bringing together opposites and in creating a dialogue atmosphere rather than going to conflicts.”

“We support dialogue,” affirmed Hussein.

“But when we talk about creating a dialogue situation, the conditions must also be prepared, and there must be mutual recognition between the parties,” explained Hussein, adding that Iraqi foreign policy prioritizes neighboring countries.

Saudi Arabia on Arab, Islamic and int'l levels

When asked about the relationship he shares with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, Hussein pointed out that Iraqi diplomacy is keen on holding personal meetings.

“We have good personal relations with all the ministers of the Gulf states, as well as with the foreign ministers of neighboring countries, such as Iran and Türkiye,” said Hussein.

“Our relations are strong, and we can communicate at any time with any minister,” he stressed, adding that most foreign ministers contact Iraq when they are facing trouble with Iran and Türkiye.

“We do our due diligence and don’t announce it,” explained Hussein.

On enhancing the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, Hussein started by noting that the Kingdom plays a significant role in the Gulf, regional, Arab, Islamic, and international environments.

“If the relationship between the Kingdom and neighboring Iran improves, I think that this role will be bigger and stronger.”

Hussein explained that Iraq is keen on maintaining a healthy environment in the region and that any tension between surrounding countries reflects negatively on its situation.

“Whenever there is a good situation and normal relations between these countries, this will positively affect the internal Iraqi situation,” said Hussein.

As for progress on bringing views closer, the FM remarked that concerned countries must comment on the matter because it involves bilateral relations.

According to the minister, discussions between Riyadh, Tehran and Baghdad have started to tackle ways to raise the level of dialogue from a military aspect to a diplomatic one. They have already held five rounds of talks.

“If matters were agreed upon, this would mean that the Saudi-Iranian dialogue in Baghdad would be made public.”

“We hope to reach this stage. We are working in this direction,” confirmed Hussein.

Commenting on complaints regarding Iran’s interference in the internal affairs of Iraq, Hussein said: “This is a bilateral issue between Iraq and Iran.”

Mediating between the US and Iran

Speaking about Iraq’s position on Iran’s contentious nuclear deal, Hussein said: “Iraq's position is clear. We are in favor of reaching an agreement on the nuclear program. We support the Vienna talks.”

“During the last two years, we have been in constant contact between Washington and Tehran, even during elections,” revealed Hussein, stressing that his country is helping both parties.

“The goal of Iraqi policy in this field is to reach an agreement between Iran and the US.”

As to why Iraq is seeking Iranian-American agreement, Hussein explained that that his country is doing so because of the issue’s Arab dimension and the repercussions it could lead to if a deal is not reached.

“Creating another crisis while we have many crises directly affects the region,” said Hussein.

“Second, because of the strong relations between Baghdad and Washington, and the strong relations with neighboring Iran, any tension between the two parties will affect Iraq politically.”

“It is in the Iraqi interest to help the two parties reach a conclusion.”

“I had a meeting (last week) with Iranian Foreign Minister (Hossein Amir) Abdollahian and before that with some American officials to discuss the issue,” revealed Hussein.

“We are still trying to bring the two sides closer together. But there are problems. The issue is that there is a correlation between the agreement and the solution of some problems outside the deal,” he added.

“These problems have started to emerge recently, but we are still in dialogue with the two parties and we will see what unfolds,” noted Hussein, expressing relief that both parties trust Iraq.

“We discuss the Iranian position with the American side, we discuss the American position with the Iranian side, and we try to find ways to reach understandings.”

Hussein refrained from responding to a question on whether he believes that a US-Iranian agreement could be reached and repeated that he wishes for a deal to come through.



Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
TT
20

Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).

As Sudan grapples with ongoing turmoil following the outbreak of war in April 2023, the establishment of a “parallel government” in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has sparked widespread concern. Domestically, regionally, and internationally, fears are mounting over Sudan’s future, the risk of further division, and the threat of another partition. However, supporters of this initiative—who recently signed a new constitution and a governance roadmap—view it as a major opportunity to build a new Sudan founded on freedom, democracy, and justice, preventing the country from descending into chaos and fragmentation.

A Government for Peace and Unity

The new administration, known as the “Government of Peace and Unity,” aims to rebuild the state on principles of justice and equality while ensuring essential services for all Sudanese citizens—not just those in RSF-controlled areas. Its proponents have sought to reassure both Sudanese citizens and neighboring countries that their objective is to preserve Sudan’s unity.

Emerging at a critical juncture, this initiative presents itself as an alternative to the military-backed government based in Port Sudan, which serves as Sudan’s temporary capital. The parallel government hopes to earn the trust of Sudanese citizens and secure international support by demonstrating a serious commitment to ending the war and reconstructing the state on democratic, secular, and decentralized foundations.

Will this government succeed in bringing about the desired peace, or will the challenges it faces prove insurmountable? Asharq Al-Awsat spoke with Dr. Al-Hadi Idris, a key leader in the “Tasis” coalition behind the formation of the parallel government.

Why Form a Parallel Government?

Idris, a former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council during the transitional government led by Dr. Abdalla Hamdok, emphasized that their goal is to establish a “government of peace and unity.”

“As a political and military force, we have always been committed to resolving Sudan’s crisis, which erupted on April 15, 2023, through peaceful means,” Idris explained. “We have made extensive efforts to push those supporting the war toward dialogue and engagement with peace initiatives, including those in Jeddah, Manama, and Geneva. However, the army and the de facto authorities in Port Sudan have refused to negotiate. This left us with no choice but to explore more effective ways to bring the warring parties to the table and stop the conflict. The formation of a parallel government is a step toward fulfilling our responsibilities to the many people who have been neglected and left without adequate care.”

Why Is the Army Refusing Dialogue?

Idris, who also leads the Revolutionary Front—a coalition of armed movements from Darfur and political groups outside the region, such as the Beja Congress led by Osama Saeed and the Kush Movement from northern Sudan—claims that the military’s reluctance to negotiate stems from external influences.

“We understand why the army refuses to come to the negotiating table,” he said. “It is under the control of the Islamic movement and remnants of the former regime, who fear that any political process will remove them from power and diminish their influence. They are keen on prolonging the war despite the devastation, suffering, and displacement it causes to civilians.”

Accusations of Division Policies

Idris accused Sudan’s military leaders of implementing measures that risk deepening the country’s divisions. These include issuing a new currency exclusive to areas under their control, restricting access to education in certain regions, and selectively issuing travel and identity documents.

“Such actions could lead to the country’s partition, which we completely oppose,” he stressed.

A Government for All Sudanese

Idris rejected claims that the new government is tied solely to Darfur or the RSF.

“Our government is not for Darfur alone, nor for the RSF or any single region,” he said. “It represents all of Sudan—from north to south, east to west. We have drafted a constitution that guarantees equal rights for all, signed by individuals and entities from across the country. The new government will be responsible for rebuilding the state and delivering essential services, including education, healthcare, and security.”

Local and Regional Concerns

Despite strong opposition to a parallel government from neighboring states, as well as international and regional organizations—including the United Nations and IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority on Development)—Idris remains confident that these concerns will dissipate once the government takes shape.

“People have a right to be worried,” he admitted. “But once they see our government in action, they will understand that we stand for unity, peace, and stability—not the opposite.”

International Recognition: A Secondary Concern

Idris dismissed concerns over whether the new government would gain international recognition.

“This is not something that worries us,” he said. “We have already engaged with countries like Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Chad, where we have encountered sympathy for our cause. These nations have a vested interest in Sudan’s stability. In Uganda, we were received by President Yoweri Museveni himself, and in Kenya, President William Ruto welcomed us with open arms.”

The Failure of the Old State Model

According to Idris, Sudan’s traditional state structure has failed and is no longer viable.

“The world is changing around us,” he observed. “Lebanon has entered a new era, and Syria has moved past its oppressive old regime. The old political systems have no future. Since Sudan’s independence in 1956, no government has succeeded in establishing a stable, unified national state. Our history is marked by conflict and instability. That is why, during our meetings in Nairobi, we emphasized the need for a democratic, secular, and decentralized state that protects the rights of all citizens, regardless of their regional or ethnic background.”

A Role for the US in Ending the War

Idris believes the United States can play a decisive role in resolving the Sudanese conflict.

“Washington was heavily involved from the beginning of the war in 2023,” he said. “President Joe Biden’s administration made significant efforts to help Sudan, though it was unable to stop the war. We hope that the new US administration under Donald Trump will take a more effective approach, using a mix of incentives and pressure on all parties to achieve peace. We are open to working with anyone who can help resolve the crisis. Our government is a government of peace, and we are ready to engage with all stakeholders.”

Protecting Civilians from Airstrikes

Idris stressed that any legitimate government must prioritize civilian protection.

“A government that does not protect its citizens has no value,” he asserted. “We will appoint a defense minister whose primary mission will be to develop defensive strategies aimed at safeguarding civilians by all possible means. Additionally, we are working to establish the nucleus of a new national army, drawing from our allied forces, including the RSF, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, the Sudan Liberation Movement-Transitional Council, and other armed factions. A unified Joint Chiefs of Staff will be formed, and after the war ends, this force will serve as the foundation for a restructured national army dedicated solely to border protection and internal security—completely detached from politics.”

“There will no longer be two separate armies,” Idris declared. “There will be one unified military.”

Currency and Travel Documents

Idris confirmed that the new government will introduce its own currency, passports, and travel documents.

“The currency issue was a major factor in our decision to establish this government,” he said. “In many parts of Sudan, people rely on bartering because the Port Sudan government has drained cash supplies from areas outside its control. As a result, goods like salt, sugar, and wheat are traded in lieu of money. In some regions, cash is virtually nonexistent, making daily life incredibly difficult.”

When Will the New Government Be Announced?

Idris revealed that intensive consultations are underway to finalize the launch date.

“We expect to announce the new government within a month, from inside Sudan,” he said. “We have several options for where the announcement will take place, and we will reveal the location in the coming days.”

Participation in Future Negotiations

As for potential peace talks, Idris made it clear: “We are open to any serious and responsible initiative—whether local, regional, or international—but we will only engage in negotiations as the legitimate government of Sudan, a government of peace.”