Sisi to Discuss GERD During African-US Summit

Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and US President Joe Biden during COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (Egyptian Presidency)
Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and US President Joe Biden during COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (Egyptian Presidency)
TT
20

Sisi to Discuss GERD During African-US Summit

Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and US President Joe Biden during COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (Egyptian Presidency)
Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi and US President Joe Biden during COP27 in Sharm el-Sheikh (Egyptian Presidency)

The African-US summit will begin Tuesday within the framework of Washington's newly announced strategy to form a "real partnership" with the African continent.

US President Joe Biden will host the summit between Dec. 13 and 15, with 49 African leaders and heads of state participating.

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) is on the summit's agenda, and the dispute between Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia stands out as one of the critical issues.

An Egyptian source confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat that President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, who would head the Egyptian delegation at the summit, intends to raise the issue strongly in light of Cairo's firm position on the "existential" issue.

The source indicated that the issue requires a legally binding agreement to fill and operate the dam guaranteeing Egypt's water security under the principles of international law.

However, observers told Asharq Al-Awsat it was not possible to "create a breakthrough" in the issue amid the "expected" absence of Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed.

They also explained that the Biden administration refuses to mediate directly to resolve the conflict and would only support the "faltering" efforts of the African Union (AU).

Ethiopia is in dispute with Egypt and Sudan over the dam, which has been under construction on the main tributary of the Nile since 2011.

Cairo said the dam threatens its water rights, calling for a "binding legal agreement," and Khartoum is weary of its environmental and economic damage.

Since April 2021, negotiations have faltered between the three countries, which prompted Egypt to protest at the UN Security Council, urging it to pressure Ethiopia through international partners to accept an agreement that satisfies all parties.

Head of the "Ethiopian Institute for Popular Diplomacy" in Sweden, Yassin Ahmed Baaqai, said President Sahle-Work Zewde will chair Ethiopia's delegation to the summit as Abiy Ahmed was not invited, citing "political considerations."

Baaqai considered Abiy Ahmed's absence, along with Sudan's exclusion after its AU membership suspension, an indication of "weak handling" of the GERD issue at the expense of other problems and challenges that unite African countries, such as the food and energy crisis and terrorism.

The expert told Asharq Al-Awsat he does not expect a significant breakthrough, noting that the summit would only include feeble attempts on its sidelines to bring views together amid the Biden administration's support for the Union's sponsorship of the file and its encouragement of tripartite negotiations.

In July, Biden stressed, after the Jeddah Summit for Security and Development, the "imperative of concluding an agreement on the filling and operation of the GERD without further delay," reiterating the importance of "forging a diplomatic resolution that would achieve the interests of all parties and contribute to a more peaceful and prosperous region."

The former Egyptian Foreign Minister, Ambassador Mohamed al-Orabi, considered the negotiations to require "real Ethiopian political will."

The diplomat told Asharq Al-Awsat that Addis Ababa has publicly announced its desire to resume negotiations, while in reality, it obstructs all settlement efforts, referring to its unilateral measures.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.