The Iranian Feminist Movement... Why and How?

High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
TT

The Iranian Feminist Movement... Why and How?

High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)
High school students remove the veil and raise the victory sign in Tehran last October (Twitter)

In September, a girl named Mahsa was murdered by government agents. Her death was like throwing a lit match into a petrol tank. People took to the streets in more than a hundred Iranian cities and demanded the overthrow of the Islamic Republic.

Did all the protesters know Mahsa? No, she was not a well-known figure for her murder to cause such outrage.

The people’s anger was triggered by the many demands that had not been met for years. Their needs had been met with imprisonment and bullets. In the past three decades, some have been calling for reforms within the government, but since demands have gone unachieved, they uniformly chose to try overthrowing the regime this time.

The Origins of the Movement

Iranian women were the pioneers of this movement. Their discontent with the government began in the first month of the revolution when Khomeini ordered making the hijab compulsory - although the implementation of the mandatory hijab took nearly a year, it formed the seeds of the feminist movement in 2022.

In the early years of the revolution, women were alone. Civil society, parties, political groups, and men did not join them. The passage of time, however, has proven that oppression and discrimination in society are like a “virus.” If it is not fought at the beginning, it will infect others.

Massive embezzlement, partisan gangs, discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities, strict censorship, lack of freedom of expression, rampant human rights violations, and a huge class gap made Iranian men realize their mistake and motivated them to make up for ignoring gender discrimination…This time, like a few years ago, Iranian men stood with women and strengthened the voice of the movement.

Differences Between the Current Movement, Previous Protests

Large-scale protests that took place in Iran in the past 43 years were mainly “demand protests.” In 2009, Iranians protested fraud in presidential elections. At least 130 people were killed, and several people were executed.

Protests also erupted in 2019 over a hike in petrol prices. Those demonstrations resulted in the death of at least 1,500 people.

But this time around, the people’s demands are different than ever before. They are targeting the basis of government and demanding the overthrow of an oppressive regime.

Previous protests did not last more than a week as they were silenced by government repression. Discontented people left the streets and returned to their homes.

The style of people’s protests in Iran has changed. In contrast to the past, people did not gather in one place or one city. Rather, they took to the streets on a large scale and dispersed in different places, protesting and chanting slogans.

This called for repressive forces to be sent everywhere. As a result, the troops became weak and exhausted, forcing the government to recruit several outworkers in exchange for payments.

Similarities between previous protests and demonstrations now included people not having a single demand and not resisting oppression uniformly.

This time, however, under the guidance of Iranian legal experts, protesters are using the “right of self-defense” to fend off the onslaught of the oppressive forces.

Nevertheless, people are not armed. They continue to hit and run with sticks and stones only. As a result, several members of the suppression force were injured.

Moreover, if security officers wanted to arrest a protester, other demonstrators would attack authorities to prevent the detention of their comrades. Therefore, most arrests take place past midnight or by storming the houses of demonstrators.

The Outcomes of the 2022 Protests?

The September 2022 protests are the “beginning” of the “end” of the Islamic Republic and will lead to the fall of the regime in Iran. But let us not forget that the “fall” is a process that must take its course.

For this reason, protests are normal to fade on some days and be more severe and accelerate on others. However, the situation will undoubtedly return to normal once the regime is overthrown.

What is important is what kind of government the people want after the regime’s fall. People’s desires can be well understood from the slogans they choose. The demonstrators chanted with one heart and one voice, “Woman, Life, Freedom.”

This motto has two sides: its negative side is the denial of the religious tyranny ruling Iran.

In Iran, authorities believe their own interpretation of religion and do not tolerate any other method or religion. Rather, it is the enemy of “freedom of religion and belief.” On this basis, it interferes with all people’s personal and family affairs and even with their way of worship. Many have been arrested or executed for this reason.

The positive aspect of the slogan is that it calls for the establishment of a democratic and secular state. Only in such a government can the slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” be realized.

In such a state, there is no discrimination because the people decide their own destiny through the free election of representatives. No one is punished for their religious beliefs, and there is no vast difference in class division.

Women will have an equal share of freedom as men, and the human dignity of all will be recognized.

The Price of Reaching Dreamland

The Iranian people know that freedom and democracy have a price. These principles will only be achieved if the nation is willing to pay the price, and the Iranian people have shown that they can bear the cost of democracy.

Over the past 43 years, many Iranian people have lost their lives for opposing the rulers.

The death toll in multiple protests is unknown. Because the government never releases statistics. Statistics are made public only through informing the families, and after verification by human rights institutions.

In recent protests, at least 510 people have been killed by the regime, at least 68 of them minors, prompting UNICEF, on November 8, to protest this unbridled violence.

The exact number of those arrested is also unknown, but I firmly declare that more than 19,000 people have been arrested. At least 300 of them are high school students.

Due to overcrowded prisons and the lack of available space, the detainees are kept in unsanitary and irregular conditions in barracks and government buildings that have been vacated for this purpose.

So far, the trial of several detainees has begun, and 18 people have been sentenced to death, and two of them have been executed.

One of the people on death row is Hamid Ghareh Hassanlou, a well-known physician who built several schools in deprived areas and served in the Iran-Iraq war for six years.

Hassanlou was arrested at his home and tortured to the point where his rib bone was broken. Because he was not treated in time, his lung was punctured.

At the hospital, he was informed that the death sentence had been issued against him. This doctor’s wife, a radiologist, was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Another person was arrested and sentenced to death for singing some rap songs.

Government violence has even spilled over into hospitals, where government officials identify and detain injured people at protest rallies. If the medical staff resists, they are arrested as well.

In one case, tear gas was fired in the hospital yard.

On December 17, the body of a young female doctor named Aida was found. Traces of torture were visible on her corpse.

According to her friends and colleagues, she used to go to their homes and treat wounded people who did not want to go to medical facilities. Now it is widely believed, given the government’s record, that she was tortured and then killed by government agents.

All this is a small summary of the suffering of my bereaved country. The important point is that we all believe in the light that we will reach at the end of the tunnel of terror of the Islamic Republic, and then we will live with our neighbors in kindness and tranquility.



Landfill Collapse Kills 30 in Guinea

Residents and rescuers use an excavator to search for bodies after a landslide struck the Dar es Salaam dumpsite overnight in Conakry on August 23, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
Residents and rescuers use an excavator to search for bodies after a landslide struck the Dar es Salaam dumpsite overnight in Conakry on August 23, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
TT

Landfill Collapse Kills 30 in Guinea

Residents and rescuers use an excavator to search for bodies after a landslide struck the Dar es Salaam dumpsite overnight in Conakry on August 23, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
Residents and rescuers use an excavator to search for bodies after a landslide struck the Dar es Salaam dumpsite overnight in Conakry on August 23, 2026. (Photo by AFP)

Thirty people died in Guinea's capital Conakry on Sunday when a mound of rubbish in a landfill collapsed before dawn onto neighboring homes following heavy rains, the government said.

Six others were seriously injured in the 2:00 am (0200 GMT) incident in the Bbessia district's Dar-es-salam neighborhood on the capital's outskirts, a government statement said.

Neighborhood leader Lancine Sylla had previously told AFP that he feared a heavy toll.

"We have pulled out 18 bodies that were taken to the morgue," he told AFP.

Guinea's minister for territorial administration Djenabou Toure went to the scene of the accident, where AFP photographers saw excavators take part in a search-and-rescue operation through the collapsed landfill under the gaze of a crowd of onlookers.

In recent days, the government had ordered the expulsion of people and safety measures around the site because of fears of a collapse.


French Ambassador to Asharq Al-Awsat: Mohammed bin Salman’s Visit Paves Way for New Phase of Strategic Partnership

Patrick Maisonnave, French Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Patrick Maisonnave, French Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (Asharq Al-Awsat).
TT

French Ambassador to Asharq Al-Awsat: Mohammed bin Salman’s Visit Paves Way for New Phase of Strategic Partnership

Patrick Maisonnave, French Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Patrick Maisonnave, French Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (Asharq Al-Awsat).

A senior French official stressed that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s visit to France on Sunday means, in short, that Riyadh and Paris are entering a new phase of a genuine strategic partnership. He said the visit will address diplomacy, security, defense, investment, energy, culture, technology, and education.

Patrick Maisonnave, the French ambassador to Saudi Arabia, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the momentum is now being further strengthened through the visit of Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman to France and the first meeting of the French-Saudi Strategic Partnership Council.

According to Maisonnave, the council is particularly important because it provides a permanent institutional framework for this political ambition, allowing both countries to set priorities, measure progress, and develop long-term cooperation across the main pillars of the relationship.

He added that as the two countries seek to keep pace with profound geopolitical, economic, and technological changes, Mohammed bin Salman’s visit demonstrates a shared determination to move from a very strong bilateral partnership to a comprehensive strategic partnership.

He continued by saying that the readiness of the two leaderships to work together is not limited to bilateral issues, but also extends to regional stability, global challenges, and the major transformations shaping their societies, as the partnership enters a new phase with this visit.

He explained that the transformation Saudi Arabia is undergoing under Vision 2030, together with France’s strengths in sectors such as energy, infrastructure, culture, innovation, artificial intelligence, education, and creative industries, is creating new areas for convergence.

He stressed that the strategic dimension of the partnership lies precisely in this development, moving from a relationship based on strong cooperation to one increasingly grounded in shared objectives, long-term planning, and joint initiatives.

A Convergence Resilient to Challenges

Maisonnave affirmed that Riyadh and Paris have a well-established partnership and mutual trust that enable them to overcome the geopolitical challenges facing the region. He noted that the bilateral convergence translates into close coordination on the region’s most prominent crises.

He added that Paris and Riyadh are working together to support a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians and create the necessary political conditions for lasting peace. The two countries also share an interest in Yemen’s stability and in protecting freedom of navigation and the security of strategic maritime routes.

According to Maisonnave, the two countries support efforts to end the devastating war in Sudan and preserve the country’s unity and institutions. They also support Syria’s sovereignty, unity, and recovery, as well as the establishment of a stronger Lebanese state capable of exercising its authority, while reducing external interference and the influence of non-state armed groups.

He continued by saying that France and Saudi Arabia naturally have their own interests and perspectives, but have developed the ability to engage in frank dialogue, particularly during periods of regional tension and profound international changes. This has enabled the relationship not only to endure, but also to continually reinvent itself.

Ambassador Maisonnave said the distinctive nature of the Saudi-French relationship lies in its rare combination of historical depth, political trust, and a shared ability to look to the future. Over the past century, he explained, the two countries have built a relationship based on mutual respect, continuous dialogue, and, most importantly, strategic autonomy.

He added that the relationship is no longer defined solely by its history or traditional areas of cooperation. Instead, it is increasingly focused on what the two countries can build together over the coming decades. French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to Saudi Arabia in December 2024 was a landmark moment that gave new political momentum to bilateral relations.

He attributed the resilience of bilateral relations since their establishment in 1926 to the fact that their strength lies in a century of accumulated trust, sustained political engagement at the highest levels, and a determination to adapt the partnership to each new historical period, despite some turning points along the way.

Maisonnave added that since diplomatic relations were established in 1926, France and Saudi Arabia have steadily expanded the scope of their cooperation. The relationship has accompanied the transformation of the Kingdom itself while responding at the same time to successive regional and international challenges. After 100 years, he said, the relationship is broader and deeper than at any previous stage in its history.

He continued by saying that this continuity is particularly evident today in diplomatic cooperation. At a time when the Middle East is going through one of its most significant periods of transformation, France and Saudi Arabia share a fundamental objective: preventing instability from becoming permanent and restoring the priority of diplomacy, state sovereignty, and international law.

Of particular importance, according to Maisonnave, is that this diplomatic coordination is developing alongside an equally deep economic and societal partnership. France is accompanying the transformation taking place in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030 in areas ranging from investment and energy to culture, tourism, technology, education, and human capital development.

In his view, this gives the relationship an unprecedented scope, noting that strategic dialogue at the highest political levels is reinforced by growing ties between the two countries’ economies, institutions, and societies.

He also noted that the centenary of the establishment of diplomatic relations represents more than a commemoration of the past. It symbolizes the transition from one chapter to another in the history of the relationship.

Maisonnave explained that the first 100 years established and laid the foundations for a relationship based on trust. He stressed that the next 100 years must build on this legacy, making France and Saudi Arabia not merely partners in a changing world, but partners in shaping the future.


Zelensky Rejects Wartime Elections, Says Would 'Split' Ukraine

(FILES) Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives to attend a meeting with Serbian President at the Palace of Serbia, in Belgrade on August 8, 2026. (Photo by Andrej ISAKOVIC / AFP)
(FILES) Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives to attend a meeting with Serbian President at the Palace of Serbia, in Belgrade on August 8, 2026. (Photo by Andrej ISAKOVIC / AFP)
TT

Zelensky Rejects Wartime Elections, Says Would 'Split' Ukraine

(FILES) Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives to attend a meeting with Serbian President at the Palace of Serbia, in Belgrade on August 8, 2026. (Photo by Andrej ISAKOVIC / AFP)
(FILES) Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives to attend a meeting with Serbian President at the Palace of Serbia, in Belgrade on August 8, 2026. (Photo by Andrej ISAKOVIC / AFP)

President Volodymyr Zelensky said in remarks made public Sunday that it would be too dangerous for Ukraine to hold an election while it fights Russia's invasion, after a call by his former defense minister to organize a vote.

"I believe that in a war like this, elections as such are a huge risk. Elections right now are a tsunami for the country that will split Ukraine," Zelensky said in the comments.

Ukraine has suspended elections under martial law, a measure still widely supported by the population as the country focuses on fighting off Russian forces.

"If we want to destroy the country, then we can move in the direction of elections during these times of war," the 48-year-old leader added.

He held a briefing with a group of journalists including AFP on Saturday, the first in months amid several political crises.

The latest upheaval saw thousands take to the streets after Zelensky fired his defense minister, Mykhailo Fedorov.

The ousted Fedorov this week made a surprise call to find a way to organize a vote - but without offering a roadmap, and prompting even some of his supporters to distance themselves from him.

Experts have cited a flurry of obstacles, including how soldiers, millions of Ukrainian refugees and people from occupied territories would vote, as well as disinformation threats from Russia.

Only 15 percent of Ukrainians believe elections should be held before the end of hostilities, according to a poll by the Kyiv Institute of Sociology.

Zelensky made numerous jab at his opponent during the briefing.

"I believe he is going himself -- or is being pushed - toward wrong things," Zelensky said of Fedorov.

The former minister had pushed for reforms but clashed with the military's command and their traditionally stiff approach.

The public initially took his side and pushed for the dismissal of commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky.

Zelensky said people had the right to protest but warned against "disrespectful" attitudes to military people.

"Since when has marketing started to outweigh the people who are giving their lives?" he said.

After a political crisis that had weakened him, Zelensky was able to cast himself as a rampart against division.

"I believe that society and soldiers must not be divided," he said, "We must acknowledge that there is this risk -- that there may be movement in that direction, toward dangerous developments."