Lebanese Officials Remember Hussein Husseini’s Wisdom, Moderate Stances 

MP Hussein al-Husseini, a former parliament speaker waves his hand as he leaves the parliament building in Beirut, Lebanon, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008. (AP)
MP Hussein al-Husseini, a former parliament speaker waves his hand as he leaves the parliament building in Beirut, Lebanon, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008. (AP)
TT
20

Lebanese Officials Remember Hussein Husseini’s Wisdom, Moderate Stances 

MP Hussein al-Husseini, a former parliament speaker waves his hand as he leaves the parliament building in Beirut, Lebanon, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008. (AP)
MP Hussein al-Husseini, a former parliament speaker waves his hand as he leaves the parliament building in Beirut, Lebanon, Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008. (AP)

The death of Lebanese former parliament Speaker Hussein al-Husseini was an occasion for officials to reiterate their commitment to the 1989 Taif Accord that helped end Lebanon’s 15-year civil war. 

Husseini was known as the “godfather” of the accord that ended the 1975-90 conflict. 

He died on Wednesday at 86 after suffering from a strong flu. He was admitted to Beirut’s American University Medical Center on January 3, the state-run National News Agency said. NNA added that Husseini remained in the intensive care unit until his death. 

Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati declared a three-day mourning period in the crisis-hit Lebanon while parliament Speaker Nabih Berri postponed a session that was scheduled to take place on Thursday to elect a new president. The elections will be held on January 19. 

Berri remembered Husseini as one of Lebanon’s “greats”, who dedicated his life “to defending the nation and its people, unity, and national and popular identity.” 

Mikari said Lebanon lost in Husseini a “purely national and constitutional figure”. 

“With his passing, we close a bright chapter of distinguished political and parliamentary work,” he added. 

He said Husseini left a mark on parliamentary work, punctuating his long career with landmark moments. 

He highlighted Husseini’s pioneering role at the Taif conference and credited him in approving the national pact that ended the civil war. 

Former Prime Minister Fuad Siniora underscored Husseini’s role in the Taif Accord, as well as his “defense of Lebanon as a nation of coexistence between Muslims and Christians.” 

“No doubt the Lebanese people, who are enduring critical conditions on the national and constitutional levels amid the control of unauthorized weapons over the state and national life, will miss Husseini and feel his absence,” he said. 

He called for following “Husseini’s path, which he never veered away from, in order to protect and consolidate the national pact that was agreed at Taif.” 

By committing to this path, “Lebanon can again return to being a free, Arab, independent and prosperous nation for all of its people,” he stressed. 

Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdullatif Derian said Lebanon and the Arab world lost a “major symbol and political player.” 

Husseini left his mark in history and “honorable stances at parliament, both as speaker and lawmaker,” he added. 

The Higher Islamic Shiite Council said Husseini leaves behind a long career that is marked by national and Islamic stances that championed the causes of the nation and ummah. 

It noted his role in forming the Amal movement, which is now headed by Berri, and in confronting war and strife between the Lebanese people. 

It described him as a “man of dialogue and openness and cooperation between the Lebanese people, who worked tirelessly to fortify civil peace.” 

Husseini will be remembered for his moderate stances and patriotism. His name will forever to linked to the Taif accord that helped end the civil war and strife and approve the constitution. 



US Seeks to Persuade Lebanon to Start Talks with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
TT
20

US Seeks to Persuade Lebanon to Start Talks with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)

Israel’s response to the launch of two unidentified rockets marks a shift as it coincides with the planned return of US Deputy Special Envoy for the Middle East Morgan Ortagus to Beirut.

In her second visit, Ortagus aims to persuade Lebanon’s government to engage in diplomatic negotiations with Tel Aviv.

The proposed talks would involve three working groups tasked with securing the release of Lebanese detainees, overseeing Israel’s withdrawal from remaining occupied points, and delineating borders in accordance with the 1949 armistice agreement.

The launch of two rockets marks the second such incident in less than a week.

The first attack took place last Saturday, targeting the Israeli settlement of Metula with three rockets, which were intercepted and brought down by Israel near the Blue Line.

The latest rocket fire coincided with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun’s meeting with his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron in Paris, in what appeared to be a message that the Lebanese army’s efforts to assert state authority over all national territory were insufficient—particularly as Ortagus prepares for her return to Beirut.

The identity of those behind the rocket launches remains unclear, as Hezbollah has repeatedly denied any involvement.

Sources familiar with the security meeting chaired by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who was in contact with Aoun during his talks with Macron, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the meeting closely examined the question of who was responsible for the attacks.

According to the sources, the assessment within the expanded security meeting was that Hezbollah had no interest in launching the rockets.

Discussions among security officials, however, also ruled out Palestinian factions, as the rockets were fired from an area under Hezbollah’s influence.

Hezbollah, the sources noted, is sensitive to the prevailing mood among Lebanon’s Shiite community, which seeks stability in the south—a goal that remains elusive while the war continues.

The group is wary of alienating its support base and has refrained from responding to Israeli ceasefire violations, despite the embarrassment this causes within its ranks.

Currently, Hezbollah is aligned with the Lebanese government’s diplomatic efforts to pressure Israel into withdrawing from southern Lebanon, the sources said. President Aoun recently affirmed that the group is cooperating with the Lebanese army south of the Litani River.

If the ongoing military intelligence investigation determines that neither Hezbollah nor any other local actor was involved in the rocket launches, questions may arise over whether Israel itself was behind the attack, given its history of ceasefire violations.

Israel, the sources added, has the most to gain from undermining the US-French-brokered ceasefire agreement.

Hezbollah, meanwhile, has little to gain from escalating tensions, particularly as Lebanon enters Eid al-Fitr and Easter—holidays that traditionally bring an influx of expatriates and provide a much-needed economic boost.

The sources also questioned whether Israel, with its extensive surveillance capabilities, was truly unable to detect and prevent the launch of the two 107mm rockets.

They pointed out that Israel maintains close aerial monitoring over southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, and the Lebanese-Syrian border, frequently tracking and assassinating Hezbollah operatives.

It has previously targeted the group’s military facilities but did not strike the site from which the rockets were launched, nor the platform used in the attack. Instead, Israel imposed a tit-for-tat equation, equating Kiryat Shmona with Beirut’s southern suburbs—just as it had earlier linked Metula to the Lebanese capital.

The sources did not rule out the possibility that Israel orchestrated the attack through its agents—an angle security services continue to investigate.

If no Lebanese group is found responsible, the sources suggested, the incident could be linked to internal divisions within Hezbollah, where some elements advocate military responses to Israeli violations, while others back the government’s diplomatic approach.

Israel’s response, they added, fits within broader efforts to pressure Lebanon into direct negotiations—a move openly supported by Washington, as conveyed through Ortagus.

The timing of the rocket launch, coinciding with the Aoun-Macron meeting, was seen as an attempt to push France toward aligning with the US position, rather than maintaining its current stance, which is more sympathetic to Lebanon’s perspective.

Ahead of Ortagus’s visit, Aoun outlined Lebanon’s approach to the US proposal from Paris, stressing that any negotiations must distinguish between three separate issues: the release of Lebanese detainees, Israel’s withdrawal from occupied points, and border demarcation under internationally recognized diplomatic protocols—without leading to normalization with Israel or forcing Lebanon into a “war or negotiations” scenario dictated by Tel Aviv.