US Envoy Visits Ramallah, Palestinians Demand ‘Urgent Solution’

A photo published by Hussein al-Sheikh on his Twitter account shows his meeting with the US Envoy
A photo published by Hussein al-Sheikh on his Twitter account shows his meeting with the US Envoy
TT

US Envoy Visits Ramallah, Palestinians Demand ‘Urgent Solution’

A photo published by Hussein al-Sheikh on his Twitter account shows his meeting with the US Envoy
A photo published by Hussein al-Sheikh on his Twitter account shows his meeting with the US Envoy

Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh briefed the US envoy for Palestinian and Israeli affairs, Hady Amr, on the violations and unilateral measures taken by the new extremist Israeli government against the Palestinians.

Amr also met in Ramallah with PLO Secretary-General Hussein al-Sheikh, who said he stressed the need for a political solution that preserves the two-state solution in line with international legitimacy.

Sheikh warned of the Israeli government’s “unilateral measures and daily attacks which destroy the efforts towards a two-state solution and harm security and stability.”

“The US administration is required to move urgently to put an end to the unilateral Israeli measures and threats that undermine the Palestinian Authority and systematically end the possibility of establishing a Palestinian state,” Shtayyeh told the US envoy on Thursday in Ramallah.

He stressed that the upcoming visit of US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to the region should carry a message of hope for the Palestinian people and a clear message to the Israeli government that it should stop the violations and unilateral measures and oblige it to respect international law and signed agreements.

The meetings of Shtayyeh and al-Sheikh with Amr coincide with a wave of Palestinian anger over the Israeli sanctions imposed on the Palestinian Authority.

US State Department spokesman Ned Price on Monday condemned the sanctions approved by the Israeli government.

Price referred to the sanctions as a “unilateral response” that will “exacerbate tensions”.

“This is part of the reason why we’ve opposed the Palestinian move when it comes to the ICJ, knowing that it would potentially only serve to increase tensions,” Price said in response to a question during the daily press briefing.

“We believe the Palestinian effort at the UN was counterproductive, only taking the parties further away from the objective of a negotiated two-state solution.”

Moreover, Likud MK Yuli Edelstein told US Ambassador to Israel Tom Nides on Wednesday that the new Israeli government plans to expand settlements in the West Bank, despite the Biden administration’s objections.

“I expressed to the ambassador my clear position regarding the need for construction in the areas of [Jewish] settlement in Judea and Samaria,” Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chair Edelstein said.

Edelstein added: “I lived for 28 years in Gush Etzion. I know that life doesn't stop; the families there are developing and it's impossible to put their lives on hold. Construction should continue."

Edelstein's standpoint endorses the guiding principles of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government stating that the Jewish people have “an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,” including the West Bank.

Likud signed coalition agreements pledging to expand Israeli settlements and advance annexation of large parts of the West Bank.

On Tuesday, Nides told the Kan public broadcaster that Netanyahu understands the US stance in favor of “keep[ing] a vision of a two-state solution alive” as well as its opposition to “legalizing outposts and massive settlement expansion.”



Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
TT

Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).

Discussions are underway on the role of the Lebanese army in maintaining security in South Lebanon amid rising optimism about a potential ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah and the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701

As part of these preparations, the Lebanese government has begun strengthening the army by recruiting 1,500 new soldiers out of the 6,000 needed, aligning with the outcomes of the Paris Conference held on October 23, which allocated 200 million euros to support the military institution, from a broader package intended to help the Lebanese people during the Israel-Hezbollah war.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, a security official highlighted that the army currently has 4,500 personnel stationed south of the Litani River but requires additional manpower.

The unidentified official noted, however, that any effective deployment would require a political decision and government support. “The Lebanese military will implement Resolution 1701 as is, with no intention of clashing with any party. However, if Israel violates Lebanese sovereignty, the army is fully prepared to respond,” he said.

Although Hezbollah opposes withdrawing from south of the Litani and handing over border security duties to the Lebanese military and UNIFIL, claiming the army lacks the capabilities to defend against Israeli aggression, the security source clarified that the military has been authorized to repel any attacks but will avoid initiating conflict. The army’s expanded deployment depends on a political decision, which, once made, will see the military act without hesitation to uphold Lebanese sovereignty.

While military preparedness is essential, Brigadier General Wehbeh Qatisha argues that Lebanon’s security requires more than just troops or advanced weaponry at the border. The presence of the Lebanese military as a representative of the Lebanese state is also a significant deterrent. He pointed out that prior to 1970, Israel refrained from attacking Lebanon, despite a much smaller army. However, he cautioned that even with a substantial deployment today, the persistence of Hezbollah’s military presence would continue to undermine Lebanon’s stability and security.

Since the 1969 Cairo Agreement, which allowed the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to launch operations against Israel from southern Lebanon, the Lebanese army has been restricted in its ability to enforce security along the border. After the PLO’s departure in 1982, Hezbollah took over military operations in the South. Even after the 2006 war and the adoption of Resolution 1701, which called for the Lebanese military and UNIFIL to secure the border, Hezbollah retained its armed presence and continued to conduct exercises simulating conflict with Israel. The latter violated the international resolution thousands of times, until the last war broke out against the background of turning southern Lebanon into a front supporting Gaza.

Qatisha emphasized that the path to stability lies in comprehensive implementation of international resolutions, particularly 1701 and 1559, and restricting arms to the Lebanese army. He argued that achieving balanced deterrence requires not only military force but also a commitment to diplomacy and international support.