Israel Calls on Germany to Take Decisive Action against Iran

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen and his German counterpart, Annalena Baerbock (dpa)
Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen and his German counterpart, Annalena Baerbock (dpa)
TT

Israel Calls on Germany to Take Decisive Action against Iran

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen and his German counterpart, Annalena Baerbock (dpa)
Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen and his German counterpart, Annalena Baerbock (dpa)

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen has sought to convince his German counterpart, Annalena Baerbock, in Berlin to tighten sanctions against Iran, sending a strong message before the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency meeting  (IAEA).

Earlier, Bloomberg published a report stating that international inspectors in Iran detected enriched uranium to 84 percent, just six percent below what is needed for a weapon.

The agency did not deny or confirm the report but only said it was trying to clarify the issue from Iran.

Iran strongly denied enriching uranium at such a high rate. It invited the IAEA Secretary-General, Rafael Grossi, to visit Iran before the meeting of the Board of Governors next Monday.

Iran's nuclear activities overshadowed Cohen's meeting with Baerbock in Berlin, where the German Foreign Minister expressed concern over Iran's "continued nuclear escalation."

"There is no plausible civilian justification for such a high enrichment level. Iran must not acquire a nuclear bomb. That is our common position, which is the objective of our diplomatic endeavors," she said.

Baerbock indicated that the Iranian regime is no longer just a regional problem, accusing it of threatening stability and security in the Middle East.

The top diplomat confirmed that Germany is consulting with other European countries and the US on dealing with reports that Iran has increased uranium enrichment. She was in Geneva on Monday and participated in meetings at the UN without holding talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian.

Baerbock asserted it was necessary to find a diplomatic solution because any alternative would be devastating.

At a joint press conference, Cohen said that Western countries must act now to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, which would be possible by re-imposing the sanctions using the "snapback" system.

Cohen called on Western countries to increase diplomatic pressure on Iran within the IAEA, noting that the Iranian regime is doing everything possible to obtain a nuclear weapon.

He described the Iranian regime as threatening the region, Europe, and the world.

Cohen called on Germany to classify the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization within Germany and at the level of the European Union.

Last week, European officials said there are no legal grounds yet to classify the IRGC as a terrorist organization.

Meanwhile, the Iranian FM responded from Geneva to the increasing pressure on his country over its nuclear program.

Speaking at the Conference on Disarmament High-Level Segment, Amirabdollahian said Iran warned against any possible "unwise decision" by the IAEA Board of Governors' upcoming meeting in March. He indicated that Iran reserves its right to give an appropriate response.

Amirabdollahian claimed his country received messages from the US stating it was willing to return to the nuclear agreement.

He indicated that Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani received a message from Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein after his return from Washington, stating that the US administration was ready to agree on the nuclear deal and pursue the talks.

US State Department spokesman Ned Price denied the matter and accused the Iranian foreign minister of promoting lies.

Price said that Washington did not send any messages to Tehran and that the issue of returning to the nuclear agreement has not been on the table for months.

Senior European sources told Asharq Al-Awsat in Munich that now is not the right time to return to the nuclear deal due to Iran's suppression of the protests, saying Western countries were now focused on severing Iran's growing military relationship with Russia.

For two days in Geneva, Amirabdollahian tried to portray the protests in Iran as "acts of terrorism" in a speech before the Human Rights Council.

He denied that the Iranian regime was practicing repression and accused Persian media in London and Washington of inciting terrorism.

Despite the meetings that Amirabdollahian held in Geneva, they showed the increasing isolation of the Iranian regime since the start of suppressing the protests, condemned by most Western speakers before the Human Rights Council.

The Iranian FM met with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and foreign ministers of Finland and Belgium.

Belgium’s FM said she discussed the issue of the Belgian detainee in Iran and called for his release.



Harris, Trump Offer Starkly Different Visions on Climate Change and Energy

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
TT

Harris, Trump Offer Starkly Different Visions on Climate Change and Energy

Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)
Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks during a debate, June 27, 2024, in Atlanta. (AP Photo)

As the Earth sizzled through a summer with four of the hottest days ever measured, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump have starkly different visions on how to address a changing climate while ensuring a reliable energy supply. But neither has provided many details on how they would get there.

During her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, Harris briefly mentioned climate change as she outlined “fundamental freedoms” at stake in the election, including “the freedom to breathe clean air and drink clean water and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.”

As vice president, Harris cast the tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act, President Joe Biden’s landmark climate law that was approved with only Democratic support. As a senator from California, she was an early sponsor of the Green New Deal, a sweeping series of proposals meant to swiftly move the US to fully green energy that is championed by the Democratic Party’s most progressive wing.

Trump, meanwhile, led chants of “drill, baby, drill” and pledged to dismantle the Biden administration’s “green new scam” in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention. He has vowed to boost production of fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal and repeal key parts of the 2022 climate law.

“We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far,” Trump said at the RNC, The AP reported. “We are a nation that has the opportunity to make an absolute fortune with its energy.”

‘Climate champion’ or unfair regulations? Environmental groups, who largely back Harris, call her a “proven climate champion” who will take on Big Oil and build on Biden's climate legacy, including policies that boost electric vehicles and limit planet-warming pollution from coal-fired power plants.

"We won’t go back to a climate denier in the Oval Office,'' said Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action.

Republicans counter that Biden and Harris have spent four years adopting “punishing regulations” that target American energy while lavishing generous tax credits for electric vehicles and other green priorities that cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

“This onslaught of overreaching and outrageous climate rules will shut down power plants and increase energy costs for families across the country,'' said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo. "Republicans will work to stop them and fight for solutions that protect our air and water and allow our economy to grow.”

Democrats have a clear edge on the issue. More than half of US adults say they trust Harris “a lot” or “some” when it comes to addressing climate change, according to an AP-NORC poll conducted in July. About 7 in 10 say they have “not much” trust in Trump or “none at all” when it comes to climate. Fewer than half say they lack trust in Harris.

A look at where the two candidates stand on key climate and energy issues:

Fracking and offshore drilling Harris said during her short-lived 2020 presidential campaign that she opposed offshore drilling for oil and hydraulic fracturing, an oil and gas extraction process better known as fracking.

But her campaign has clarified that she no longer supports a ban on fracking, a common drilling practice that is crucial to the economy in Pennsylvania, a key swing state and the nation’s second-largest producer of natural gas.

“As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking,'' Harris told CNN Thursday in her first major television interview as the Democratic nominee. "We can grow ... a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking.''

Kevin Book, managing director at ClearView Energy Partners, a Washington research firm, said Harris’ evolving views show she is “trying to balance climate voters and industry supporters,″ even as her campaign takes ”an adversarial stance″ with the oil and gas industry overall.

Harris and Democrats have cited new rules — authorized by the climate law — to increase royalties that oil and gas companies pay to drill or mine on public lands. She also has supported efforts to clean up old drilling sites and cap abandoned wells that often spew methane and other pollutants.

Trump, who pushed to roll back scores of environmental laws as president, says his goal is for the US to have the cheapest energy and electricity in the world. He’d increase oil drilling on public lands, offer tax breaks to oil, gas and coal producers and speed the approval of natural gas pipelines.

Electric vehicles Trump has frequently criticized tough new vehicle emissions rules imposed by Biden, incorrectly calling them an electric vehicle “mandate.″ Environmental Protection Agency rules issued this spring target tailpipe emissions from cars and trucks and encourage — but do not require — sales of new EVs to meet the new standards.

Trump has said EV manufacturing will destroy jobs in the auto industry. In recent months, however, he has softened his rhetoric, saying he’s for “a very small slice” of cars being electric.

The change comes after Tesla CEO Elon Musk “endorsed me very strongly,” Trump said at an August rally in Atlanta. Even so, industry officials expect Trump to roll back Biden’s EV push and attempt to repeal tax incentives that Trump claims benefit China.

Harris has not announced an EV plan but has strongly supported EVs as vice president. At a 2022 event in Seattle, she celebrated roughly $1 billion in federal grants to purchase about 2,500 “clean” school buses. As many as 25 million children ride the familiar yellow buses each school day, and they will have a healthier future with a cleaner fleet, Harris said.

The grants and other federal climate programs not only are aimed at “saving our children, but for them, saving our planet,″ she said.

Climate law, jobs Harris has focused on implementing the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law passed in 2021, as well as climate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided nearly $375 billion in financial incentives for electric cars, clean energy projects and manufacturing.

Under Biden and Harris, American manufacturers created more than 250,000 energy jobs last year, the Energy Department said, with clean energy accounting for more than half of those jobs.

Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, deride climate spending as a "money grab'' for environmental groups and say it will ship Americans' jobs to China and other countries while increasing energy prices at home.

“Kamala Harris cares more about climate change than about inflation,” Vance wrote in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.

Goodbye Paris? Trump, who has cast climate change as a “hoax," withdrew the US from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. He has vowed to do so again, calling the global plan to reduce carbon emissions unenforceable and a gift to China and other big polluters. Trump vows to end wind subsidies included in the climate law and eliminate regulations imposed and proposed by the Biden administration to increase the energy efficiency of lightbulbs, stoves, dishwashers and shower heads.

Harris has called the Paris Agreement crucial to address climate change and protect “our children’s future.″

The US returned to the Paris Agreement soon after Biden took office in 2021.

LNG pause After approving numerous projects to export liquefied natural gas, or LNG, the Biden administration in January paused consideration of new natural gas export terminals. The delay allows officials to review the economic and climate impacts of natural gas, a fossil fuel that emits methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

The decision aligned the Democratic president with environmentalists who fear the recent increase in LNG exports is locking in potentially catastrophic planet-warming emissions even as Biden has pledged to cut climate pollution in half by 2030.

Trump has said he would approve terminals “on my very first day back” in office.

Harris has not outlined plans for LNG exports, but analysts expect her to impose tough climate standards on export projects as part of her larger stance against large oil and gas companies.