Iraq Condemns Turkish Attack on Sulaymaniyah Airport

The Sulaymaniyah International Airport (INA)
The Sulaymaniyah International Airport (INA)
TT
20

Iraq Condemns Turkish Attack on Sulaymaniyah Airport

The Sulaymaniyah International Airport (INA)
The Sulaymaniyah International Airport (INA)

Iraq demanded an apology from Turkiye over the drone attack that targeted the Sulaymaniyah International Airport on Friday in the Kurdistan region of Iraq without causing any casualties.

President Abdul Latif Rashid condemned the blatant Turkish attacks on Iraq and its sovereignty, saying: "Turkish military operations are repeated in the Kurdistan region, the latest of which was the bombing of the Sulaymaniyah civilian airport."

The presidency issued a statement affirming there was "no legal justification" that authorizes the Turkish forces to continue "terrorizing peaceful civilians under the pretext that hostile forces are in Iraq."

"In this regard, we call on the Turkish government to take responsibility and issue an official apology," the statement said.

In an unusual statement, the First Lady of Iraq, Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed, strongly condemned Turkiye, accusing it of terrorism.

In a press conference in Sulaymaniyah, Ahmed accused "Turkish terrorism" of targeting citizens with drones and terrorist tools.

She warned that the "Turkish terrorist act" on the international airport affected the sovereignty of Iraq and Sulaymaniyah.

The leader of the Shiite Coordination Framework and the head of the Badr Organization, Hadi al-Amiri, called on Turkiye to stop its attacks on Iraqi territory.

Former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi also said the attack proved "the scale of foreign interference in Iraq."

The National Security Adviser, Qassem al-Araji, arrived in Sulaymaniyah at the head of a high-ranking security delegation under the direction of Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani.

Sources in the Turkish Defense Ministry denied any involvement in Friday's attack.

The sources told AFP that "Turkish armed forces undertook no such activity."

The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) denied that the strike was intended to target its commander-in-chief, Mazloum Abdi, who was at the airport with members of the US forces at the time of the attack.

However, Abdi condemned the attack, saying these violations continue in Iraq and Syria and have serious dimensions against the region.

He accused Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of standing behind the attack, looking for a "free victory" ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and aiming to create chaos.

Meanwhile, the sharp division between the two main Kurdish parties, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), resurfaced with the attack.

The two parties exchanged accusations over the incident a few days after Turkiye banned transit flights over its territory to Sulaymaniyah Airport.

The vice president of the Kurdistan Regional Government, Qubad Talabani, issued a scathing attack against the spokesman for the regional government, which the KDP primarily controls.

Talabani, a member of the PUK, indicated that Jotiar Adil is not a spokesman for the regional government but instead "represents only one party ... and cannot speak for the entire government."

Talabani also "strongly" condemned the attack on Sulaymaniyah Airport and considered it a dangerous escalation against the civilians.

Earlier, Adil asserted in a statement that the Regional Government is concerned about the situation in all parts of the region and is doing its best to eliminate the effects of the two administrations and serve all the citizens without obstacles or discrimination.

He accused the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan of obstructing the government and its institutions, saying that instead of helping and resolving issues through official channels, Talabani disavows responsibility and is not committed to his tenure as deputy prime minister.

For his part, the governor of Sulaymaniyah, Haval Abubakir, confirmed there were no casualties due to the air strike, calling on all political parties to "end their differences and not make Kurdistan a victim of their disputes."



Lebanon to Seek US Guarantees in Response to Proposal

US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack in Lebanon last week (Reuters)
US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack in Lebanon last week (Reuters)
TT
20

Lebanon to Seek US Guarantees in Response to Proposal

US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack in Lebanon last week (Reuters)
US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack in Lebanon last week (Reuters)

Lebanon plans to seek assurances from Washington on the implementation of any future deal involving Hezbollah’s disarmament, Lebanese political sources told Asharq Al-Awsat, ahead of a visit by US envoy to Beirut Tom Barrack early next week.

The question of US guarantees tops Lebanon’s concerns, which are shared not only by Hezbollah but also by the Lebanese state, the sources said.

The issue is central to the discussions of a tripartite Lebanese committee that includes representatives of President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, meeting regularly at the presidential palace to draft a unified response to a US proposal.

In parallel, the Quintet group - comprising the US, France, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Qatar - met at the US embassy in Beirut to discuss the situation, local media reported.

Saudi Ambassador Walid Bukhari was absent from the talks, reportedly due to travel.

According to the sources, Barrack’s visit is not solely to receive Lebanon’s response to the US proposal, but also to hold further consultations with the country’s top leaders.

The US paper outlines a phased plan prioritizing the disarmament of Hezbollah, delineation of Lebanon’s land border with Syria, and the implementation of long-delayed financial, economic, and administrative reforms.

“Lebanon views the proposal as the basis for negotiations, not a surrender document,” the sources said, noting that the primary demand to be raised will be related to binding US guarantees.

They cited the bitter experience that followed the previous ceasefire deal, after which Israel allegedly continued attacks, held on to five disputed points in southern Lebanon, and hindered the return of displaced residents—all while international aid for reconstruction failed to materialize.

“The committee is meeting almost daily,” one source said. “There is consensus on the need for an Israeli withdrawal from occupied points and an end to violations as a prerequisite for any deal. These are sovereign principles Lebanon will not abandon.”

Despite Hezbollah’s public resistance to disarmament, sources described the group’s current stance as “constructive.”

Hezbollah is said to be engaging in discussions through the state’s official channels, with party officials expressing concern over the absence of international guarantees and the risk of being sidelined politically once it gives up its arms.

“There are internal concerns that Hezbollah could be pushed out of political life, especially after talks around electoral law reforms,” one source said.

These fears are compounded by delays in international aid, reconstruction plans, and continued Israeli violations—issues that have persisted since the ceasefire in November.

On Wednesday night, Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem reiterated the party’s rejection of “any threat of force or foreign meddling,” and insisted that Hezbollah would not “surrender land or weapons to the Israeli enemy” or compromise on its rights.

Qassem also accused Israel of violating the ceasefire more than 3,700 times, while the international community “watches silently, calling only for concessions.” He said Hezbollah would continue to resist, as it has done for decades.

A senior Hezbollah lawmaker said the group remains open to cooperating on strengthening the Lebanese state and restoring its authority across the country—provided Israel withdraws from disputed southern points and halts its ongoing violations.

MP Ali Fayyad, a member of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, said the group “has consistently shown a positive willingness to cooperate in all matters related to state-building, institutional reform, and improving operational capacities to help achieve the desired stability.”

Speaking on Thursday, Fayyad added: “This includes supporting the state in extending its authority over all Lebanese territory and enabling it to carry out all its duties—chief among them the protection and defense of the people and sovereignty.” However, he warned, “None of this will be possible unless national efforts unite to achieve a key condition: Israel must withdraw from the five occupied positions it still holds, end its continued violations, and respect Lebanese sovereignty.”

Fayyad’s comments came amid a broader debate on the future of Hezbollah’s weapons and its role within the state.

Opposition lawmaker Fadi Karam from the Lebanese Forces party slammed Hezbollah’s rhetoric in a post on X.

Addressing Hezbollah’s Qassem, he wrote: “Your weapons have destroyed Lebanon and continue to give Israel an excuse to remain on our land. You’ve tied Lebanon to Iran. And now you claim that handing over your weapons to the Lebanese Army means handing them to Israel? That’s delusional and only exposes Lebanon to new wars.”

The statements reflect widening divisions over Hezbollah’s future role and the path toward national sovereignty and stability, as Lebanon grapples with US-led proposals aimed at de-escalating tensions and launching long-delayed reforms.