The Enduring Power, Magic of Football On The Radio

 Radio commentators in the stands at Wembley in 1948. Photograph: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images
Radio commentators in the stands at Wembley in 1948. Photograph: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images
TT

The Enduring Power, Magic of Football On The Radio

 Radio commentators in the stands at Wembley in 1948. Photograph: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images
Radio commentators in the stands at Wembley in 1948. Photograph: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images

It was the sound that the goal made that was particularly stirring. As Mohamed Salah’s impudent chip against Manchester City arced into the net the noise it made was noticeably different to the goals that had preceded it. The crackle from the crowd had added gasps of astonishment to mark the spectacular, plus the dizzying wow-factor to signal a flurry in quick succession, mixed in with standard goal jubilation.

For those of us who somehow managed not to be watching the game of the season live on telly (or even luckier in the flesh at Anfield), it still managed to be an extraordinary radio experience. The emotional soundscape made it obvious this was no ordinary match.

“It’s the old line that the pictures are better on radio,” smiles Rob Nothman, former producer and now a broadcasting coach. “If you have a quality commentator who can take you to the ground, describe what’s going on, give you all the information, but can also paint pictures, it’s evocative, it can grip you.”

Deciphering the nuances of live football from what you can hear over the radio was a much more useful skill a generation or so ago when there was significantly less action on television. Childhood memories of having a little speaker or headphone glued to your ear as the only means to follow a crucial match remain vivid. Radio played a huge part in how we consumed the game, a major source of information on goals, formations, news, opinion, atmosphere, you name it.

It feels particularly poignant to reflect on the power of football on the radio to honour the memory of Jimmy Armfield, whose voice, warmth and experience made him a master of this art. “He had knowledge, authority and clarity,” reflects Nothman. “When he opened his jacket he had a variety of medals – great player, great manager and he was able to bring that across as a broadcaster but in a sympathetic way. Such a lovely man, we will all miss him terribly.”

In this modern media age it’s realistic to wonder what the future holds for football on the radio. The younger fan is brought up on a diet of goals broadcast in a flash over a mobile phone, instant Twitter opinions, fan TV channels and so on. With attention spans changing to suit current social media trends, watching a full game without any distraction is more of a challenge. Kids tend to prefer highlights, shorter bursts, more action and less analysis.

Mark Chapman, the broadcaster who works across various media, is a staunch defender of the special qualities of radio. It remains, he explains, a significant way to absorb football even in this quick-refresh world. “I still maintain it is the fastest way of getting the goals,” he says. “TV is on a slight delay, and we will certainly get it before an app is updated. In this fast-moving world, radio is still the most immediate way of getting your information.

“If there is a massive news story, if you think what needs to be mobilised from a TV point of view to start covering it, that takes a fair amount of time compared to radio who can have someone on the phone within 10 seconds and straight through to a presenter. Just because radio has been around for the longest time compared to the other mediums it still to me feels very modern.

“There is an immediacy of wanting to see the goal and Twitter and so on but there is still a place for live commentary on the game, for debate. The point is listening to a piece of radio might not be the same as watching it but in some ways it can be better. This commentary might be amazing! If you get the right team radio is a much better way to consume a dreadful game.

“I will give you an example: I was driving back from the FA Cup draw in Coventry a couple of weeks ago and that Monday night game was Brighton v Crystal Palace. The 5 Live commentary team was Jonathan Pearce and Steve Claridge and it was hilarious. I couldn’t tell you much about what happened in the first half but as a listen on the radio it was great.”

This week is the anniversary of the first live broadcast of a football match over the airwaves. On 22 January 1927, from a wooden hut that resembled a garden shed erected at Highbury, the top-flight clash between Arsenal and Sheffield United was broadcast over the BBC’s radio service.

A notable detail is that debate to get permission for the radio experience at sports grounds had gone on for some time as the authorities were concerned that live broadcasts would have an impact on attendances and affect ticket sales. The very first commentator was the splendidly named Henry Blyth Thornhill Wakelam – a former rugby player.

Chapman’s love for the magic of football on the radio endures. “There is still nothing better in any of the jobs that I do than saying: ‘It’s 5 o’clock, you are listening to 5 Live and this is Sports Report. You know there are two million people in cars coming back from sport ready to listen to the headlines.” Cue that music …

The Guardian Sport



PSG Look to Pile Misery on Liverpool as Sides Meet again in Champions League

Ousmane Dembele celebrates after scoring for PSG against Liverpool at Anfield in the Champions League last season. Oli SCARFF / AFP/File
Ousmane Dembele celebrates after scoring for PSG against Liverpool at Anfield in the Champions League last season. Oli SCARFF / AFP/File
TT

PSG Look to Pile Misery on Liverpool as Sides Meet again in Champions League

Ousmane Dembele celebrates after scoring for PSG against Liverpool at Anfield in the Champions League last season. Oli SCARFF / AFP/File
Ousmane Dembele celebrates after scoring for PSG against Liverpool at Anfield in the Champions League last season. Oli SCARFF / AFP/File

When Paris Saint-Germain and Liverpool last met in the Champions League a year ago, the Anfield outfit were marching towards the Premier League title and were described as "an almost perfect team" by the French club's coach Luis Enrique.

Fast forward to this season and a formidable PSG appear clear favorites as the sides clash again in the Champions League quarter-finals, with the first leg in Paris on Wednesday.

PSG's triumph on penalties against Liverpool in the last 16 last season was pivotal on their run to a first ever Champions League title.

They had to overturn a 1-0 defeat at home in a first leg they completely dominated before holding their nerve at Anfield, and the two teams have set off on different trajectories since.

Arne Slot's side somewhat ran out of steam after that, albeit having done more than enough to get over the line in the Premier League.

This season has been a huge disappointment, however, and they return to Paris in especially downbeat mood after a chastening 4-0 defeat against Manchester City in the FA Cup quarter-finals.

- 'So tough' -

That had Slot saying his team lacked fighting spirit, while captain Virgil van Dijk suggested they had given up and admitted it would be "very difficult" for Liverpool to lift themselves against PSG.

"But we have a responsibility, not only to ourselves but especially to the fans and, if we want to make something out of this season, we have to try and do something special in the next three games," he said, with the Champions League tie taking place either side of an awkward clash with Fulham.

"The matter of fact is now, PSG are waiting for us. It will be so tough again. So we have to be ready mentally as soon as possible," Van Dijk added.

Liverpool have won just one of their last five matches and have suffered 15 defeats in this campaign.

Securing a return to Europe's top table for next season has to be the main aim now for a team currently lying fifth in the Premier League.

PSG, in contrast, have had a tricky season at times due to injuries but look like they might be returning to their very best form at the right time.

A 3-1 win over Toulouse last Friday, featuring one marvellous goal from reigning Ballon d'Or Ousmane Dembele, helped them extend their lead atop Ligue 1 to four points from nearest challengers Lens, with a game in hand.

But the Champions League is what really matters -- the French league even accepted their request to postpone this Saturday's key trip to Lens to allow them to concentrate fully on Liverpool.

"I think we have shown for a long time that we are ready, regardless of the competition, but there are obviously things we can improve," warned Luis Enrique.

Dembele is fully fit and firing, but Khvicha Kvaratskhelia was the inspiration in the last round, when PSG destroyed Chelsea 8-2 on aggregate -- Wednesday's game will be their 14th against Premier League opposition since January 2025.

- Ekitike back in Paris -

There is one obvious weakness in PSG's ranks, however -- they have not successfully replaced goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma, the hero in last season's shoot-out against Liverpool who is now at Manchester City.

Lucas Chevalier was signed as the Italian's successor but has lost his place to Matvey Safonov, the Russian who made two glaring mistakes to cost his side a goal at the weekend.

"A goalkeeper is like any other player. They can make mistakes, because that's normal in football," said Luis Enrique.

The key for the visitors, meanwhile, could be Hugo Ekitike, Liverpool's leading scorer this season with 17 goals, who comes up against the club where he failed to make an impact earlier in his career.

Ekitike, 23, joined PSG from Reims in 2022 but scored just four goals in 18 months before leaving for Eintracht Frankfurt.

He struggled to break into an attack featuring Kylian Mbappe, Lionel Messi and Neymar but returns to his homeland as a genuine contender to start for France at the World Cup.

"Hugo is a great player. He is really in form so we are just hoping he won't be against us," said PSG's Dembele, his international teammate.


US Stops Israel’s Plan to Drag Syria to War on Hezbollah

Lebanese General Security members stand guard at the Masnaa border crossing with Syria in the Bekaa Valley, eastern Lebanon, 05 April 2026, following an Israeli warning to target the M30 highway between Lebanon and Syria. (EPA)
Lebanese General Security members stand guard at the Masnaa border crossing with Syria in the Bekaa Valley, eastern Lebanon, 05 April 2026, following an Israeli warning to target the M30 highway between Lebanon and Syria. (EPA)
TT

US Stops Israel’s Plan to Drag Syria to War on Hezbollah

Lebanese General Security members stand guard at the Masnaa border crossing with Syria in the Bekaa Valley, eastern Lebanon, 05 April 2026, following an Israeli warning to target the M30 highway between Lebanon and Syria. (EPA)
Lebanese General Security members stand guard at the Masnaa border crossing with Syria in the Bekaa Valley, eastern Lebanon, 05 April 2026, following an Israeli warning to target the M30 highway between Lebanon and Syria. (EPA)

Political sources in Tel Aviv revealed that Washington stopped Israel from striking the Masnaa border crossing between Lebanon and Syria, as well as a plan to drag Damascus into the war against Hezbollah.

Israel radio said that the American administration stopped Israel from bombing the crossing shortly after Tel Aviv had threatened to attack it over the weekend.

Israel had bombed an area close to the crossing, claiming Hezbollah was using it for “military” purposes.

Israel radio reported that the US had asked Tel Aviv to refrain from attacking the crossing for “political reasons” and to leave the issue to Syrian security officials who are working on behalf of Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

It quoted an informed source as saying that the Damascus government had told the Americans that it was working against Hezbollah and that it had thwarted in recent days attempts to smuggle weapons from Syria to Lebanon.

Other sources revealed that Israel wants Syria to become involved in the war against Hezbollah, despite the previous past experience when Israel allowed the Syrian army to enter Lebanon 1976 under the pretext of restoring peace when the country was in civil war. The military intervention led to years of Syrian hegemony over Lebanon, straining relations between Beirut and Damascus.

The sources told Israel’s Maariv that Israel is convinced that Lebanon has failed in confronting Hezbollah and American and western powers have lost faith in the Lebanese state. So, Israel has turned to the new Syrian authorities to “handle security responsibilities in Lebanon,” they said.

The US believes that the Lebanese government has not met the least of its commitments in disarming Hezbollah, while the army is incapable - or unwilling - to really confront the Iran-backed party, the sources continued.

Washington believes that it has no real partner in Lebanon and that no state and military authority has the power to disarm Hezbollah, they added.

Observers believe that the only two parties capable of and willing to fight Hezbollah are Israel and the new Syrian authorities led by Sharaa.

Israeli sources said Tel Aviv and Damascus have this common goal even if they are not allied with each other. The Syrian authorities view Hezbollah as an enemy, making it a convenient partner in achieving interests in Lebanon.

Tel Aviv believes that it can eventually reach understandings with Damascus whereby the Israeli military can control southern Lebanon and Syrian army controls the north and they can both work against Hezbollah.

“This appears to be the least of evils amid the current impasse,” said the observers.

Tel Aviv is trying to convince Washington of its position, explaining that it would not be waging war against the Lebanese state or imposing hegemony over it. Rather, it would be acting to remove the Hezbollah threat and impose a new reality in Lebanon.

Israel wants the US to relay these messages to Syria.

Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had in the 1970s held indirect talks between late Syrian President Hafez al-Assad's regime and Israel on Damascus sending troops to Lebanon with the aim to break the alliance between Lebanese leftists and the PLO.

The regime sent its forces in 1976, but over the years it became obvious that Assad sought to impose Syrian hegemony over Lebanon. In the ensuing years, he acted against Israeli invasions of Lebanon in 1978 and 1982.

The current Israeli government is hoping to avoid similar failures in Lebanon by reaching understandings with the current Syrian authorities.


Blasts Heard Near Erbil Airport in Iraqi Kurdistan as Factions Threaten US Interests

 A worker rides a bicycle at the Zubair oil field in Basra, Iraq, April 6, 2026. (Reuters)
A worker rides a bicycle at the Zubair oil field in Basra, Iraq, April 6, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Blasts Heard Near Erbil Airport in Iraqi Kurdistan as Factions Threaten US Interests

 A worker rides a bicycle at the Zubair oil field in Basra, Iraq, April 6, 2026. (Reuters)
A worker rides a bicycle at the Zubair oil field in Basra, Iraq, April 6, 2026. (Reuters)

Two blasts were heard near Erbil's airport, which hosts advisers from the US-led anti-ISIS coalition, in Iraq's northern Kurdistan region, an AFP journalist said on Monday.

Some hours earlier, air defense systems downed four missiles headed towards the US consulate in Erbil, a security source told AFP.

Local authorities also reported a separate deadly drone incident in a civilian area in the early hours of Tuesday morning.

The autonomous region's Counter-Terrorism Service said a "bomb-laden drone coming from Iran" crashed into a home in the Dara Shakran subdistrict of Erbil province after midnight, killing a couple.

Since the Middle East war erupted on February 28, shadowy Iraq-based groups have been claiming near daily attacks on US interests in the country and beyond.

The groups are nominally part of the "Islamic Resistance in Iraq", a loose alliance of pro-Iran factions opposed to the US presence in the country.

These groups have in turn come under attacks blamed on the United States and Israel.

Efforts to restore calm

Amid the tensions, media and political sources within the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework have spoken of efforts by head of the Badr organization Hadi al-Ameri to stop the escalation between the armed factions and Washington.

An official source in the Framework told Asharq Al-Awsat that it was unlikely that Ameri or others would be able to reach an agreement between the two parties to stop the attacks.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the source said the situation inside the Framework is "in disarray" and the conditions on the ground are complicated, so achieving de-escalation is "very difficult", noting that previous efforts to restore calm had failed.

The majority of Framework leaders are operating independently from each other because they are pursuing their own interests and seeking their own survival. Some are approaching the US and others Iran, added the source.

All of these actions are driven by post-war interests, it explained.

The source stressed that Iran is the only party capable of controlling the armed factions, whether in ordering them to continue to the attacks or stop them.

So, all other efforts, including the ones by the government, will fail, he said.

Threats

Meanwhile, head of the Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi warned in a statement on Monday that the Hormuz Strait "will not be opened to enemies."

In a statement, he said: "Any attempt to open the strait by force will lead to the disappearance of oil or gas platforms" - a possible threat to attacks on platforms in the Gulf.

"They must realize that either everyone or no one is safe," he went on to say.

He also said that the "Syrian front has now entered our defensive war and it will have a grievous impact on the enemies." He did not elaborate.

The Harakat al-Nujaba threatened to attack energy interests, bases and stations tied to the US at dawn on Tuesday, saying they were all "legitimate targets for the resistance."

"There are no red lines in this confrontation," said the group's military aide.

‘Egregious attacks’

The Pentagon has acknowledged that helicopters have carried out strikes against pro-Iran armed groups in Iraq during the war.

On Sunday, the US embassy in Baghdad said: "Iraqi terrorist militias affiliated with Iran conducted two more egregious attacks against US diplomatic facilities in Iraq overnight in an attempt to kill American diplomats."

The embassy spokesperson urged Iraqi authorities to prevent further attacks on the US mission and facilities.

"We will not hesitate to defend our personnel and facilities should the Iraqi government be unable to fulfill its obligations," the spokesperson said.

On Thursday, the Iraqi foreign ministry said it was "exerting maximum effort to prevent any escalation", including strengthening security to protect foreign and diplomatic interests as well as maintaining internal stability.

The Kurdistan region's Peshmerga security forces have also faced multiple attacks since the start of the war, with six of their fighters killed in an Iranian attack in March.

On Monday, the Peshmerga ministry said its command headquarters was attacked overnight by four explosive-laden drones, without specifying whether there were any casualties.

"Until now, there has not been a serious stance or practical steps to deter these terrorist attacks and put an end to them" by Iraq's federal authorities, the ministry said.