John Barnes: I Would Never Advise a Young Black Football Player to Walk off

John Barnes talks to the Guardian Sport about racism in football. (AFP)
John Barnes talks to the Guardian Sport about racism in football. (AFP)
TT

John Barnes: I Would Never Advise a Young Black Football Player to Walk off

John Barnes talks to the Guardian Sport about racism in football. (AFP)
John Barnes talks to the Guardian Sport about racism in football. (AFP)

John Barnes tells a story about a season-ticket holder at Liverpool who would become a friend and whose seat was in front of two men at Anfield having a conversation about Barnes’s proposed transfer from Watford in 1987. “Not sure about black players,” one said to the other. “Don’t know about their character.”

A few months later, on his home debut against Oxford United, Barnes scored a superb goal following a free-kick. The same bloke turned to the other, within earshot of the man who would later relay the tale to Barnes, and said: “You know, he’s not as black as I thought he was.”

Barnes has heard and seen it all. From the racist chanting at Chelsea on his debut for Watford as a 17-year‑old, to being called a “sambo” by National Front sympathizers who somehow made it on to a plane carrying England on a tour of South America in 1984. This was just a few days after he scored that amazing, mazy goal in the Maracanã in a 2-0 win over Brazil.

Thus is the man who won 79 England caps the perfect person to address the issue of racism and racial abuse that has threatened to accompany Russia’s World Cup. His take on it, and the recent hot topic of whether players should walk off the field if subjected to abuse, is not what might be expected, however.

“Yes, I went through overt racism as a footballer in the 80s and early 90s but that was, or is, nothing compared to what the average black person in the inner cities of England goes through every day,” he says.

“I’m John Barnes, high-profile footballer who had bananas thrown at him during a match, and ignorant people shouting racist abuse at him for 90 minutes – before getting into my big car and driving to my nice house – but is that as bad as the huge majority of black people who live in squalor and have no hope for themselves or their children being given an equal opportunity socially, economically or educationally?”

Barnes believes you cannot separate football from society. He advances a potent, trenchant argument. “Since I’ve been involved in professional football, it’s as if the rest of society is OK but football has a long way to go. Nothing could be further from the truth. As I’ve been saying for decades, as long as racism exists in society, it will exist in all facets of society. Until we eradicate it from society, football will be like any other industry.

“Before we are footballers or fans, we are ordinary members of society. We are doctors, lawyers, milkmen, postmen, unemployed people, students … So why are they called racist football fans? Are they just racist for the 90 minutes of a match, when the other six days a week they’re not?”

Born in Jamaica, Barnes came to England when his army colonel father, Kenneth, who had played football himself for his country, became military attaché to London. Later, in 1984, as his Watford side prepared to face Everton in the FA Cup final, Barnes was waiting for his dad in the Lillywhites sports shop at Piccadilly Circus when he was asked to leave by staff concerned he might be a shoplifter. His cultural heritage and such experience gives him huge historical insight.

“Racial discrimination is understandable due to the narrative that has been spun to us for the last 500 years about the worthiness, morality, and intellect of a certain group of people in relation to other groups, particularly black people,” Barnes says. “So the fact that we are now being told we are all equal … Well, it will take a much more substantial effort than ‘We are all the same’ to change a widely held belief through mistaken colonial history that was taught which wrongly convinced us that white people are superior.

“We hear a lot of ‘black players should’, or ‘black people should.’ Are we all sheep who should act a particular way because we are all the same and aren’t individual people?

“Would we ever say ‘white people should’? No, because we individualize white culture. French, Spanish, German, English are accepted as being so different from each other. But we are just ‘black people’. African society and culture varies much more than European society but it’s just considered ‘Africa’ as if they are all the same.”

Early this month, Barnes called in to a TalkSport debate about whether England’s black players should walk off the field should they be racially abused in Russia. He felt compelled to discuss the issue – heatedly – with the black journalist Darren Lewis, who believed they should.

“I know and respect Darren and get on well with him,” Barnes says, “but I believe that rather than look at Russia, let’s look closer to home before we start to throw stones. I used as an example his profession of journalism. I said how underrepresented ethnic and black people are in the mainstream media.

“He started to name four or five black journalists who work in that industry. Chris Hughton could do the same when asked about the lack of black managers by mentioning the four or five there are. We all know it’s a problem. But rather than talk about racism in Russia, or football, I prefer to talk about inequalities in society which are much wider and accepted.”

So should Raheem Sterling, Dele Alli et al walk off if abused? “Well, it depends on your interpretation of racist abuse,” Barnes says. “If one idiot in the crowd shouts at you, and you are the only one who hears, you are being told that you are fully entitled to walk off. Really? Just one? More? Many more? What form? Booing every time a black player gets the ball isn’t illegal, even though you know why the fans boo. It’s too ambiguous.

“We are told our young black players have strong views. As if older black players didn’t have strong views. And that walking off shows their strength. I wouldn’t honor black players of the past who went through much worse than I did by walking off the field to show my ‘strength’ because some ignorant fool shouts racist abuse. I preferred to carry on and do what I did best.

“That said, I would never advise a young black player to walk off or not walk off the field regardless of how I dealt with it, because we are all different. Again, the ‘black players should’ line … I find it insulting to suggest we are all the same.

“Racial bias is not just about verbal or physical abuse. It’s also about the perception society has of the ordinary black person when they apply for jobs or credit, or who we believe to be more worthy, intelligent or moral. Which form of discrimination is worse?”

It is those without a voice he feels the need to speak up for, or help to find their own. “It has always embarrassed me when people from the black community feel sorry for or support me and other black high‑profile members of society, such as actors and singers,” he says.

“I feel like shaking them and saying: ‘What about demanding equality and dignity for yourselves and your children?’ Have they become so devoid of hope for that, that they vicariously feel pride through a ‘superstar’ black person making it? Until the black person in the street is seen as equal, black people will never be equal.”

There remains, as he continues with his trademark machine-gun delivery, a fierce passion for football and life. “A black friend said that while he supported Liverpool, he would never go to watch until they signed an average black player. He meant that while Liverpool have signed countless average white players and no one batted an eyelid, a black player had to be better than the average white player or the narrative would be that black players aren’t good enough.

“If we really want to be considered equal, the testament to that wouldn’t be great black people being successful, it would be average black people being as successful as average white people.”

The Guardian Sport



Mexico City Suspends Classes, Shifts to Remote Work for World Cup Kickoff

 Souvenirs shaped like the FIFA World Cup trophy are displayed for sale on a street in Mexico City on June 8, 2026. (AFP)
Souvenirs shaped like the FIFA World Cup trophy are displayed for sale on a street in Mexico City on June 8, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Mexico City Suspends Classes, Shifts to Remote Work for World Cup Kickoff

 Souvenirs shaped like the FIFA World Cup trophy are displayed for sale on a street in Mexico City on June 8, 2026. (AFP)
Souvenirs shaped like the FIFA World Cup trophy are displayed for sale on a street in Mexico City on June 8, 2026. (AFP)

Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum on Tuesday issued a decree ordering federal workers in the capital to work from home on June 11 and suspending school classes to ease traffic ‌during FIFA World ‌Cup opening ‌events.

The decree aims ⁠to improve urban mobility and road safety as Mexico City hosts the World Cup opening match and accompanying ⁠events on June 11.

The ‌opening events are expected ‌to draw significant numbers of ‌visitors.

Federal agencies must implement remote work schemes for Mexico City-based staff, with ‌exceptions for essential services including healthcare, security, critical ⁠infrastructure ⁠and World Cup operations.

Schools from preschool through university, both public and private, will close for the day under the decree.

The government also urged private companies to adopt similar remote work arrangements.


Iran Football Body Claims Fans’ Tickets for World Cup Games in the US Have Been Revoked

 Reza Mansoori (R) and Mostafa Pourmanda, Iranian supporters living in San Diego and staying at the same hotel as Iran's national football team, cheer for their team in Tijuana, Mexico, on June 8, 2026, ahead of the FIFA 2026 World Cup football tournament. (AFP)
Reza Mansoori (R) and Mostafa Pourmanda, Iranian supporters living in San Diego and staying at the same hotel as Iran's national football team, cheer for their team in Tijuana, Mexico, on June 8, 2026, ahead of the FIFA 2026 World Cup football tournament. (AFP)
TT

Iran Football Body Claims Fans’ Tickets for World Cup Games in the US Have Been Revoked

 Reza Mansoori (R) and Mostafa Pourmanda, Iranian supporters living in San Diego and staying at the same hotel as Iran's national football team, cheer for their team in Tijuana, Mexico, on June 8, 2026, ahead of the FIFA 2026 World Cup football tournament. (AFP)
Reza Mansoori (R) and Mostafa Pourmanda, Iranian supporters living in San Diego and staying at the same hotel as Iran's national football team, cheer for their team in Tijuana, Mexico, on June 8, 2026, ahead of the FIFA 2026 World Cup football tournament. (AFP)

FIFA has revoked the ticket allocation for Iran fans at the team’s three World Cup games in the United States, the national soccer federation claimed Tuesday.

Each federation for the 48 teams taking part is entitled to receive and distribute 8% of stadium capacity at the World Cup, adding up to several thousands of tickets for each game.

Just days before Iran opens its World Cup — on June 15 at the Los Angeles Rams’ stadium in Inglewood against New Zealand — the federation claimed in a statement reported by semi-official state media that it was now unable to provide any tickets to its supporters.

FIFA was approached for comment.

The claim adds to the turmoil between Iranian soccer, FIFA and tournament co-host the US, which began military attacks on Iran on Feb. 28.

Iran’s team is now based in the Mexican border city of Tijuana instead of its pre-war plan to train in Tucson, Arizona.

Some federation officials also have been denied visas to enter the US, where Iran also plays Belgium in Inglewood on June 21 and then Egypt in Seattle on June 26.

Federations of World Cup teams typically sell their ticket allocation to the most loyal fans who attend games at home and away.

Iran residents were subject to a travel ban by the US government since last year and were unlikely to get entry visas for the World Cup. It was unclear how many tickets in Iran’s allocation were sold since the tournament draw was made in December to the country's diaspora including in the US.

Still, FIFA president Gianni Infantino stated in 2017 — when US football officials were preparing a co-hosting bid with Canada and Mexico they won the following year — that fans must have access to the tournament.

“It’s obvious when it comes to FIFA competitions as well (that) any team, including the supporters and the officials of that team, who would qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup,” Infantino said nine years ago. “That is obvious.”

A FIFA-appointed match referee from Somalia was denied entry to the US in Miami at the weekend and on Monday he was ruled out of taking part in the 104-game tournament that starts on Thursday.


World Cup Nears Kickoff after Pre-tournament Turbulence

The World Cup will kick off in the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City. Carl DE SOUZA / AFP
The World Cup will kick off in the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City. Carl DE SOUZA / AFP
TT

World Cup Nears Kickoff after Pre-tournament Turbulence

The World Cup will kick off in the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City. Carl DE SOUZA / AFP
The World Cup will kick off in the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City. Carl DE SOUZA / AFP

The World Cup kicks off on Thursday with FIFA betting that the enduring appeal of the greatest footballing show on earth can rise above anger at soaring ticket prices, an uneasy political climate in Donald Trump's America and the shadow of conflict in the Middle East.

A record 48 teams and millions of fans are set to descend on the United States, Canada and Mexico for the first ever World Cup co-hosted by three nations, the largest and most logistically complex edition of the tournament ever staged.

The action gets under way at Mexico City's iconic Estadio Azteca on Thursday, with co-hosts Mexico taking on South Africa at 3:00 pm local time (1900 GMT), launching a sprawling, nearly six-week-long spectacle that will culminate in the final at New Jersey's 82,500-seat MetLife Stadium on July 19.

Can Lionel Messi, at the age of 38, settle any lingering debate about his status as the greatest player of all time by leading Argentina to a second consecutive World Cup title?

Or can Messi's great rival, the 41-year-old Cristiano Ronaldo, defy father time by inspiring a talented Portugal team to its maiden World Cup win?

Or will England, led by Harry Kane, finally end the country's 60-year wait for a second major international championship following their lone 1966 World Cup victory?

Those questions and more will be answered over the course of a tournament that Gianni Infantino, the president of world football's governing FIFA, has bullishly hyped as "the greatest show that the planet has ever seen."

- Ticket fury -

Yet Infantino's breezy optimism has run into hurricane-force headwinds of skepticism during a build-up dogged by concerns over affordability, politics and conflict.

The skyrocketing cost of tickets to the tournament has triggered a global backlash which has left FIFA and Infantino struggling to mount a convincing public relations defense.

The most expensive ticket for the 2022 World Cup final cost around $1,600 at face value; in 2026 the most expensive face value ticket being sold by FIFA is an eye-watering $32,970.

That kind of inflation has been prevalent across the tournament's 104 matches, where seats for many games remain available on secondary re-sale markets despite huge demand.

Even Infantino's staunch ally, Donald Trump, has balked at the cost, reacting with surprise when told of the $1,000 price tag for tickets to the USA's opening game with Paraguay in Los Angeles on Friday -- the first game on US soil.

"I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," the US president told the New York Post.

While fans absorb the expense of travel to the tournament, other critics have questioned whether the World Cup party will be soured by the political climate in the United States.

Human Rights Watch says Trump's crackdowns on immigration, demonstrations and press freedom could lead to a World Cup defined by "exclusion and fear."

Those fears were fueled Monday when FIFA dropped a Somali referee from the World Cup after he was denied entry to the United States.

Omar Artan was set to be the first match official from Somalia to referee at a global finals, but he was turned back when he arrived at Miami International Airport on Saturday.

FIFA said it was powerless to influence the decision and announced it had omitted Artan from its 52-strong referees roster.

The US-Israel military strikes launched against Iran in February have also loomed large over the tournament, where Iran are due to play three group games in the United States, starting with their opener against New Zealand on June 15.

Trump initially suggested Iran should withdraw from the tournament for their own "life and safety" before walking back his rhetoric.

Iran meanwhile have switched their base camp from Tucson, Arizona to the Mexican city of Tijuana, where they touched down early Sunday.

While Iran's players are free to travel in and out of the United States, some 15 administrative and management staff have been denied visas by US authorities in a move Iranian authorities have condemned as "deliberate and discriminatory treatment."

- Expanded field -

On the field, the decision to expand the tournament to 48 teams -- up from 32 in 2022 -- is likely to strip the group stage of any sense of jeopardy.

A total of 72 first-round matches will be needed to eliminate just 12 teams, with 32 advancing to the knockout rounds -- the top two finishers in each of the 12 first ground groups along with the eight best third-place finishers.

The tournament will see a range of other innovations.

For the first time in World Cup history, every game will feature cooling breaks in the middle of each half, a measure designed to mitigate the effects of searing heat and humidity expected at many of the tournament's 16 venues.

Players and referees will need to adjust to several new rules being rolled out at the World Cup, including teams being required to make substitutions inside 10 seconds to prevent time-wasting.

A crackdown on racist abuse will see players risk a red card for covering their mouth with a hand, arm or shirt during a confrontation with an opponent.

Next month's final, meanwhile, could well be the longest on record due to the decision to stage a Super Bowl-style halftime show, headlined by Madonna, Shakira and BTS.

The show means the half-time interval will be stretched from the traditional 15 minutes to around 25 minutes.